The mediating effect of task presentation on collaboration and children’s acquisition of scientific reasoning

There has been considerable research concerning peer interaction and the acquisition of children’s scientific reasoning. This study investigated differences in collaborative activity between pairs of children working around a computer with pairs of children working with physical apparatus and related any differences to the development of children’s scientific reasoning. Children aged between 9 and 10 years old (48 boys and 48 girls) were placed into either same ability or mixed ability pairs according to their individual, pre-test performance on a scientific reasoning task. These pairs then worked on either a computer version or a physical version of Inhelder and Piaget’s (1958) chemical combination task. Type of presentation was found to mediate the nature and type of collaborative activity. The mixed-ability pairs working around the computer talked proportionally more about the task and management of the task; had proportionally more transactive discussions and used the record more productively than children working with the physical apparatus. Type of presentation was also found to mediated children’s learning. Children in same ability pairs who worked with the physical apparatus improved significantly more than same ability pairs who worked around the computer. These findings were partially predicted from a socio-cultural theory and show the importance of tools for mediating collaborative activity and collaborative learning.

[1]  Dorothy Miell,et al.  Settling into school: The importance of early friendships for the development of children's social understanding and communicative competence , 1993 .

[2]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Learning with computers: analysing productive interaction , 1999 .

[3]  J. Wertsch.  The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[4]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Self-Directed Activity and Cognitive Development* , 1980 .

[5]  M. Azmitia,et al.  Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning , 1993 .

[6]  R. H. Walters.  The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence , 1960 .

[7]  A. C. Kruger.  The Effect of Peer and Adult-Child Transactive Discussions on Moral Reasoning , 1992 .

[8]  Jan Hawkins,et al.  Microcomputers in schools: Impact on the social life of elementary classrooms , 1982 .

[9]  R. Cummings.  Small-Group Discussions and the Microcomputer. , 1985 .

[10]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Gender, Pair Composition and Computer Versus Paper Presentations of an English Language Task , 2000 .

[11]  Stephanie D. Teasley.  Constructing a Joint Problem Space: The Computer as a Tool for Sharing Knowledge , 1993 .

[12]  Karen Littleton,et al.  The Effects of Gender, Expectations of Success and Social Comparison on Children's Performance on a Computer‐based Task , 1998 .

[13]  Neville Bennett,et al.  The Nature and Quality of Talk in Co-Operative Classroom Groups. , 1991 .

[14]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Social processes in children's learning , 1999 .

[15]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  Productive interaction in the context of computer-supported collaborative learning in science , 1999 .

[16]  Dorothy Miell,et al.  Social interaction and personal relationships , 1996 .

[17]  L. Vygotsky.  Genesis of the higher mental functions. , 1991 .

[18]  H. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Mediated Activity in the Primary Classroom: Girls, Boys and Computers , 2000 .

[19]  J. Tudge,et al.  Can young children benefit from collaborative problem solving? Tracing the effects of partner competence and feedback , 1993 .

[20]  Danièle Golay Schilter,et al.  Sociocognitive interactions in a computerised industrial task: are they productive for learning , 1999 .

[21]  S. Järvelä,et al.  The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction , 1995 .

[22]  Rose J. Dimant,et al.  Development of formal reasoning during successive peer interactions. , 1991 .

[23]  C. Myers.  Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[24]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Computers and the collaborative experience of learning , 1995 .

[25]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Learning with computers: analysing productive interaction , 1999 .

[26]  Hans Spada,et al.  Learning in Humans and Machines , 1995 .