Mediating Power: Distance Learning Interfaces, Classroom Epistemology, and the Gaze

Abstract Distance learning's interfaces—from corresponding through the postal service to the televised talking head—have traditionally been designed from the top down, supporting banking models of learning or, in writing instruction, current-traditional rhetoric pedagogies. Due to temporal and spatial constraints, these interface designs often support (or encourage) one-way communication from the instructor to the student. Students mostly interact with the instructor by asking questions or submitting work, and they tend to have little correspondence with other peers. These methods clearly privilege the instructor's knowledge and evaluation. Furthermore, these interface designs empower the instructor to gaze upon the students and assess them—often not as a corporeal body but as a corpus of texts. Thus, each interface adopted for distance learning sets up a power dynamic in which the capability to share the roles of creating knowledge is juxtaposed with the instructor's capability to normalize the students and reify their own authority through their gaze. In this article we examine the traditional classroom interface through the correspondence course interface, the simulated classroom interface, and the synchronous video interface to raise questions about the infrastructures of distance learning and their implications for student learning.

[1]  James A. Berlin Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900 - 1985 , 1987 .

[2]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[3]  Karen L. Kopelson Dis/Integrating the Gay/Queer Binary: “Reconstructed Identity Politics” for a Performative Pedagogy , 2002, College English.

[4]  Woodrow Wilson,et al.  Walvoord, B. E. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education (2 nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. , 2010 .

[5]  Jung P. Shim,et al.  Trust in videoconferencing , 2006, CACM.

[6]  Charles Zaylor,et al.  Cyberspace: Creating a therapeutic environment for telehealth applications. , 2000 .

[7]  Nancy G. Barrón,et al.  Addressing Racial Diversity in a Writing Center: Stories and Lessons from Two Beginners , 2002, Writing Center Journal.

[8]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones. , 1994 .

[9]  B. Marlowe,et al.  Educational Foundations: An Anthology of Critical Readings , 2009 .

[10]  Joseph Petraglia,et al.  Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction , 1996 .

[11]  Susan Miller-Cochran,et al.  Determining effective distance learning designs through usability testing , 2006 .

[12]  Julia Elaine Romberger The ecology of a digital environment: Using ecofeminist theory to understand Microsoft Word's rhetorical design , 2004 .

[13]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[14]  Janet Bacon Transitions: Teaching writing in computer-supported and traditional classrooms , 1998 .

[15]  College Writing and Beyond , 2007 .

[16]  Eugene R. Kintgen,et al.  Perspectives on Literacy. , 1988 .

[17]  L. Mulvey,et al.  Looking at the Past from the Present: Rethinking Feminist Film Theory of the 1970s , 2004, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[18]  Lisa Nakamura Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet , 2007 .

[19]  M. Turk,et al.  Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments , 2005 .

[20]  Cheryl L. Johnson Participatory Rhetoric and the Teacher as Racial/Gendered Subject. , 1994 .

[21]  Julia Romberger,et al.  Designing efficiencies: The parallel narratives of distance education and composition studies , 2006 .

[22]  G. Olson,et al.  Social dynamics can be distorted in video-mediated communication , 2005 .

[23]  B. Walvoord,et al.  Assessment Clear and Simple: A Practical Guide for Institutions, Departments, and General Education Second Edition , 2004 .

[24]  E. Chow,et al.  EXPLORING CRITICAL FEMINIST PEDAGOGY: INFUSING DIALOGUE, PARTICIPATION, AND EXPERIENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING* , 2003 .

[25]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[26]  Ruigang Yang,et al.  Eye gaze correction with stereovision for video-teleconferencing , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[27]  K. Pew The body of Charlie Brown’s teacher: What instructors should know about constructing digital subjectivities , 2004 .

[28]  L. Mulvey Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema , 1975 .

[29]  David Bartholomae,et al.  Inventing the University , 2005 .

[30]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  What writers know : the language, process, and structure of written discourse , 1982 .

[31]  J. Tagg The learning paradigm college , 2003 .

[32]  K. Bruffee Collaborative Learning and the “Conversation of Mankind” , 1984, College English.

[33]  Andrew Morrison,et al.  Movement in the interface , 2005 .

[34]  Joyce Neff,et al.  Writing Across Distances and Disciplines: Research and Pedagogy in Distributed Learning , 2007 .