Temperate urban wetland plankton community stability driven by environmental variables, biodiversity, and resource use efficiency: A case of Hulanhe Wetland

In this study, we explored the driving factors behind plankton community structure. Due to the rapid development of cities, the occupation and development of wetland resources have increased lately, making the urban wetland ecosystems unstable and degrading the ecological functions gradually. Understanding the driving factors behind plankton community structure has certain theoretical and guiding significance for the protection, sustainable development, and ecological restoration of aquatic biodiversity in urban wetland ecosystems. We set up 12 sampling points in the Hulanhe Wetland, with the continuous monitoring of plankton from April to August and October 2021. The eco-environmental factors, plankton community structure, biodiversity index, resource use efficiency (RUE), and Bray–Curtis community turnover value were analyzed. A total of 209 species of 91 genera, 42 families, 11 classes, 22 orders of phytoplankton, and 90 species of four classes of zooplankton were identified. The community structure was mainly composed of Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta, Protozoa, and Rotifera. To explore the correlation between phytoplankton and zooplankton, a correlation study was performed. We found a stable feeding preference between phytoplankton and zooplankton. The key influencing factors were identified by ordinary least squares regression, and the main driving factors of plankton community structure were discussed. The results showed that the stability of the Increased biodiversity and resource utilization efficiency have led to more stable plankton communities. This stability pattern is also strongly affected by water temperature, pH and total nitrogen in the external environment. This study will be helpful in the restoration of damaged wetlands, which would be beneficial for the protection of urban wetland ecosystems.

[1]  Yawen Fan,et al.  [Characteristics of Benthic Diatom Community Structure and Water Ecological Health Evaluation in the Lalin River Basin]. , 2023, Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue.

[2]  Yan Liu,et al.  Differences in planktonic and benthic diatoms reflect water quality during a rainstorm event in the Songhua River Basin of northeast China , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[3]  A. Mougi Predator interference and complexity–stability in food webs , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[4]  L. Junfeng,et al.  Spatial-temporal characteristics of zooplankton community structure and analysis for the impact factors in the Shanmei Reservoir,Fujian Province , 2022, Journal of Lake Sciences.

[5]  P. Van Cappellen,et al.  Economic valuation of suspended sediment and phosphorus filtration services by four different wetland types: A preliminary assessment for southern Ontario, Canada , 2021, Hydrological Processes.

[6]  Song-Qi Yang,et al.  [Analysis of Phytoplankton Community Stability and Influencing Factors in a Tributary of the Three Gorges Reservoir]. , 2021, Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue.

[7]  E. Laws,et al.  Temperature Dependence of Freshwater Phytoplankton Growth Rates and Zooplankton Grazing Rates , 2021, Water.

[8]  M. Zhang,et al.  The underlying causes and effects of phytoplankton seasonal turnover on resource use efficiency in freshwater lakes , 2021, Ecology and evolution.

[9]  Shutang Liu,et al.  Stability analysis of the plankton community with advection , 2021 .

[10]  Tsuyoshi Kobayashi,et al.  Planktonic Metabolism and Microbial Carbon Substrate Utilization in Response to Inundation in Semi‐Arid Floodplain Wetlands , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[11]  贾鹏,范亚文,陆欣鑫 Jia Peng Analysis of phytoplankton structure based on different functional groups in Hulanhe Wetland , 2021 .

[12]  Yuxuan Zhao,et al.  Urbanization has changed the distribution pattern of zooplankton species diversity and the structure of functional groups , 2021 .

[13]  N. Fohrer,et al.  Structural Characteristics and Driving Factors of the Planktonic Eukaryotic Community in the Danjiangkou Reservoir, China , 2020, Water.

[14]  Da Zhang,et al.  Impacts of Land Use Changes on Wetland Ecosystem Services in the Tumen River Basin , 2020, Sustainability.

[15]  A. N. Moura,et al.  Ecological impacts of freshwater algal blooms on water quality, plankton biodiversity, structure, and ecosystem functioning. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Kwanwoo Kim,et al.  The Contribution of Small Phytoplankton Communities to the Total Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen Assimilation Rates in the East/Japan Sea: An Experimental Evaluation , 2020 .

