Is who you are who you're talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions.

To investigate interpersonal theory, the authors examined the social behavior of 112 previously unacquainted male-female pairs collaborating on a joint task. Structural equation modeling analyses provided clear evidence of complementarity: In addition to trait affiliation and dominance both predicting situational behavior, each interaction partner's behavior influenced the other's in accordance with the theory, eliciting similar levels of affiliation and opposite levels of dominance. There were also clear biases related to participants' interpersonal traits: When behavior, as indexed by observers, was held constant, more trait affiliative participants tended to view themselves and their partner as warmer during the interaction; likewise, more trait dominant participants perceived themselves to act more dominantly than they actually did. Throughout, there were no sex differences.

[1]  R. Carson.  Interaction Concepts of Personality , 2019 .

[2]  T. Tracey,et al.  Complementarity of Interpersonal Circumplex Traits , 2001 .

[3]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship , 2001 .

[4]  Kathryn Dindia,et al.  Sex differences and similarities in communication : critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction , 1999 .

[5]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  Egoistic and Moralistic Biases in Self-Perception: The Interplay of Self-Deceptive Styles With Basic Traits and Motives , 1998 .

[6]  M. Mongrain,et al.  Perceptual biases, affect, and behavior in the relationships of dependents and self-critics. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[8]  S. Nowicki,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative and Competitive Instructions on the Performance of Friendly and Hostile Complementary Mixed-Sex Dyads ☆ ☆☆ , 1997 .

[9]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  Sex and Gender Differences in Personal Relationships , 1997 .

[10]  R. Hoyle.  Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[11]  D. Christopher Dryer,et al.  When Do Opposites Attract? Interpersonal Complementarity Versus Similarity , 1997 .

[12]  B. O'Connor,et al.  Interpersonal rigidity, hostility, and complementarity in musical bands , 1997 .

[13]  D. Funder,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of personality judgements by the self and knowledgeable others. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Models of Non-Independence in Dyadic Research , 1996 .

[15]  Michael J. Cody,et al.  Gender, power, and communication in human relationships , 1996 .

[16]  John L. Holland,et al.  Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. , 1996 .

[17]  R. Carson.  Seamlessness in personality and its derangements. , 1996, Journal of personality assessment.

[18]  E. Aries,et al.  Men and Women in Interaction: Reconsidering the Differences , 1996 .

[19]  D. Kiesler,et al.  Assessing the interpersonal transaction cycle: convergence of action and reaction interpersonal circumplex measures. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  D. Moskowitz,et al.  Do interpersonal traits predict affect? A comparison of three models. , 1995 .

[21]  T. Tracey,et al.  An examination of the complementarity of interpersonal behavior. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the big five. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  D. K. Marcus,et al.  Interpersonal perception in group therapy: a social relations analysis. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[24]  D. Tannen.  Gender and conversational interaction , 1994 .

[25]  D. Moskowitz.  Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. , 1994 .

[26]  D. Moskowitz.  Dominance and Friendliness: On the Interaction of Gender and Situation. , 1993 .

[27]  Daniel J. Canary,et al.  Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication , 1993 .

[28]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Interpersonal Complementarity, Gender of Interactants, and Performance on Puzzle and Word Tasks , 1992 .

[29]  Michael Monsour.  Meanings of Intimacy in Cross- and Same-Sex Friendships , 1992 .

[30]  T. van de Pasch.  [Sex and power]. , 1992, TVZ : het vakblad voor de verpleging.

[31]  T. Stiles,et al.  Predicting patient change from therapist competence and patient-therapist complementarity in short-term anxiety-provoking psychotherapy: a pilot study. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[32]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Interpersonal complementarity and time of interaction in female relationships , 1991 .

[33]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Self-derogations and the interpersonal theory. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  H. Strupp,et al.  Patient and therapist introject, interpersonal process, and differential psychotherapy outcome. , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  T. Widiger,et al.  Interpersonal complementarity and individual differences. , 1990 .

[36]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Circular reasoning about interpersonal behavior: Evidence concerning some untested assumptions underlying diagnostic classification. , 1989 .

[37]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Gender differences in friendship patterns , 1988 .

[38]  H. de Vries,et al.  The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: a test of complementarity and anticomplementarity. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  K. Dodge,et al.  Hostile attributional biases among aggressive boys are exacerbated under conditions of threats to the self. , 1987, Child development.

[40]  Jim Orford,et al.  The Rules of Interpersonal Complementarity: Does Hostility Beget Hostility and Dominance, Submission?. , 1986 .

