Prediction of flow stress of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rate compression at elevated temperatures

Abstract An artificial neural network (ANN) constitutive model and Johnson–Cook (J–C) model were developed for 7017 aluminium alloy based on high strain rate data generated from split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiments at various temperatures. A neural network configuration consists of both training and validation, which is effectively employed to predict flow stress. Temperature, strain rate and strain are considered as inputs, whereas flow stress is taken as output of the neural network. A comparative study on Johnson–Cook (J–C) model and neural network model was performed. It was observed that the developed neural network model could predict flow stress under various strain rates and temperatures. The experimental stress–strain data obtained from high strain rate compression tests using SHPB over a range of temperatures (25°–300 °C), strains (0.05–0.3) and strain rates (1500–4500 s−1) were employed to formulate J–C model to predict the flow stress behaviour of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rate loading. The J–C model and the back-propagation ANN model were developed to predict the flow stress of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rates, and their predictability was evaluated in terms of correlation coefficient (R) and average absolute relative error (AARE). R and AARE for the J-C model are found to be 0.8461 and 10.624%, respectively, while R and AARE for the ANN model are 0.9995 and 2.58%, respectively. The predictions of ANN model are observed to be in consistent with the experimental data for all strain rates and temperatures.

[1]  Q. Hou,et al.  A modified Johnson–Cook constitutive model for Mg–Gd–Y alloy extended to a wide range of temperatures , 2010 .

[2]  Akindele Odeshi,et al.  Effect of high strain rate on plastic deformation of a low alloy steel subjected to ballistic impact , 2005 .

[3]  Ying Han,et al.  A comparative study on constitutive relationship of as-cast 904L austenitic stainless steel during hot deformation based on Arrhenius-type and artificial neural network models , 2013 .

[4]  Swadesh Kumar Singh,et al.  Development of constitutive models for dynamic strain aging regime in Austenitic stainless steel 304 , 2013 .

[5]  Chi Feng Lin,et al.  Plastic deformation and fracture behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V alloy loaded with high strain rate under various temperatures , 1998 .

[6]  Swadesh Kumar Singh,et al.  Constitutive models to predict flow stress in Austenitic Stainless Steel 316 at elevated temperatures , 2013 .

[7]  Gérard Gary,et al.  Evaluation of stress–strain curve estimates in dynamic experiments , 2010 .

[8]  Fuguo Li,et al.  A comparative study on Arrhenius-type constitutive model and artificial neural network model to predict high-temperature deformation behaviour in Aermet100 steel , 2011 .

[9]  Y. Lin,et al.  Constitutive descriptions for hot compressed 2124-T851 aluminum alloy over a wide range of temperature and strain rate , 2010 .

[10]  Yunlian Qi,et al.  Development of constitutive relationship model of Ti600 alloy using artificial neural network , 2010 .

[11]  Chi Feng Lin,et al.  The strain rate and temperature dependence of the dynamic impact properties of 7075 aluminum alloy , 2000 .

[12]  E. El-Magd,et al.  Characterization, modelling and simulation of deformation and fracture behaviour of the light-weight wrought alloys under high strain rate loading , 2006 .

[13]  A. Bahrami,et al.  Flow stress optimization for 304 stainless steel under cold and warm compression by artificial neural network and genetic algorithm , 2007 .