Research on Mixed User Equilibrium Model Based on Mobile Internet Traffic Information Service

Previous studies established traffic demand equilibrium with an assumption that all the traffic information on road is easily accessed by the in-need traffic participants, which is not true in the real applications (due to data collections difficulty). The newly emerging smart portable devices (e.g., smart phones) generate massive on-site traffic data (speed, density, etc.), which stimulates us re-consider designing the traffic demand equilibrium. For the purpose of analyzing mobile internet service influence on traffic demand, we build up a Probit-based model with consideration of multiple traffic constraints (i.e., traveler type, actual travelling time, perceiving travelling time). The Monte Carlo method is introduced to simulating initial route selection probability distributions, and the Method of Successive Averages (MSA) is developed to help the Monte Carlo algorithm converge at optimal solution. We have implemented our model on typical traffic travelling scenario with very complex traffic network demands. The experimental results suggested that larger mobility service coverage can significantly reduce the overall traffic time in the free flow state, and the mobility service coverage rate ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 is supposed to provide minimum travelling time for the overall traffic network, while larger coverage rate at congested state may reduce the traffic network efficiency.

[1]  Rong-Chang Jou,et al.  Modeling the impact of pre-trip information on commuter departure time and route choice , 2001 .

[2]  Jinjun Tang,et al.  Jointly analyzing freeway traffic incident clearance and response time using a copula-based approach , 2018 .

[3]  Gaetano Valenti,et al.  Traffic Estimation And Prediction Based On Real Time Floating Car Data , 2008, 2008 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Hai Yang,et al.  Multiple equilibrium behaviors and advanced traveler information systems with endogenous market penetration , 1998 .

[5]  Randolph W. Hall,et al.  Non-recurrent congestion: How big is the problem? Are traveler information systems the solution? , 1993 .

[6]  Nicole van Nes,et al.  The study design of UDRIVE: the naturalistic driving study across Europe for cars, trucks and scooters , 2016 .

[7]  Fang Liu,et al.  Lane-changes prediction based on adaptive fuzzy neural network , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Pedro M. Valero-Mora,et al.  Identifying critical incidents in naturalistic driving data: experiences from a promoting real life observation for gaining understanding of road user behaviour in Europe small-scale field trial , 2013 .

[9]  Daniel George Florian,et al.  Simulation-based evaluation of Advanced Traveler Information Services (ATIS) , 2004 .

[10]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  A CELL-BASED SIMULTANEOUS ROUTE AND DEPARTURE TIME CHOICE MODEL WITH ELASTIC DEMAND , 2004 .

[11]  Pedro M. Valero-Mora,et al.  Proposal of Geographic Information Systems Methodology for Quality Control Procedures of Data Obtained in Naturalistic Driving Studies , 2015 .

[12]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  Modeling advanced traveler information services: static versus dynamic paradigms , 2004 .

[13]  Chuan Ding,et al.  A time-varying parameters vector auto-regression model to disentangle the time varying effects between drivers’ responses and tolling on high occupancy toll facilities , 2018 .

[14]  Sai Chand,et al.  Mobile phone conversation distraction: Understanding differences in impact between simulator and naturalistic driving studies. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Jie Ma,et al.  Link Restriction: Methods of Testing and Avoiding Braess Paradox in Networks Considering Traffic Demands , 2018 .

[16]  André de Palma,et al.  Does providing information to drivers reduce traffic congestion , 1991 .

[17]  Zhongya Wei,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Probe Vehicle-based Sampling for Real-time Traffic Information System , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[18]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  A cell-based dynamic traffic assignment model: Formulation and properties , 2002 .

[19]  Huafeng Wu,et al.  Robust Ship Tracking via Multi-view Learning and Sparse Representation , 2018, Journal of Navigation.

[20]  J. G. Wardrop,et al.  Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research , 1952 .

[21]  Karthik K. Srinivasan,et al.  Determination of Number of Probe Vehicles Required for Reliable Travel Time Measurement in Urban Network , 1996 .

[22]  Feng Guo,et al.  Effect of Using Mobile Phones on Driver’s Control Behavior Based on Naturalistic Driving Data , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.