Relation of susceptibility-weighted imaging findings with histological grade in intracranial meningiomas

Aim: We aimed to investigate the relation of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) findings with histological grade in intracranial meningiomas. Materials and Methods: Histopathologically confirmed 58 intracranial meningioma patients (48 typical (low-grade meningioma), 10 atypical (high-grade meningioma)) who had undergone preoperative SWI between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor size, location, presence of peritumoral edema, WHO grade, low-grade meningioma subtypes and Ki-67 proliferation indexes were noted. SWI findings of intracranial meningiomas were categorized as either positive or negative based on presence/absence of intratumoral susceptibility signals (ITSSs). The origin of ITSSs in SWI-positive meningiomas was assessed with phase images and classified as calcification (SWI-C), vascular structure (SWI-V) or hemorrhage (SWI-H). Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, Fisher’s exact tests and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed for statistical assessment. Results: There was a significant association between SWI-positivity and low-grade in meningiomas (p = 0.010). A higher incidence of calcification was found in low-grade meningiomas (%60 in low-grade vs %10 in high-grade). Peritumoral edema was found to be associated with high grade in meningiomas (p = 0.032). Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly higher in high-grade meningiomas compared to low-grade. (p = 0.000). Conclusion: SWI combined with peritumoral edema may help to predict high grade in intracranial meningiomas.

[1]  H. Fine,et al.  Grading meningiomas utilizing multiparametric MRI with inclusion of susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping. , 2020, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[2]  D. Cao,et al.  Differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from meningioma using diffusion-weighted imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging , 2019, Neuroradiology.

[3]  D. Cao,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI combined with susceptibility-weighted MRI: added diagnostic value for four common lateral ventricular tumors , 2018, Acta radiologica.

[4]  A. Hale,et al.  Differentiating meningioma grade by imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging , 2018, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Buchert,et al.  Assessment of intracranial meningioma‐associated calcifications using susceptibility‐weighted MRI , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  M. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Spectrum of meningioma with special reference to prognostic utility of ER,PR and Ki67 expression , 2017, Journal of laboratory physicians.

[7]  Ji-zong Zhao,et al.  Prediction of High-Grade Pediatric Meningiomas: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Based on T1-Weighted, T2-Weighted, and Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Images. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[8]  A. Niemierko,et al.  Imaging and extent of surgical resection predict risk of meningioma recurrence better than WHO histopathological grade. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[9]  Yanhui Liu,et al.  The potential risk factors for atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: clinical series of 1,239 cases. , 2014, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[10]  Xinjian Lin,et al.  Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from high-grade glioma and brain metastases using susceptibility-weighted imaging , 2014, Brain and behavior.

[11]  P. Brotchie,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review , 2014, Insights into Imaging.

[12]  Tian Liu,et al.  Intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages: characterization with quantitative susceptibility mapping. , 2013, Radiology.

[13]  F. Yamasaki,et al.  Preoperative histological grading of meningiomas using apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T MRI. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[14]  S. Oya,et al.  The natural history of intracranial meningiomas. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  Chung-Ping Lo,et al.  Do aggressive imaging features correlate with advanced histopathological grade in meningiomas? , 2010, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[16]  G. Jahng,et al.  Added Value and Diagnostic Performance of Intratumoral Susceptibility Signals in the Differential Diagnosis of Solitary Enhancing Brain Lesions: Preliminary Study , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  E. Haacke,et al.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. , 2008, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  P. Black,et al.  Epidemiology of intracranial meningioma. , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) , 2004, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[20]  G. Fontanini,et al.  Meningioma-associated Brain Oedema: The Role of Angiogenic Factors and Pial Blood Supply , 2002, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[21]  Jitender Saini,et al.  Differentiation of grade II/III and grade IV glioma by combining “T1 contrast-enhanced brain perfusion imaging” and susceptibility-weighted quantitative imaging , 2017, Neuroradiology.

[22]  Y. Yoshimoto,et al.  Factors affecting peritumoral brain edema in meningioma: special histological subtypes with prominently extensive edema , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[23]  W. Couldwell,et al.  Incidental meningiomas. , 2011, Neurosurgical focus.

[24]  Z. Wu,et al.  Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 2 , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.