[17]  Weisong Zhou,et al.  Global analysis and optimal harvesting for a hybrid stochastic phytoplankton-zooplankton-fish model with distributed delays. , 2020, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[18]  C. Elton The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 2020 .

[19]  G. S. Kumar,et al.  Role of eddies in structuring the mesozooplankton composition in coastal waters of the western Bay of Bengal , 2019, Ecological Indicators.

[20]  M. Celussi,et al.  Effect of an extreme cold event on the metabolism of planktonic microbes in the northernmost basin of the Mediterranean Sea , 2019, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science.

[21]  M. Kučera,et al.  Global change drives modern plankton communities away from the pre-industrial state , 2019, Nature.

[22]  S. Villéger,et al.  Interspecific differences in the effect of fish on marine microbial plankton , 2019, Aquatic Microbial Ecology.

[23]  Cole G Easson,et al.  Depth-Dependent Environmental Drivers of Microbial Plankton Community Structure in the Northern Gulf of Mexico , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[24]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Biodiversity increases and decreases ecosystem stability , 2018, Nature.

[25]  R. Ptáčník,et al.  Plankton metacommunities in floodplain wetlands under contrasting hydrological conditions , 2018, Freshwater biology.

[26]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Pollution tolerant protozoa in polluted wetland. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[27]  S. Jang,et al.  Dynamical behavior of systems of two phytoplankton and one zooplankton populations with toxin producing phytoplankton , 2017 .

[28]  J. Ransangan,et al.  Effects of nutrients and zooplankton on the phytoplankton community structure in Marudu Bay , 2017 .

[29]  A. N. Moura,et al.  Effects of zooplankton and nutrients on phytoplankton: an experimental analysis in a eutrophic tropical reservoir , 2017 .

[30]  Huayong Zhang,et al.  Biodiversity effects on resource use efficiency and community turnover of plankton in Lake Nansihu, China , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[31]  J. Fleskes,et al.  Projected Impacts of Climate, Urbanization, Water Management, and Wetland Restoration on Waterbird Habitat in California’s Central Valley , 2017, PloS one.

[32]  Yu Hong-xian,et al.  Zooplankton community structure characters and water quality assessment in Harbin section of Songhua River , 2017 .

[33]  Zhu Weiju,et al.  Phytoplankton community structure and the evaluation of water quality in spring, Huaihe River Basin , 2017 .

[34]  安. Rui,et al.  Seasonal dynamics of zooplankton functional groups and their relationships with environmental factors in the sanhuanpao wetland reserve , 2017 .

[35]  Huayong Zhang,et al.  Effects of Environmental Factors on the Temporal Stability of Phytoplankton Biomass in a Eutrophic Man-Made Lake , 2016 .

[36]  Huayong Zhang,et al.  Stability of food webs to biodiversity loss: Comparing the roles of biomass and node degree , 2016 .

[37]  C. Schaum,et al.  Environmental stability affects phenotypic evolution in a globally distributed marine picoplankton , 2015, The ISME Journal.

[38]  Z. Nannan,et al.  Relationships between phytoplankton community in different functional regions and environmental factors in Zhalong Wetland, Heilongjiang Province , 2016 .

[39]  M. Pedersen,et al.  Development of phytoplankton communities: Implications of nutrient injections on phytoplankton composition, pH and ecosystem production , 2015 .

[40]  Senjie Lin,et al.  Molecular analysis of in situ diets of coral reef copepods: evidence of terrestrial plant detritus as a food source in Sanya Bay, China , 2015 .

[41]  H. Segers,et al.  Spatial dissimilarities in plankton structure and function during flood pulses in a semi-arid floodplain wetland system , 2015, Hydrobiologia.

[42]  Adam J. Heathcote,et al.  Cyanobacteria dominance influences resource use efficiency and community turnover in phytoplankton and zooplankton communities. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[43]  Xiaochang C. Wang,et al.  Hybrid constructed wetlands for highly polluted river water treatment and comparison of surface- and subsurface-flow cells. , 2014, Journal of environmental sciences.