[41]  L. Ingraham,et al.  A social relations model test of the interpersonal circle. , 1986 .

[42]  D. Moskowitz.  Comparison of self-reports, reports by knowledgeable informants, and behavioral observation data , 1986 .

[43]  H. Strupp,et al.  Structural analysis of social behavior: application to a study of interpersonal process in differential psychotherapeutic outcome. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[44]  P. Kollock,et al.  Sex and Power in Interaction: Conversational Privileges and Duties , 1985 .

[45]  D. Kiesler.  The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. , 1983 .

[46]  M. Hersen,et al.  Progress in Behavior Modification , 1983 .

[47]  J. Hokanson,et al.  The effects of another person's response style on interpersonal behavior in depression. , 1983, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[48]  L. A. Peplau,et al.  Sex differences in same-sex friendship , 1982 .

[49]  D. Moskowitz,et al.  Validity comparison of behavior counts and ratings by knowledgeable informants. , 1982 .

[50]  D. Jackson,et al.  Personality structure and the circumplex. , 1979 .

[51]  F. Nye,et al.  Social Exchange in Developing Relationships , 1979 .

[52]  N. Abeles,et al.  Client-Therapist Complementarity and Therapeutic Outcome. , 1975 .

[53]  L. Benjamin.  Structural analysis of social behavior. , 1974 .

[54]  B. Guerney,et al.  Interpersonal effects of interpersonal behavior. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  H. B. Adams.  "Mental illness" or interpersonal behavior? , 1964 .

[56]  J. Altrocchi.  Dominance as a factor in interpersonal choice and perception. , 1959, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[57]  T. W. Anderson.  Maximum Likelihood Estimates for a Multivariate Normal Distribution when Some Observations are Missing , 1957 .

[58]  H. S. Sullivan.  Conceptions of modern psychiatry , 2005, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[59]  J. Gray.  Men are from Mars, women are from Venus : the classic guide to understanding the opposite sex , 2004 .

[60]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some universals in language use [Reprint] , 1999 .

[62]  D. Canary,et al.  Conversational maintenance behaviors of husbands and wives: An observational analysis. , 1998 .

[63]  H. Conte,et al.  Circumplex models of personality and emotions , 1997 .

[64]  D. Christopher Dryer,et al.  The circumplex structure of interpersonal problems. , 1997 .

[65]  M. Levesque,et al.  Meta-accuracy among acquainted individuals: a social relations analysis of interpersonal perception and metaperception. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[67]  A. Mulac,et al.  Women's style in problem solving interaction: Powerless, or simply feminine? , 1995 .

[68]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies , 1995 .

[69]  A. Pincus.  The interpersonal circumplex and the interpersonal theory: Perspectives on personality and its pathology. , 1994 .

[70]  M. Lorr,et al.  Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality , 1994 .

[71]  G. Tasca,et al.  Interpersonal complementarity and antitheses within a stage model of psychotherapy , 1992 .

[72]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  Handbook of social and clinical psychology : the health perspective , 1991 .

[73]  D. Tannen.  You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow , 1990 .

[74]  Debbie S. Moskowitz,et al.  Convergence of self-reports and independent observers : dominance and friendliness , 1990 .

[75]  N. Dirubbo.  Gender in Intimate Relationships , 1990 .

[76]  D. Kiesler,et al.  Interpersonal complementarity and the therapeutic alliance: A study of relationship in psychotherapy. , 1989 .

[77]  P. Brown,et al.  Politeness: some universals in language usage , 1987 .

[78]  A. Auerbach.  Handbook of Interpersonal Psychotherapy , 1985 .

[79]  Philip C. Kendall,et al.  Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology , 1982 .

[80]  L. Benjamin,et al.  Whatever happened to interpersonal diagnosis? A psychosocial alternative to DSM-III. , 1979, The American psychologist.

[81]  R. Carson.  9 – Personality and Exchange in Developing Relationships , 1979 .

[82]  S. Beck,et al.  The Therapist-Client Relationship in Behavior Therapy , 1978 .

[83]  A. Gurman,et al.  Effective psychotherapy : a handbook of research , 1977 .

[84]  D. Magnusson,et al.  Personality at the crossroads : current issues in interactional psychology , 1977 .

[85]  E. Foa,et al.  Societal Structures of the Mind , 1974 .

[86]  T. Leary.  Interpersonal diagnosis of personality , 1957 .

[87]  H. S. Sullivan.  The interpersonal theory of psychiatry , 1953 .