Assessment in Smart Learning Environments: Psychological factors affecting perceived learning
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Oscar Camacho Nieto,et al. Collaborative learning in postgraduate level courses , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[2] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[3] Rafael Bravo,et al. Analysing teamwork in higher education: an empirical study on the antecedents and consequences of team cohesiveness , 2019 .
[4] Luigi Proserpio,et al. Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..
[5] Rosemary Luckin,et al. Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[6] L. Vos,et al. Marketing simulation games: student and lecturer perspectives , 2010 .
[7] P. Wilcox,et al. ‘It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people’: the role of social support in the first‐year experience of higher education , 2005 .
[8] Leonard A. Annetta,et al. A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[9] Monica L. Forret,et al. Learning The Art of Networking: A Critical Skill for Enhancing Social Capital and Career Success , 2008 .
[10] Joseph P. Robinson. Evidence of a Differential Effect of Ability Grouping on the Reading Achievement Growth of Language-Minority Hispanics , 2008 .
[11] Ana Isabel Canhoto,et al. Learning From Simulation Design to Develop Better Experiential Learning Initiatives , 2016 .
[12] R. Eynon,et al. Digital natives: where is the evidence? , 2010 .
[13] C. Carver,et al. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[14] Mehdi Farashahi,et al. Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations , 2018 .
[15] R. Fuller. The big breach: An experiential learning exercise in mindful crisis communication , 2016 .
[16] Erman Yükseltürk,et al. Team shared mental model as a contributing factor to team performance and students' course satisfaction in blended courses , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[17] Matt Elbeck,et al. Toward Universal Definitions for Direct and Indirect Assessment , 2015 .
[18] Marko Sarstedt,et al. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .
[19] Debra R. Comer,et al. Factors That Affect Students’ Capacity to Fulfill the Role of Online Learner , 2015 .
[20] R. Bosker,et al. The influence of personal networks and social support on study attainment of students in university education , 2008 .
[21] Daniel Bodemer,et al. Group awareness in CSCL environments , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[22] Frederik Beuk,et al. Sales Simulation Games , 2016 .
[23] Y. Lou,et al. Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .
[24] Natalie Simper,et al. Assessing teamwork in undergraduate education: a measurement tool to evaluate individual teamwork skills , 2017 .
[25] Nian-Shing Chen,et al. Evolution Is not enough: Revolutionizing Current Learning Environments to Smart Learning Environments , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
[26] Alexander Serenko,et al. Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: An Empirical Investigation of Online Auction Users , 2011, MIS Q..
[27] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..
[28] Ejaz Ahmed,et al. Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students' Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[29] K. Wentzel,et al. Emotional Support and Expectations From Parents, Teachers, and Peers Predict Adolescent Competence at School , 2016 .
[30] Qimei Chen,et al. Regulatory focus and technology acceptance: Perceived ease of use and usefulness as efficacy , 2018 .
[31] Making It Real: Using a Collaborative Simulation to Teach Crisis Communications , 2012 .
[32] R. Arteaga Sánchez,et al. Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[33] J. P. Maloney,et al. Social support: a conceptual analysis. , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.
[34] Mahmoud Abd Ellatif,et al. A proposed paradigm for smart learning environment based on semantic web , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[35] R. Brennan. Reflecting on Experiential Learning in Marketing Education , 2014 .
[36] A. Girardi,et al. A Systematic Literature Review of Teamwork Pedagogy in Higher Education , 2016 .
[37] Penny Thompson. How digital native learners describe themselves , 2013, Education and Information Technologies.
[38] Kenneth G. Brown,et al. Self-Assessment of Knowledge: A Cognitive Learning or Affective Measure? , 2010 .
[39] Thomas Menkhoff,et al. Enhancing students' learning process through interactive digital media: New opportunities for collaborative learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[40] Rupert Ward,et al. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[41] Ying-Tien Wu,et al. A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants' perceptions , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[42] K. Wentzel. Social Relationships and Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers , 1998 .
[43] Marie Good,et al. Linking academic social environments, ego-identity formation, ego virtues, and academic success. , 2008, Adolescence.
[44] Using Simulations in the Marketing Classroom , 2016 .
[45] A. Burns,et al. Perceived Communication Barriers to Learning with Computer Simulation , 1983 .
[46] Blanka Klimova. Assessment in Smart Learning Environment – A Case Study Approach , 2015 .
[47] Dezhi Wu,et al. Are your users actively involved? A cognitive absorption perspective in mobile training , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[48] S. Folkman,et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology If It Changes It Must Be a Process: Study of Emotion and Coping during Three Stages of a College Examination , 2022 .
[49] Polona Tominc,et al. Impact of support of teacher and compatibility with needs of study on usefulness of SPSS by students , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[50] A. Tymon,et al. The student perspective on employability , 2013 .
[51] Fred D. Davis,et al. Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[52] Jacob Cohen,et al. A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.
[53] M. Levitt,et al. Social support and achievement in childhood and early adolescene: A multicultural study , 1994 .
[54] A. Bandura. Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.
[55] Viswanath Venkatesh,et al. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..
