Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.

PURPOSE To prospectively correlate dynamic contrast enhancement at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with mammographic and pathologic features of suspect breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-nine patients with 51 breast lesions underwent gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) MR imaging at 1.5 T, as well as excisional biopsy or cyst aspiration. RESULTS Twenty-two of 22 (100%) invasive carcinomas 8 mm or more in diameter, including three (12%) not evident on dense mammograms, enhanced 2.0 or more times the unenhanced intensity. One of three predominantly ductal carcinomas in situ and 10 of 26 (38%) benign lesions enhanced 2.0 or more times. Time-intensity curves were not statistically significantly different among enhancing carcinomas, fibroadenomas, or other benign lesions and showed no statistically significant correlations with pathologic size, nodal status, or hormone receptor status of invasive carcinomas. CONCLUSION MR imaging enhancement of 2.0 or more times had high sensitivity (100%) for invasive carcinomas 8 mm or more in diameter, with moderate specificity (65%). Time-intensity curves showed no significant difference between enhancement of benign and malignant lesions.

[1]  N. Weidner,et al.  Clinically occult, noncalcified breast cancer: serial radiologic-pathologic correlation in 27 cases. , 1988, Radiology.

[2]  G H Whitehouse,et al.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of local recurrent breast carcinoma. , 1991, Clinical radiology.

[3]  J T Ennis,et al.  Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. , 1990, Radiology.

[4]  M D Schnall,et al.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. , 1989, Radiology.

[6]  C W Piccoli.  The specificity of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[7]  J. Allison,et al.  Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses by time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  P. Viehweg,et al.  Sensitivity of contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[9]  R. Gilles,et al.  Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. , 1993, Radiology.

[10]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[11]  David L. Page,et al.  Diagnostic Histopathology of the Breast , 1988 .

[12]  D. Kopans,et al.  Spring hookwire breast lesion localizer: use with rigid-compression mammographic systems. , 1985, Radiology.

[13]  L J van Erning,et al.  MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. , 1994, Radiology.

[14]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[15]  Kaiser Wa.  False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid. , 1994 .

[16]  Recurrent breast carcinoma after conservative treatment: MRI features and pathologic correlation , 1994 .

[17]  J H Simon,et al.  Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  O Lucidarme,et al.  Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.