Accuracy and traceability in environmental monitoring--pitfalls in methylmercury determinations as a case study.

The concepts of accuracy and traceability as applied to environmental analysis are still prone to misunderstandings. While accuracy refers to the closeness of analytical values to "true values" (trueness) and among various repetitions (precision), the term traceability implies a link of data obtained to established references through an unbroken chain of comparisons all with stated uncertainties. These misunderstandings, possibly occurring among the analytical community, may have consequences on environmental data interpretation. Recent discussions in the field of environmental speciation analysis illustrated that accuracy and traceability issues are still not firmly established within the environmental chemistry community. This paper discusses this issue, taking methylmercury as a case study.

[1]  M. Stoeppler,et al.  Ultratrace analysis of mercury and methylmercury (MM) in rain water using cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry , 1987 .

[2]  F. Adams,et al.  Improving the reliability of speciation analysis of organometallic compounds , 2000 .

[3]  A. Diego,et al.  Potential interferences generated during mercury species determination using acid leaching, aqueous ethylation, cryogenic gas chromatography and atomic spectrometry detection techniques , 1999 .

[4]  R. Cela,et al.  Experimental design approach for the extraction of methylmercury from certified reference materials using microwave energy , 1999 .

[5]  F. Baldi,et al.  Methylmercury determination as volatile methylmercury hydride by purge and trap gas chromatography in line with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , 1992 .

[6]  S. Hill,et al.  High-performance liquid chromatography^ isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for speciation studies: an overview , 2000 .

[7]  B. Griepink.  The role of CRM's in measurement systems , 1990 .

[8]  J. Ariza,et al.  Stability of chemical species in environmental matrices , 2000 .

[9]  I. Drabaek,et al.  Evaluation of CP Sil 8 CB film thickness for the capillary GC determination of methyl mercury , 1992 .

[10]  G. Westöö,et al.  Determination of methylmercury compounds in foodstuffs. I. Methylmercury compounds in fish, identification and determination. , 1966, Acta chemica Scandinavica.

[11]  R. D. Evans,et al.  Determination of artifactual formation of monomethylmercury (CH3Hg+) in environmental samples using stable Hg2+ isotopes with ICP-MS detection: Calculation of contents applying species specific isotope addition , 1997 .

[12]  H. Hintelmann.  Comparison of different extraction techniques used for methylmercury analysis with respect to accidental formation of methylmercury during sample preparation , 1999 .

[13]  P. Quevauviller,et al.  Derivatization methods for the determination of organotin compounds in environmental samples , 2000 .

[14]  R. Falter.  Experimental study on the unintentional abiotic methylation of inorganic mercury during analysis: Part 1: Localisation of the compounds effecting the abiotic mercury methylation , 1999 .

[15]  J. A. Colman,et al.  Artifact formation of methyl mercury during aqueous distillation and alternative techniques for the extraction of methyl mercury from environmental samples , 1997 .

[16]  P. Quevauviller,et al.  Certification of total mercury and methyl-mercury in an estuarine sediment, CRM 580 , 1998 .

[17]  M. Horvat,et al.  Certification of total mercury and methylmercury concentrations in mussel homogenate (Mytilus edulis) reference material, IAEA-142 , 1997 .

[18]  H. Emteborg,et al.  Determination of methylmercury in sediments using supercritical fluid extraction and gas chromatography coupled with microwave-induced plasma atomic emission spectrometry , 1996 .

[19]  P. Massanisso,et al.  Comparison of twelve selected extraction methods for the determination of butyl- and phenyltin compounds in mussel samples , 2000 .

[20]  O. Donard,et al.  Rapid and Quantitative Microwave-assisted Recovery of Methylmercury From Standard Reference Sediments , 1997 .

[21]  C. Harrington.  The speciation of mercury and organomercury compounds by using high-performance liquid chromatography , 2000 .

[22]  C. Harrington,et al.  The speciation of mercury and organomercury compounds by high performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry , 1998 .

[23]  O. Donard,et al.  Hyphenated techniques applied to environmental speciation studies , 1992 .

[24]  P. Quevauviller.  Method performance evaluation for methylmercury determination in fish and sediment , 2000 .

[25]  R. Jenkins,et al.  The analysis of inorganic and methyl mercury by derivatisation methods; opportunities and difficulties , 1999 .

[26]  R. Falter.  Experimental study on the unintentional abiotic methylation of inorganic mercury during analysis: Part 2: Controlled laboratory experiments to elucidate the mechanism and critical discussion of the species specific isotope addition correction method , 1999 .

[27]  P. Quevauviller,et al.  Operationally defined extraction procedures for soil and sediment analysis I. Standardization , 1998 .

[28]  J. Bayona,et al.  Determination of methylmercury in fish and river water samples using in situ sodium tetraethylborate derivatization following by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry , 1995 .

[29]  M Horvat,et al.  An improved speciation method for mercury by GC/CVAFS after aqueous phase ethylation and room temperature precollection. , 1994, Talanta.

[30]  P. Quevauviller,et al.  A survey on stability of chemical species in solution during storage: the BCR experience , 1995 .

[31]  P. Quevauviller.  Evaluation of extraction recoveries for organometallic determinations in environmental matrices , 2000 .

[32]  R. D. Evans,et al.  Measurement of mercury methylation in sediments by using enriched stable mercury isotopes combined with methylmercury determination by gas chromatography–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry , 1995 .

[33]  R. Falter,et al.  Conclusion of the workshop on “sources of error in methylmercury determination during sample preparation, derivatisation and detection” , 1999 .

[34]  H. Emteborg,et al.  Sources of systematic errors in mercury speciation using Grignard reagents and capillary gas chromatography coupled to atomic spectrometry , 1999 .

[35]  Máire C Walsh.  Moving from official to traceable methods , 1999 .

[36]  A. Diego,et al.  Cryofocusing coupled to atomic absorption spectrometry for rapid and simple mercury speciation in environmental matrices , 1998 .

[37]  P. Quevauviller,et al.  Certified reference materials (CRMs 463 and 464) for the quality control of total and methyl mercury determination in tuna fish , 1996 .

[38]  S. Apte,et al.  Determination of Methylmercury in Natural Water Samples by Steam Distillation and Gas Chromatography−Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry , 1998 .