A mathematical structure relating situation knowledge to performance

ABSTRACT The linguistic conjecture that a person's knowledge regarding a situation affects some aspects of that person's performance at a task is translated into a mathematical structure. The structure contains a symbolic representation of the conjecture, along with a symbolic definition of what type of knowledge constitutes ‘situation’ knowledge. The structure is applied to a short example to demonstrate its use. The translation of the conjecture into a mathematical structure enables researchers to use a consistent, objective framework for testing hypothesised relationships between one's situation knowledge and performance, as well as enables mathematical tools to be applied to the study of this conjecture.

[1]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study , 2009 .

[3]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Situation Awareness , 2006 .

[4]  John Piggott,et al.  Situational awareness and safety , 2001 .

[5]  Claudia J. Stanny,et al.  Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving , 2007 .

[6]  S. Dekker Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Steven J. Landry,et al.  Impact of the use of Techniques and Situation Awareness on Pilots' Procedure Compliance , 2006 .

[8]  Martin L. Fracker,et al.  Measures of Situation Awareness: Review and Future Directions , 1991 .

[9]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Illusions of Explanation:A Critical Essay on Error Classification , 2003 .

[10]  A. Kirlik,et al.  Situation awareness as judgment I: Statistical modeling and quantitative measurement , 2006 .

[11]  Max Tegmark The Mathematical Universe , 2007, Foundations of Physics.

[12]  Richard H. Mogford,et al.  Mental Models and Situation Awareness in Air Traffic Control , 1997 .

[13]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[14]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[15]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT , 2000 .

[16]  K. C. Hendy,et al.  AGARD AMP Symposium on ‘ Situational Awareness : 21-1 Limitations and Enhancements in the Aviation Environment , Brussels , 24-28 April 1995 Situation Awareness and Workload : Birds of a Feather ? , 1997 .

[17]  David Woods,et al.  Situation Awareness: A Critical But Ill-Defined Phenomenon , 1991 .

[18]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task , 2006 .

[19]  Klaus Eyferth,et al.  Securing future ATM-concepts' safety by measuring situation awareness in ATC , 2003 .

[20]  R. M. Taylor,et al.  Situational Awareness Rating Technique (Sart): The Development of a Tool for Aircrew Systems Design , 2017 .

[21]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[22]  G. Bedny,et al.  Theory of Activity and Situation Awareness , 1999 .

[23]  L. Gugerty Situation Awareness During Driving: Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in Dynamic Spatial Memory , 1997 .

[24]  M R Endsley,et al.  Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[25]  Ben Willems,et al.  Implications of reduced involvement in en route air traffic control. , 1999 .

[26]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Evaluation of Ecological Interface Design for Nuclear Process Control: Situation Awareness Effects , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[27]  John M. Flach,et al.  Situation Awareness: Proceed with Caution , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Neville Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[29]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone , 2005 .

[30]  George Mason Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation:Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs , 2011 .

[31]  Danko Nikolić,et al.  SITUATION AWARENESS AS A PREDICTOR OF PERFORMANCE IN EN ROUTE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS , 1998 .

[32]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[33]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Human factors and folk models , 2004, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[34]  Mica R. Endsley Situation awareness: operationally necessary and scientifically grounded , 2015, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[35]  David N. Hogg,et al.  Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control rooms , 1995 .

[36]  Steven J. Landry,et al.  Coincidence Between the Scientific and Folk Uses of the Term “Situation(al) Awareness” in Aviation Incident Reports , 2011 .

[37]  N. Stanton,et al.  Is situation awareness all in the mind? , 2010 .

[38]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Feedback and driver situation awareness (SA): A comparison of SA measures and contexts , 2008 .

[39]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  Situation awareness systems, states and processes: a holistic framework , 2015 .

[40]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  The role of awareness in situation awareness , 2004 .

[41]  Yvette J. Tenney,et al.  Situation awareness catches on: what? so what? now what? , 2006 .

[42]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review , 2000 .

[43]  S. Dekker,et al.  Situation awareness: some conditions of possibility , 2015 .