Energy cost of propulsion in standard and ultralight wheelchairs in people with spinal cord injuries.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Wheelchair- and subject-related factors influence the efficiency of wheelchair propulsion. The purpose of this study was to compare wheelchair propulsion in ultralight and standard wheelchairs in people with different levels of spinal cord injury. SUBJECTS Seventy-four subjects (mean age=26.2 years, SD=7.14, range=17-50) with spinal cord injury resulting in motor loss (30 with tetraplegia and 44 with paraplegia) were studied. METHOD Each subject propelled standard and ultralight wheelchairs around an outdoor track at self-selected speeds, while data were collected at 4 predetermined intervals. Speed, distance traveled, and oxygen cost (VO2 mL/kg/m) were compared by wheelchair, group, and over time, using a Bonferroni correction. RESULTS In the ultralight wheelchair, speed and distance traveled were greater for both subjects with paraplegia and subjects with tetraplegia, whereas VO2 was less only for subjects with paraplegia. Subjects with paraplegia propelled faster and farther than did subjects with tetraplegia. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION The ultralight wheelchair improved the efficiency of propulsion in the tested subjects. Subjects with tetraplegia, especially at the C6 level, are limited in their ability to propel a wheelchair.

[1]  J R Parziale.  STANDARD v LIGHTWEIGHT WHEELCHAIR PROPULSION IN SPINAL CORD INJURED PATIENTS , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  Stephen F. Figoni,et al.  Physiological Responses of Quadriplegic and Able-Bodied Men During Exercise at the Same VO2 , 1988 .

[3]  S O Brattgård,et al.  Energy expenditure and heart rate in driving a wheel-chair ergometer. , 1970, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  M N Sawka,et al.  Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[5]  H J Hislop,et al.  Metabolic energy cost of unrestrained walking. , 1976, Physical therapy.

[6]  K. Curtis,et al.  Functional reach in wheelchair users: the effects of trunk and lower extremity stabilization. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Hans Stoboy,et al.  Workload and energy expenditure during wheelchair propelling , 1971, Paraplegia.

[8]  R. Boileau,et al.  Comparison of physiological responses to maximal arm exercise among able-bodied, paraplegics and quadriplegics , 1987, Paraplegia.

[9]  Gale G. Whiteneck,et al.  Spinal cord injury : clinical outcomes from the model systems , 1995 .

[10]  T. P. White,et al.  Effects of wheelchair design on metabolic and heart rate responses during propulsion by persons with paraplegia. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[11]  J. Subbarao,et al.  Prevalence and impact of wrist and shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord injury. , 1995, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[12]  G Hildebrandt,et al.  Energy costs of propelling wheelchair at various speeds: cardiac response and effect on steering accuracy. , 1970, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Mb Lerner-Frankiel.  Functional community ambulation : what are your criteria? , 1990 .

[14]  Changes in ambulation parameters in spinal cord injury individuals following rehabilitation , 1990, Paraplegia.

[15]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  D J Sanderson,et al.  Limitations of kinematics in the assessment of wheelchair propulsion in adults and children with spinal cord injury. , 1995, Physical therapy.

[17]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Electromyographic activity of shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion by paraplegic persons. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  R. Waters,et al.  Upper extremity pain in the postrehabilitation spinal cord injured patient. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  M. Pierrynowski,et al.  Arm strength and impulse generation: initiation of wheelchair movement by the physically disabled. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[21]  K. Ottenbacher.  Multiplicity in rehabilitation research: a quantitative assessment. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  G Barnes,et al.  Determinants of gait performance following spinal cord injury. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  H J Hislop,et al.  Energetics: application to the study and management of locomotor disabilities. Energy cost of normal and pathologic gait. , 1978, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[24]  E C Rhodes,et al.  Maximal exercise responses of tetraplegics and paraplegics. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[25]  R A Cooper,et al.  Wheelchair racing sports science: a review. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  G A Wolfe,et al.  Influence of floor surface on the energy cost of wheelchair propulsion. , 1977, Physical therapy.

[27]  B. Ekblom,et al.  Aerobic power during maximal exercise in untrained and well-trained persons with quadriplegia and paraplegia. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[28]  R. Waters,et al.  The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[29]  E E GORDON,et al.  Energy requirements in paraplegic ambulation. , 1956, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  J. Perry,et al.  Temporal-spatial characteristics of wheelchair propulsion. Effects of level of spinal cord injury, terrain, and propulsion rate. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[31]  Smith Gb,et al.  Arm crank vs handrim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses. , 1983 .

[32]  Stauffer Es,et al.  Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation. , 1973 .

[33]  S J Spaulding,et al.  Muscle activity in the spinal cord-injured during wheelchair ambulation. , 1986, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[34]  D J Sanderson,et al.  Kinematic features of wheelchair propulsion. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  C J Newsam,et al.  Isometric shoulder torque in subjects with spinal cord injury. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  H E Veeger,et al.  Wheelchair racing: effects of rim diameter and speed on physiology and technique. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[37]  R Waters,et al.  Walking and wheelchair energetics in persons with paraplegia. , 1980, Physical therapy.

[38]  R. E. Young,et al.  Applied physiology for wheelchair design. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[39]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy‐speed relationship of walking: Standard tables , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.