Increased Readiness for Adaptation and Faster Alternation Rates Under Binocular Rivalry in Children

Binocular rivalry in childhood has been poorly investigated in the past. Information is scarce with respect to infancy, and there is a complete lack of data on the development of binocular rivalry beyond the first 5–6 years of age. In this study, we are attempting to fill this gap by investigating the developmental trends in binocular rivalry in pre-puberty. We employ a classic behavioral paradigm with orthogonal gratings, and introduce novel statistical measures (after Pastukhov and Braun) to analyze the data. These novel measures provide a sensitive tool to estimate the impact of the history of perceptual dominance on future alternations. We found that the cumulative history of perceptual alternations has an impact on future percepts, and that this impact is significantly stronger and faster in children than in adults. Assessment of the “cumulative history” and its characteristic time-constant helps us to take a look at the adaptive states of the visual system under multi-stable perception, and brings us closer to establishing a possible developmental scenario of binocular rivalry: a greater and faster relative contribution of neural adaptation is found in children, and this increased readiness for adaption seems to be associated with faster alternation rates.

[1]  R. Blake,et al.  Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[2]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Pre-stereoptic binocular vision in infants , 1986, Vision Research.

[3]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Cortical binocularity in infants , 1980, Nature.

[4]  J Timothy Petersik,et al.  Buildup and Decay of a Three-Dimensional Rotational Aftereffect Obtained with a Three-Dimensional Figure , 2002, Perception.

[5]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  The Role of Voluntary and Involuntary Attention in Selecting Perceptual Dominance during Binocular Rivalry , 2007, Perception.

[6]  G. Baumgartner,et al.  Development of stereopsis and cortical binocularity in human infants: electrophysiological evidence. , 1981, Science.

[7]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash , 1984, Vision Research.

[8]  I. Kovács,et al.  Visual Context Integration is Not Fully Developed in 4-Year-Old Children , 2003, Perception.

[9]  A. Kertesz,et al.  Microsaccadic eye movements and binocular rivalry , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  P. Walker.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[12]  G. J. Brouwer,et al.  Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability , 2005, Vision Research.

[13]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability , 2009 .

[14]  H. Tuckwell.  Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology: Linear Cable Theory and Dendritic Structure , 1988 .

[15]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[16]  E. Jalavisto.  THE PHENOMENON OF RETINAL RIVALRY IN THE AGED. , 1964, Gerontologia.

[17]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Sensitivity Underlying Changes in Visual Consciousness , 2010, Current Biology.

[18]  Robert Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1967 .

[19]  I. Kovács.  Human development of perceptual organization , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  I. Kovács,et al.  Late maturation of visual spatial integration in humans. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  A. Norcia,et al.  Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory , 2007, Vision Research.

[24]  Angela M. Brown,et al.  Early binocular vision in human infants: limitations on the generality of the Superposition Hypothesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[25]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[26]  Randolph Blake,et al.  What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[27]  L Stark,et al.  Eye Movements during the Viewing of Necker Cubes , 1978, Perception.

[28]  M Nawrot,et al.  Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion. , 1989, Science.

[29]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Necker cube—an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing , 2005, Vision Research.

[30]  S. R. Lehky.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  K. Ukai,et al.  Binocular Rivalry Alternation Rate Declines with Age , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[32]  A. Borsellino,et al.  Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli , 1972, Kybernetik.

[33]  Expectancy and perception of an ambiguous figure in preschool children , 1962 .

[34]  T. Radil,et al.  The effects of pattern shape, subliminal stimulation, and voluntary control on multistable visual perception , 2008, Brain Research.

[35]  Alexander Pastukhov,et al.  Cumulative history quantifies the role of neural adaptation in multistable perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[36]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Indu Vedamurthy,et al.  Interocular interactions during acuity measurement in children and adults, and in adults with amblyopia , 2007, Vision Research.

[38]  M. Doherty,et al.  Children's understanding of ambiguous figures: Which cognitive developments are necessary to experience reversal? , 2005 .