OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to compare the value of a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequence with optimized fast spin-echo and conventional fast spin-echo techniques in evaluation of the uterus.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Optimized fast spin-echo imaging was compared with fast spin-echo and HASTE imaging, for both image quality and ability to assess the zonal anatomy of the uterus, in 40 volunteers. In optimized fast spin-echo imaging, the imaging time was reduced using partial-Fourier reconstruction, reducing the echo spacing, and increasing the echo train length.
RESULTS
HASTE imaging offered the least motion artifact of all techniques. On optimized fast spin-echo imaging, motion artifacts were moderate to severe in 10% of patients. On fast spin-echo imaging, motion artifacts were moderate to severe in 40% of patients. Optimized fast spin-echo imaging was superior to the other two techniques in terms of anatomic sharpness and overall image quality.
CONCLUSION
Although HASTE imaging offers the unique feature of providing images free of motion artifacts, optimized fast spin-echo imaging appears to be the preferred technique for T2-weighted imaging of the uterus.