Multi-electron systems in strong magnetic fields II: A fixed-phase diffusion quantum Monte Carlo application based on trial functions from a Hartree-Fock-Roothaan method

Abstract We present a quantum Monte Carlo application for the computation of energy eigenvalues for atoms and ions in strong magnetic fields. The required guiding wave functions are obtained with the Hartree–Fock–Roothaan code described in the accompanying publication (Schimeczek and Wunner, 2014). Our method yields highly accurate results for the binding energies of symmetry subspace ground states and at the same time provides a means for quantifying the quality of the results obtained with the above-mentioned Hartree–Fock–Roothaan method. Program summary Program title: Manteca Catalogue identifier: AETV_v1_0 Program summary URL: http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AETV_v1_0.html Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen’s University, Belfast, N. Ireland Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 72 284 No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 604 948 Distribution format: tar.gz Programming language: C++. Computer: Cluster of 1– ∼ 500 HP Compaq dc5750. Operating system: Linux. Has the code been vectorized or parallelized?: Yes. Code includes MPI directives. RAM: 500 MB per node Classification: 2.1. External routines: Boost::Serialization, Boost::MPI, LAPACK BLAS Nature of problem: Quantitative modelings of features observed in the X-ray spectra of isolated neutron stars are hampered by the lack of sufficiently large and accurate databases for atoms and ions up to the last fusion product iron, at high magnetic field strengths. The predominant amount of line data in the literature has been calculated with Hartree–Fock methods, which are intrinsically restricted in precision. Our code is intended to provide a powerful tool for calculating very accurate energy values from, and thereby improving the quality of, existing Hartree–Fock results. Solution method: The Fixed-phase quantum Monte Carlo method is used in combination with guiding functions obtained in Hartree–Fock calculations. The guiding functions are created from single-electron orbitals ψ i which are either products of a wave function in the z -direction (the direction of the magnetic field) and an expansion of the wave function perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field in terms of Landau states, ψ i ( ρ , φ , z ) = P i ( z ) ∑ n = 0 N L t i n ϕ n i ( ρ , φ ) , or a full two-dimensional expansion using separate z -wave functions for each Landau level, i.e. ψ i ( ρ , φ , z ) = ∑ n = 0 N L P n i ( z ) ϕ n i ( ρ , φ ) . In the first form, the t i n are expansion coefficients, and the expansion is cut off at some maximum Landau level quantum number N L . In the second form, the expansion coefficients are contained in the respective P n i . Restrictions: The method itself is very flexible and not restricted to a certain interval of magnetic field strengths. However, it is only variational for the lowest-lying state in each symmetry subspace and the accompanying Hartree–Fock method can only obtain guiding functions in the regime of strong magnetic fields. Unusual features: The program needs approximate wave functions computed with another method as input. Running time: 1 min–several days. The example provided takes approximately 50 min to run on 1 processor.

[1]  G. Wunner,et al.  Hartree-Fock-Roothaan calculations for many-electron atoms and ions in neutron-star magnetic fields , 2008 .

[2]  D. Ceperley,et al.  Released-phase quantum Monte Carlo method , 1997 .

[3]  Paul R. C. Kent,et al.  Monte Carlo energy and variance-minimization techniques for optimizing many-body wave functions , 1999 .

[4]  D. Engel Hartree-Fock-Roothaan-Rechnungen für Vielelektronen-Atome in Neutronenstern-Magnetfeldern , 2007 .

[5]  R. Needs,et al.  Jastrow correlation factor for atoms, molecules, and solids , 2004, 0801.0378.

[6]  C. Umrigar,et al.  A diffusion Monte Carlo algorithm with very small time-step errors , 1993 .

[7]  The helium atom in a strong magnetic field , 1999, physics/9902059.

[8]  Lucas K. Wagner,et al.  Quantum Monte Carlo for Ab Initio calculations of energy‐relevant materials , 2014 .

[9]  Hongjun Luo Complete optimisation of multi-configuration Jastrow wave functions by variational transcorrelated method. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  Carlson Green's function Monte Carlo study of light nuclei. , 1987, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[11]  Sebastian Boblest,et al.  Ground states of helium to neon and their ions in strong magnetic fields , 2014 .

[12]  William A. Goddard,et al.  An optimized initialization algorithm to ensure accuracy in quantum Monte Carlo calculations , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Chien-Jung Huang C. J. Umrigar M.P. Nightingale Accuracy of electronic wave functions in quantum Monte Carlo: The effect of high-order correlations , 1997, cond-mat/9703008.

[14]  P. Schmelcher,et al.  Higher-angular-momentum states of the helium atom in a strong magnetic field , 2001 .

[15]  C. Schimeczek,et al.  Multi-electron systems in strong magnetic fields I: The 2D Landau-Hartree-Fock-Roothaan method , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[16]  S. Fahy Quantum Monte Carlo Methods , 1996 .

[17]  C. Schimeczek,et al.  A highly optimized code for calculating atomic data at neutron star magnetic field strengths using a doubly self-consistent Hartree-Fock-Roothaan method , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[18]  M P Nightingale,et al.  Optimization of ground- and excited-state wave functions and van der Waals clusters. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[19]  F. Reboredo Many-body calculations of low-energy eigenstates in magnetic and periodic systems with self-healing diffusion Monte Carlo: steps beyond the fixed phase. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  Sebastian Boblest,et al.  Atomic ground states in strong magnetic fields: Electron configurations and energy levels , 2013 .

[21]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[22]  D. Ceperley,et al.  New stochastic method for systems with broken time-reversal symmetry: 2D fermions in a magnetic field. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[23]  L. Schiff,et al.  Theory of the Quadratic Zeeman Effect , 1939 .

[24]  R. T. Pack,et al.  Cusp Conditions for Molecular Wavefunctions , 1966 .

[25]  C J Umrigar,et al.  Full optimization of Jastrow-Slater wave functions with application to the first-row atoms and homonuclear diatomic molecules. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  C. Coulson,et al.  Electron Correlation in the Ground State of Helium , 1961 .

[27]  A. R. Edmonds THE THEORY OF THE QUADRATIC ZEEMAN EFFECT , 1970 .

[28]  G. Wunner,et al.  A fast parallel code for calculating energies and oscillator strengths of many-electron atoms at neutron star magnetic field strengths in adiabatic approximation , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[29]  Claudia Filippi,et al.  Alleviation of the Fermion-sign problem by optimization of many-body wave functions. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[30]  R. Needs,et al.  Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids , 2001 .

[31]  Tosio Kato,et al.  On the Eigenfunctions of Many-Particle Systems in Quantum Mechanics , 2011 .

[32]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods in Ab Initio Quantum Chemistry , 1995 .