Robots Learning to Say `No': Prohibition and Rejective Mechanisms in Acquisition of Linguistic Negation

`No' belongs to the first ten words used by children and embodies the first active form of linguistic negation. Despite its early occurrence the details of its acquisition process remain largely unknown. The circumstance that `no' cannot be construed as a label for perceptible objects or events puts it outside of the scope of most modern accounts of language acquisition. Moreover, most symbol grounding architectures will struggle to ground the word due to its non-referential character. In an experimental study involving the child-like humanoid robot iCub that was designed to illuminate the acquisition process of negation words, the robot is deployed in several rounds of speech-wise unconstrained interaction with na\"ive participants acting as its language teachers. The results corroborate the hypothesis that affect or volition plays a pivotal role in the socially distributed acquisition process. Negation words are prosodically salient within prohibitive utterances and negative intent interpretations such that they can be easily isolated from the teacher's speech signal. These words subsequently may be grounded in negative affective states. However, observations of the nature of prohibitive acts and the temporal relationships between its linguistic and extra-linguistic components raise serious questions over the suitability of Hebbian-type algorithms for language grounding.

[1]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[2]  M. Bowerman The 'no negative evidence' problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? , 1988 .

[3]  Frank Foerster Robots that Say ’No’: Acquisition of Linguistic Behaviour in Interaction Games with Humans , 2013 .

[4]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Jamil Zaki,et al.  Affective cognition: Exploring lay theories of emotion , 2015, Cognition.

[6]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Robot acquisition of lexical meaning - moving towards the two-word stage , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL).

[7]  Jun Tani,et al.  Learning Semantic Combinatoriality from the Interaction between Linguistic and Behavioral Processes , 2005, Adapt. Behav..

[8]  E. Newport MOTHERESE: THE SPEECH OF MOTHERS TO YOUNG CHILDREN. , 1975 .

[9]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Variability in early communicative development. , 1994, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[10]  J. Austin How to do things with words , 1962 .

[11]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Embodied Language Learning and Cognitive Bootstrapping: Methods and Design Principles , 2016 .

[12]  Alexandre Bernardino,et al.  Multimodal saliency-based bottom-up attention a framework for the humanoid robot iCub , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Jamil Zaki,et al.  Computational Models of Emotion Inference in Theory of Mind: A Review and Roadmap , 2018, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Making sense of words: a robotic model for language abstraction , 2016, Autonomous Robots.

[15]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Symbol grounding problem , 1990, Scholarpedia.

[16]  G. Jefferson Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a 'standard maximum' silence of approximately one second in conversation. , 1989 .

[17]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  Memory-Based Language Processing , 2009, Studies in natural language processing.

[18]  Frank Foerster Coding Scheme for Negative Utterances , 2018 .

[19]  David W. Aha,et al.  Lazy Learning , 1997, Springer Netherlands.

[20]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition , 2008, PerMIS.

[21]  R. Spitz No and Yes: On the Genesis of Human Communication , 1966 .

[22]  Deb Roy,et al.  Semiotic schemas: A framework for grounding language in action and perception , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Frank Broz,et al.  Interaction and experience in enactive intelligence and humanoid robotics , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALife).

[24]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  Y. Niv Reinforcement learning in the brain , 2009 .

[26]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Robots That Say “No” Affective Symbol Grounding and the Case of Intent Interpretations , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[27]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[28]  Jeffrey Mark Siskind,et al.  Grounding the Lexical Semantics of Verbs in Visual Perception using Force Dynamics and Event Logic , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[29]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  Three types of early word: the emergence of social words, names and cognitive-relational words in the one-word stage and their relation to cognitive development , 1988 .

[30]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. , 1999, Child development.

[31]  Brian Richards,et al.  Input and interaction in language acquisition: Types of language learner , 1994 .

[32]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Mapping Language to Vision in a Real-World Robotic Scenario , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[33]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Hypothesis Testing and Associative Learning in Cross-Situational Word Learning: Are They One and the Same? , 2007 .

[34]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Learning to talk about events from narrated video in a construction grammar framework , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[35]  Why is a pomegranate an apple? The role of shape, taxonomic relatedness, and prior lexical knowledge in children's overextensions of apple and dog* , 1998 .

[36]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  The acquisition of word semantics by a humanoid robot via interaction with a human tutor , 2011 .

[37]  Luc Steels,et al.  Shared grounding of event descriptions by autonomous robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[38]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Grounding language in action and perception: from cognitive agents to humanoid robots. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.