[44]  Chen Qia Characteristics of the Zooplankton Communities in Four Typical Wetlands of Macao , 2014 .

[45]  刘艳 Liu Yan,et al.  Relationships between environmental variables and seasonal succession in phytoplankton functional groups in the Hulan River Wetland , 2014 .

[46]  Markus Fischer,et al.  More diverse plant communities have higher functioning over time due to turnover in complementary dominant species , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  C. Sayer,et al.  Zooplankton as indicators in lakes: a scientific-based plea for including zooplankton in the ecological quality assessment of lakes according to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[48]  N. Shiponeni Introduction to ecology , 2011 .

[49]  F. Yawen,et al.  Algae community structure and distribution in Hulanhe Wetland,Heilongjiang Province , 2011 .

[50]  Wang Wu The variation and analysis of rotifer community structure in and out of crab-net-pen closing in the Yangcheng Lake , 2011 .

[51]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress , 2009, Nature.

[52]  P. Chow-Fraser,et al.  Comparative study of ecological indices for assessing human-induced disturbance in coastal wetlands of the Laurentian Great Lakes , 2009 .

[53]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. , 2008, Ecology.

[54]  Robert Ptacnik,et al.  Diversity predicts stability and resource use efficiency in natural phytoplankton communities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[56]  M. Prast,et al.  Concentration of fixed plankton samples via settling: how long is long enough? , 2007 .

[57]  K. Shin,et al.  Seasonal variations in phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing in a temperate coastal embayment, Korea , 2007 .

[58]  R. Relyea THE IMPACT OF INSECTICIDES AND HERBICIDES ON THE BIODIVERSITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF AQUATIC COMMUNITIES , 2006 .

[59]  Alan E. Wilson,et al.  Effects of cyanobacterial toxicity and morphology on the population growth of freshwater zooplankton: Meta‐analyses of laboratory experiments , 2006 .

[60]  R. Spooner,et al.  Abnormal expression of normal transferrin alleles in cattle , 2005, Biochemical Genetics.

[61]  P. Burkill,et al.  Microzooplankton grazing in Phaeocystis and diatom-dominated waters in the southern North Sea in spring , 2004 .

[62]  H. Arndt Rotifers as predators on components of the microbial web (bacteria, heterotrophic flagellates, ciliates) — a review , 1993, Hydrobiologia.

[63]  E. Sennhauser,et al.  The concept of stability in connection with the gallery forests of the Chaco region , 1991, Vegetatio.

[64]  Hongbin Liu,et al.  Interactions between nutrients, phytoplankton growth, and micro- and mesozooplankton grazing in the plume of the Mississippi River , 2003 .

[65]  D. Pearce,et al.  Short-term stability of the microbial community structure in a maritime Antarctic lake , 2002, Polar Biology.

[66]  T. Nielsen,et al.  Zooplankton feeding ecology: grazing on phytoplankton and predation on protozoans by copepod and barnacle nauplii in Disko Bay, West Greenland , 2001 .

[67]  J Norberg,et al.  Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: A theoretical framework , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  M. Schallenberg,et al.  Calanoid copepods versus cladocerans: Consumer effects on protozoa in lakes of different trophic status , 2001 .

[69]  D. Tilman THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[70]  Steen Magnussen,et al.  Estimating sample size for inference about the Shannon-Weaver and the Simpson Indices of species diversity , 1995 .

[71]  M. Vanni,et al.  Seasonal patterns of grazing and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in a eutrophic lake , 1990 .

[72]  John R. Post,et al.  BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN IMPACTS ON FRESHWATER PELAGIC COMMUNITY STRUCTURE' , 1989 .

[73]  A. Boucot,et al.  The complexity and stability of ecosystems , 1985, Nature.

[74]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[75]  K. Porter Selective Grazing and Differential Digestion of Algae by Zooplankton , 1973, Nature.

[76]  MEASUREMENT OF MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTILITY , 1972 .

[77]  E. C. Pielou The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections , 1966 .

[78]  R. Macarthur Fluctuations of Animal Populations and a Measure of Community Stability , 1955 .