Method of evaluating image-recovery algorithms based on task performance

A method of evaluating image-recovery algorithms is presented that is based on the numerical computation of how well a specified visual task can be performed on the basis of the reconstructed images. A Monte Carlo technique is used to simulate the complete imaging process including generation of scenes appropriate to the desired application, subsequent data taking, image recovery, and performance of the stated task based on the final image. The pseudorandom-simulation process permits one to assess the response of an image-recovery algorithm to many different realizations of the same type of scene. The usefulness of this method is demonstrated through a study of the algebraic reconstruction technique (ART), a tomographic reconstruction algorithm that reconstructs images from their projections. The task chosen for this study is the detection of disks of known size and position. Task performance is rated on the basis of the detectability index derived from the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In the imaging situations explored, the use of the nonnegativity constraint in the ART dramatically increases the detectability of objects in some instances, particularly when the data consist of a limited number of noiseless projections. Conversely, the nonnegativity constraint does not improve detectability when the data are complete but noisy.

[1]  Charles E. Metz,et al.  On The Multiplex Advantage Of Coded Source/Aperture Photon Imaging , 1981, Other Conferences.

[2]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Variations In Task And The Ideal Observer , 1983, Other Conferences.

[3]  A Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. III. On Bayesian use of prior knowledge and cross correlation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  K. M. Hanson,et al.  THE DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY OF CT RECONSTRUCTION: THE DETECTION OF SMALL OBJECTS , 1980 .

[5]  K M Hanson,et al.  On the Optimality of the Filtered Backprojection Algorithm , 1980, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Higher-order tasks: Human vs. machine performance , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[7]  G. W. Wecksung,et al.  Local basis-function approach to computed tomography. , 1985, Applied optics.

[8]  K. Hanson,et al.  Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.

[9]  J. Swets ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[10]  Nirode Mohanty,et al.  Detection of Signals , 1987 .

[11]  K. M. Hanson,et al.  Method To Evaluate Image-Recovery Algorithms Based On Task Performance , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[13]  P. Gilbert Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  G. Herman,et al.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Y. Censor,et al.  Strong underrelaxation in Kaczmarz's method for inconsistent systems , 1983 .

[16]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[17]  A. Simpson,et al.  What is the best index of detectability? , 1973, Psychological Bulletin.

[18]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Efficient Utilization Of Aperture And Detector By Optimal Coding , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Vayesian and Related Methods in Image Reconstruction from Incomplete Data , 1987 .

[20]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Detection And Discrimination Of Known Signals In Inhomogeneous, Random Backgrounds , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Optimization for Object Localization of the Constrained Algebraic Reconstruction Technique , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[23]  K. M. Hztnson Method to evaluate image-recovery algorithms based on task performance , 1988 .

[24]  K. M. Hanson,et al.  POPART - Performance Optimized Algebraic Reconstruction Technique , 1988, Other Conferences.

[25]  I. Good Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications , 1983 .

[26]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Relaxation methods for image reconstruction , 1978, CACM.

[27]  A. Lent,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithms. , 1976, Computers in biology and medicine.

[28]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 1981 .

[29]  B. R. Hunt,et al.  Digital Image Restoration , 1977 .

[30]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.