Customer loyalty in the public transportation context

Public transportation agencies, much like other service industries, have a constant churn of their customer base. New customers are entering and current customers are defecting every day. Traditionally, efforts to increase this customer base have focused on attracting more first-time users. However, preventing the loss of customers to competitive modes, such as the auto, has many added benefits that are not often realized. Loyal customers provide recommendations to others, increase and diversify their use of the service, and do not require the acquisition costs associated with new customers. This study aims to develop a strategy to identify the key drivers of customer loyalty to public transportation agencies, using the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) as a case study. Once these influencing factors have been identified for the general population, loyalty differences between key market segments can be tested and analyzed. Based on these results, specific areas of service provision can be targeted for improvement and marketing campaigns can be developed so that customer segments can be targeted based on which areas are most important to them. Factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to create a customer loyalty model for the CTA. Factors identified as contributing to a rider's loyalty were problem experience, perceptions of service quality', service value, perceptions of CTA, and customer satisfaction. The results for the general population showed that the average customer bases their decision to continue to use the service in the future fairly evenly on perceptions of service quality, service value, and customer satisfaction with the remaining two factors playing only indirect roles. The most important factor for a customer to recommend the service to others is their perceptions Qf service quality. The model results were then applied to key market segmentations (captive vs. choice riders, riders with low vs. high accessibility to transit, and bus riders vs. rail riders) using ANOVA, MIMIC, and multiple group analysis. It was found that captive riders are highly sensitive to problem experience; they report experiencing more problems and those problems more strongly influence the rest of the loyalty model. Riders with high accessibility generally rate all model factors higher than those with low accessibility and are, in turn, more loyal. Finally, bus riders' loyalty is more highly affected by their perceptions of service quality which could stem from the unpredictability of bus service resulting from exogenous factors. By developing a more thorough understanding of what keeps their customers coming back, public transportation agencies can more effectively use their limited resources by growing a base of loyal customers, and in turn, increasing their revenues. Thesis Supervisors: Nigel H.M. Wilson and Jinhua Zhao Titles: Professor and Research Scientist in Civil and Environmental Engineering

[1]  K. Ruyter,et al.  Investigating drivers of bank loyalty: the complex relationship between image, service quality and satisfaction , 1998 .

[2]  F. Selnes An Examination of the Effect of Product Performance on Brand Reputation, Satisfaction and Loyalty , 1993 .

[3]  Jin-Woo Park,et al.  Modelling the Impact of Airline Service Quality and Marketing Variables on Passengers’ Future Behavioural Intentions , 2006 .

[4]  L. F. Cunningham,et al.  A cost/benefit approach to understanding service loyalty , 2001 .

[5]  C. Fornell A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience: , 1992 .

[6]  Alan Dick,et al.  Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework , 1994 .

[7]  Barry J. Babin,et al.  How Quality, Value, Image, and Satisfaction Create Loyalty at a Chinese Telecom , 2009 .

[8]  P. A. Dabholkar,et al.  A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study , 2000 .

[9]  C. Stein,et al.  Structural equation modeling. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[10]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension , 1992 .

[11]  K. Walsh Marketing and Public Sector Management , 1994 .

[12]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Switching barriers and repurchase intentions in services , 2000 .

[13]  LU Yan LU Juan Dimensions and influencing factors of customer loyalty in the intermittent service industry , 2009 .

[14]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  EVALUATION OF TRIP-INDUCING EFFECTS OF NEW FREEWAYS USING A STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODEL SYSTEM OF COMMUTERS' TIME USE AND TRAVEL , 2000 .

[15]  Thomas H. Stone,et al.  The Impact of Employee Empowerment on the Quality of a Service Recovery Effort , 1998 .

[16]  M. Withey,et al.  Predicting Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect. , 1989 .

[17]  Valerie Webb,et al.  Quantifying the Benefits: Application of Customer Loyalty Modeling in Public Transportation Context , 2010 .

[18]  A. Zins Relative attitudes and commitment in customer loyalty models , 2001 .

[19]  P. Foote,et al.  Exploring Customer Loyalty as a Transit Performance Measure , 2001 .

[20]  R. Oliver Whence Consumer Loyalty? , 1999 .

[21]  Seyoung Kim,et al.  How Households Use Different Types of Vehicles: A Structural Driver Allocation and Usage Model , 1995 .

[22]  T Morikawa,et al.  DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS WITH LATENT VARIABLES USING SUBJECTIVE DATA (CHAPTER 24 OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH: UPDATING THE STATE OF PLAY) , 1998 .

[23]  P. Valette-Florence,et al.  Conceptual and operational aspects of brand loyalty: an empirical investigation , 2001 .

[24]  Arturo Z. Vasquez-Parraga,et al.  The Path of Patient Loyalty and the Role of Doctor Reputation , 2009, Health marketing quarterly.

[25]  Yu-Ching Chiao,et al.  Understanding the Antecedents to Customer Loyalty by Applying Structural Equation Modeling , 2007 .

[26]  S. Bregman,et al.  Understanding How to Motivate Communities to Support and Ride Public Transportation , 2008 .

[27]  L. Moutinho The Lifebelt - the Definitive Guide to Managing Customer Retention, John A Murphy, Wiley , 2001 .