Numerical simulation of spontaneous rupture processes on twonon-coplanar faults: the effect of geometry on fault interaction

SUMMARY Analyses of earthquake sources have revealed that the earthquake rupture process is complex and that the rupture does not occur on a single plane. Earthquake faults are often composed of several subfaults, and rupture propagation tends to decelerate or terminate at places where the fault strike changes. These observations imply that fault geometry, including fault steps and fault strike change, plays an important role in earthquake rupture complexity. In this paper, we calculate the spontaneous rupture processes of two non-coplanar faults in 2-D in-plane problems, attempting to clarify the eiect of fault geometry. We consider two simple modelsmodels in which two faults are either parallel or perpendicular to each other. We calculate spontaneous rupture propagation on the faults bya ¢nite diierence method, andwe then compare the results. In our simulations, rupture initially grows on the main fault, and stress perturbation from the main rupture then triggers rupture on the secondary fault. Propagation of the main-fault rupture controls a spatio^temporal pattern ofstress diierence in the uniform elastic medium, which determines the rupture process of the secondary fault. The rupture propagation and termination of the secondary fault are signi¢cantly diierent between the two models. The diierence is obvious when rupture of the main fault is arrested and the secondary fault is located near the arrested end of the main fault.When the secondary fault is parallel to the main fault, rupture can propagate ahead on the secondary fault. However, when the secondary fault is perpendicular to the main fault, rupture is either not triggered on the secondary fault, or soon terminates if triggered. This variation of the rupture process implies that fault interaction, depending on geometry, can explain the termination and change of rupture at places where the fault strike varies. This shows the importance of the fault geometry in studying spontaneous dynamic rupture processes.

[1]  A. Aydin,et al.  Surface rupture at a fault bend: the 28 June 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1995 .

[2]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Rupture velocity of plane strain shear cracks , 1976 .

[3]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Dynamics of fault interaction: parallel strike‐slip faults , 1993 .

[4]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New version of the generic mapping tools , 1995 .

[5]  T. Yamashita,et al.  Dynamic nucleation process of shallow earthquake faulting in a fault zone , 1997 .

[6]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Behavior of the Superstition Hills fault during the past 330 years , 1989 .

[7]  H. Quin.  Dynamic stress drop and rupture dynamics of the October 15, 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1990 .

[8]  Michel Bouchon,et al.  Propagation of a shear crack on a nonplanar fault: A method of calculation , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  R. Sibson.  Stopping of earthquake ruptures at dilational fault jogs , 1985, Nature.

[10]  Paul Segall,et al.  Mechanics of discontinuous faults , 1980 .

[11]  Y. Ben‐Zion.  Stress, slip, and earthquakes in models of complex single-fault systems incorporating brittle and creep deformations , 1996 .

[12]  R. Higdon.  Absorbing boundary conditions for elastic waves , 1991 .

[13]  D. Wald,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  Geoffrey C. P. King,et al.  Speculations on the geometry of the initiation and termination processes of earthquake rupture and its relation to morphology and geological structure , 1986 .

[15]  T. Yamashita,et al.  Non‐hypersingular boundary integral equations for two‐dimensional non‐planar crack analysis , 1997 .

[16]  Robert V. Sharp,et al.  Surface faulting along the Superstition Hills fault zone and nearby faults associated with the earthquakes of 24 November 1987 , 1989 .

[17]  Reconstruction of dynamic rupture process of an earthquake with constraints of kinematic parameters , 1992 .

[18]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  A numerical study of two-dimensional spontaneous rupture propagation , 1977 .

[19]  J. Rice.  Spatio‐temporal complexity of slip on a fault , 1993 .

[20]  S. Day.  Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: The effect of nonuniform prestress , 1982, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  B. V. Kostrov,et al.  Selfsimilar problems of propagation of shear cracks , 1964 .

[22]  T. Yamashita,et al.  Earthquake rupture complexity due to dynamic nucleation and interaction of subsidiary faults , 1994 .

[23]  C. Scholz.  The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting , 1990 .

[24]  A. Barka,et al.  Slip distribution along the North Anatolian fault associated with the large earthquakes of the period 1939 to 1967 , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[25]  C. R. Allen,et al.  San Fernando Earthquake series, 1971: Focal mechanisms and tectonics , 1973 .

[26]  D. Boore,et al.  Control of rupture by fault geometry during the 1966 parkfield earthquake , 1981 .

[27]  GEOFFREY KING,et al.  Role of Fault Bends in the Initiation and Termination of Earthquake Rupture , 1985, Science.