Framework for the Analysis of the Adaptability, Extensibility, and Scalability of Semantic Information Integration and the Context Mediation Approach

Technological advances such as Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) have increased the feasibility and importance of effectively integrating information from an ever widening number of systems within and across enterprises. A key difficulty of achieving this goal comes from the pervasive heterogeneity in all levels of information systems. A robust solution to this problem needs to be adaptable, extensible, and scalable. In this paper, we identify the deficiencies of traditional semantic integration approaches. The COntext INterchange (COIN) approach overcomes these deficiencies by declaratively representing data semantics and using a mediator to create the necessary conversion programs from a small number of conversion rules. The capabilities of COIN is demonstrated using an example with 150 data sources, where COIN can automatically generate the over 22,000 conversion programs needed to enable semantic interoperability using only six parametizable conversion rules. This paper presents a framework for evaluating adaptability, extensibility, and scalability of semantic integration approaches. The application of the framework is demonstrated with a systematic evaluation of COIN and other commonly practiced approaches.

[1]  A. Sheth,et al.  Information Brokering Across Heterogeneous Digital Data , 2000, Advances in Database Systems.

[2]  Michael Kifer,et al.  Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages , 1995, JACM.

[3]  Stéphane Bressan,et al.  Context Interchange: New Features and Formalisms for the Intelligent Integration of Information Context Interchange: New Features and Formalisms for the Intelligent Integration of Information , 1997 .

[4]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Ontology-Based Integration of Information - A Survey of Existing Approaches , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[5]  Harold Greene,et al.  Lessons Learned From Developing the ABCS 6.4 Solution , 2005 .

[6]  Thom W. Frühwirth,et al.  Theory and Practice of Constraint Handling Rules , 1998, J. Log. Program..

[7]  B. Alberts Human Factors Issues in the National Academies Report Making the Nation Safer : The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism , 2002 .

[8]  Stéphane Bressan,et al.  Context Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in the Context Interchange System , 2015, Applied Intelligence.

[9]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Representing and reasoning about semantic conflicts in heterogeneous information systems , 1997 .

[10]  Arnon Rosenthal,et al.  Data Integration Needs an Industrial Revolution , 2001 .

[11]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  THALIA: Test Harness for the Assessment of Legacy Information Integration Approaches , 2005, 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'05).

[12]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Financial Information Integration in the Presence of Equational Ontological Conflicts , 2002 .

[13]  John L. Dettbarn,et al.  Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. , 2004 .

[14]  M. Howard Williams,et al.  A framework and test-suite for assessing approaches to resolving heterogeneity in distributed databases , 2000, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[15]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Effective information integration and reutilization: solutions to technological deficiency and legal uncertainty , 2005 .

[16]  Antonis C. Kakas,et al.  ACLP: Integrating Abduction and Constraint Solving , 2000, ArXiv.

[17]  Arnon Rosenthal,et al.  From semantic integration to semantics management: case studies and a way forward , 2004, SGMD.

[18]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Information integration using contextual knowledge and ontology merging , 2003 .

[19]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Context Interchange as a Scalable Solution to Interoperating Amongst Heterogeneous Dynamic Services , 2004 .