[56] Declan Doyle,et al. Using a business simulation to teach applied skills – the benefits and the challenges of using student teams from multiple countries , 2000 .
[57] Princely Ifinedo,et al. Business undergraduates' perceived use outcomes of Moodle in a blended learning environment: The roles of usability factors and external support , 2018, Telematics Informatics.
[58] Christopher R. Jones,et al. Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? , 2010, Comput. Educ..
[59] Gabriele Frankl,et al. Collaboration Is Smart: Smart Learning Communities , 2013, CHI-KDD.
[60] Mohamed Yeou,et al. An Investigation of Students’ Acceptance of Moodle in a Blended Learning Setting Using Technology Acceptance Model , 2016 .
[61] Szu-Yuan Sun,et al. Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions , 2005, Comput. Educ..
[62] Murat Akçayir,et al. What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980? , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[63] Michael J. Hannafin,et al. Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice , 2011, Comput. Educ..
[64] Jane E. Klobas,et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[65] J. Bernhardt,et al. Designing and Testing an Inventory for Measuring Social Media Competency of Certified Health Education Specialists , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.
[66] B. Weijters,et al. The effect of rating scale format on response styles: the number of response categories and response catgory labels , 2010 .
[67] Steven Shaw,et al. Designing curriculum to shape professional social media skills and identity in virtual communities of practice , 2017, Comput. Educ..
[68] J. Frankham. Employability and higher education: the follies of the ‘Productivity Challenge’ in the Teaching Excellence Framework , 2017 .
[69] D. Bacon. Reporting Actual and Perceived Student Learning in Education Research , 2016 .
[70] T. Wills,et al. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.
[71] Isabel Buil,et al. Exploring students' flow experiences in business simulation games , 2018, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[72] Adolfo Obaya. Getting Cooperative Learning. , 1999 .
[73] Mehdi Darban,et al. Do emotions matter in technology training? Exploring their effects on individual perceptions and willingness to learn , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[74] Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al. Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. , 1999 .
[75] Clement C. Chen,et al. The Association between Students' Style of Learning Preferences, Social Presence, Collaborative Learning and Learning Outcomes. , 2018 .
[76] Ying-Chieh Liu,et al. Self-efficacy as the moderator: Exploring driving factors of perceived social support for mainland Chinese students in Taiwan , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[77] William H. Redmond,et al. On the Duration of Simulations: An Exploration of Minimum Effective Length , 1989 .
[78] L. Lawton,et al. Blissful Ignorance: The Problem of Unrecognized Incompetence and Academic Performance , 2002 .
[79] Kamla Ali Al-Busaidi,et al. An empirical investigation linking learners’ adoption of blended learning to their intention of full e-learning , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[80] James T. Low. Guidelines for the Use of Business Simulation Games , 1980 .
[81] W. Bennis,et al. How business schools lost their way. , 2005, Harvard business review.
[82] Chyan Yang,et al. Why do we blog? From the perspectives of technology acceptance and media choice factors , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[83] Y. Sohn,et al. Effects of grit on academic achievement and career-related attitudes of college students in Korea , 2017 .
[84] Lynn Vos,et al. Effects of Participation in a Simulation Game on Marketing Students’ Numeracy and Financial Skills , 2013 .
[85] D. Bacon. Comparing Direct Versus Indirect Measures of the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Team Testing , 2011 .
[86] R. Bagozzi,et al. On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .
[87] Marko Sarstedt,et al. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .
[88] Jing Lv,et al. Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[89] Joseph F. Hair,et al. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .
[90] Jonathan Michael Spector,et al. Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments , 2014, Smart Learning Environments.
[91] Paul A. Pavlou,et al. Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..
[92] Meredith Ringel Morris,et al. Beyond "social protocols": multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware , 2004, CSCW.
[93] Louis Leung,et al. Multiple determinants of life quality: the roles of Internet activities, use of new media, social support, and leisure activities , 2005, Telematics Informatics.
[94] Christian Steglich,et al. Emergent achievement segregation in freshmen learning community networks , 2018 .
[95] Ashok Ranchhod,et al. Evaluating the educational effectiveness of simulation games: A value generation model , 2014, Inf. Sci..
[96] M. Sarstedt,et al. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .
[97] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[98] A. K. M. Najmul Islam,et al. E-learning system use and its outcomes: Moderating role of perceived compatibility , 2016, Telematics Informatics.
[99] Jonte Bernhard,et al. What matters for students’ learning in the laboratory? Do not neglect the role of experimental equipment! , 2018, Instructional Science.
[100] Guan-Yu Lin,et al. Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system , 2018, Comput. Educ..
[101] Henry Adobor,et al. Management simulations: determining their effectiveness , 2006 .
[102] S. Cobb. Presidential Address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress. , 1976, Psychosomatic medicine.
[103] D. Russell,et al. Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: an attachment theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[104] Matthew J. Xerri,et al. Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective , 2018 .
[105] A. K. M. Najmul Islam,et al. Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context , 2013, Comput. Educ..
[106] Thomas Ashby Wills,et al. Social support and interpersonal relationships. , 1991 .