How environment risks moderate the effect of control on performance in information technology projects: Perspectives of project managers and user liaisons

Internal environment risk (IR) negatively moderates the effectiveness of controls.External environment risk (ER) positively moderates the effectiveness of controls.The moderating effect of IR is stronger than that of ER for project managers.The moderating effect of ER is stronger than that of IR for user liaisons. Successful management of information technology (IT) projects is a primary concern of project managers (PMs) and user liaisons (ULs). Prior studies have indicated that high risks result in low performance in IT projects, whereas effective enforcement of formal and informal controls enhances performance. These two streams have been integrated by examining the interactions between environment risks and control. However, contradictory findings have been presented given that environment risks can positively or negatively moderate the effect of control on performance. Furthermore, the collective effects of environment risks and controls across different stakeholders remain unknown. Quantitative analysis of data from 128 completed IT projects in China indicates that internal environment risk negatively moderates the effect of formal and informal controls on the product performance of IT projects from the perspectives of PMs and ULs. By contrast, external environment risk positively moderates the effectiveness of controls, thereby indicating the significant and diverse moderating roles of various environment risks in the relationship of control and performance. Environment risks can be threats to or facilitators of the success of IT projects. In addition, external environment risk moderates the effect of formal control on product performance for ULs more than internal environment risk, whereas the moderating effect of internal environment risk for PMs is stronger than that of external environment risk. This finding provides additional evidence that the moderating effects of internal and external environment risks differ among various stakeholders.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[2]  A. E. Sengün,et al.  Trust, Control, and Risk , 2007 .

[3]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Contextual influences on self-control of is professionals engaged in systems development , 1996 .

[4]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2016 .

[5]  Mark Keil,et al.  How Software Project Risk Affects Project Performance: An Investigation of the Dimensions of Risk and an Exploratory Model , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[6]  Sarma R. Nidumolu.  The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Contract Performance in Offshore Systems Development: Role of Control Mechanisms , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Tao Chen,et al.  Comparing senior executive and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Chinese Delphi study , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  Bernard J. Jaworski.  Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences , 1988 .

[10]  L. Kirsch.  The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[11]  Arun Rai,et al.  Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships , 2009, MIS Q..

[12]  Stig Larsson,et al.  Evaluating performance in the development of software-intensive products , 2014, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[13]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Control in Internal and Outsourced Software Projects , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  A. Tiwana,et al.  Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances , 2007 .

[15]  Vijay S. Mookerjee,et al.  Optimal Enhancement and Lifetime of Software Systems: A Control Theoretic Analysis: Optimal Enhancement and Lifetime of Software Systems , 2011 .

[16]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[17]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  Theoretical perspectives on the outsourcing of information systems , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Gary Klein,et al.  Pre-project partnering impact on an information system project, project team and project manager , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Sarma R. Nidumolu.  Standardization, requirements uncertainty and software project performance , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[20]  A. Tiwana.  Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing , 2008 .

[21]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .

[22]  Gregory J. Skulmoski,et al.  Information Systems Project Manager Soft Competencies: A Project-Phase Investigation , 2010 .

[23]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A framework for identifying software project risks , 1998, CACM.

[25]  William R. King,et al.  Predictors of Formal Control Usage in IT Outsourcing Partnerships , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Gary Klein,et al.  Software development risks to project effectiveness , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[27]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Mark Keil,et al.  Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[29]  W. W. Rozeboom.  Sensitivity of a linear composite of predictor items to differential item weighting , 1979 .

[30]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[31]  Shu-Chen Yang,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Social Capital, Behavioural Control, and Tacit Knowledge Sharing—a Multi-informant Design , 2022 .

[32]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  IT Outsourcing Success: A Psychological Contract Perspective , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[34]  Shan Liu,et al.  Understanding the impact of risks on performance in internal and outsourced information technology projects: The role of strategic importance , 2014 .

[35]  Vijay S. Mookerjee,et al.  Optimal Enhancement and Lifetime of Software Systems: A Control Theoretic Analysis , 2010 .

[36]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  CROSSROADS - Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Sun-Jen Huang,et al.  An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..

[38]  J. March,et al.  Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking , 1987 .

[39]  Shan Liu,et al.  How user risk and requirements risk moderate the effects of formal and informal control on the process performance of IT projects , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Michel Benaroch,et al.  Managing Information Technology Investment Risk: A Real Options Perspective , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Mark Keil,et al.  Understanding the most critical skills for managing IT projects: A Delphi study of IT project managers , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[43]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[44]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[45]  Henri Barki,et al.  User Participation in Information Systems Security Risk Management , 2010, MIS Q..

[46]  Prodromos D. Chatzoglou,et al.  IT/IS implementation risks and their impact on firm performance , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[47]  Yi Wang,et al.  IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework , 2011 .

[49]  Traci Carte,et al.  In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and Their Solutions , 2003, MIS Q..

[50]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Santiago Melián-González,et al.  Human resources control systems and performance: the role of uncertainty and risk propensity , 2008 .

[52]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Anandasivam Gopal,et al.  Research Note - The Role of Organizational Controls and Boundary Spanning in Software Development Outsourcing: Implications for Project Performance , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[55]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Control of Flexible Software Development Under Uncertainty , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  J. Dermer,et al.  Interactive Effects of Uncertainty and Self-Control on the Acceptance of Responsibility for, and Satisfaction with, Performance , 1974 .

[57]  Alan S. Dunk,et al.  RELIANCE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL, ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING UNITS , 1995 .

[58]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Roman Beck,et al.  Control Balancing in Information Systems Development Offshoring Projects , 2013, MIS Q..

[61]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  Samer Al Hawari,et al.  Knowledge-Based Risk Management framework for Information Technology project , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[63]  Tom Addison,et al.  E-commerce project development risks: evidence from a Delphi survey , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[64]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[65]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[66]  C. Schultz,et al.  The moderating role of internal and external resources on the performance effect of multitasking: Evidence from the R&D performance of surgeons , 2013 .

[67]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study 1 , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..