Widespread organ tolerance to Xist loss and X reactivation except under chronic stress in the gut

Significance There is growing interest in pharmacological reactivation of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) as a method of treating X-linked disorders. Indeed, unsilencing of the normal gene copies on the Xi could potentially restore expression of the missing protein for therapeutic benefit. Because general Xi reactivation would be expected to increase expression of some other X-linked genes, the in vivo consequences of any dosage imbalance must be investigated with care. Here, we use multiple mouse models to investigate systemic effects of Xi reactivation and observe a surprising tolerance to loss of Xist RNA and partial Xi reactivation. However, we also observe that Xist and XCI are protective to females during chronic stress in the gut. Long thought to be dispensable after establishing X chromosome inactivation (XCI), Xist RNA is now known to also maintain the inactive X (Xi). To what extent somatic X reactivation causes physiological abnormalities is an active area of inquiry. Here, we use multiple mouse models to investigate in vivo consequences. First, when Xist is deleted systemically in post-XCI embryonic cells using the Meox2-Cre driver, female pups exhibit no morbidity or mortality despite partial X reactivation. Second, when Xist is conditionally deleted in epithelial cells using Keratin14-Cre or in B cells using CD19-Cre, female mice have a normal life span without obvious illness. Third, when Xist is deleted in gut using Villin-Cre, female mice remain healthy despite significant X–autosome dosage imbalance. Finally, when the gut is acutely stressed by azoxymethane/dextran sulfate (AOM/DSS) exposure, both Xist-deleted and wild-type mice develop gastrointestinal tumors. Intriguingly, however, under prolonged stress, mutant mice develop larger tumors and have a higher tumor burden. The effect is female specific. Altogether, these observations reveal a surprising systemic tolerance to Xist loss but importantly reveal that Xist and XCI are protective to females during chronic stress.

[1]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Xist RNA antagonizes the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler BRG1 on the inactive X chromosome , 2018, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[2]  E. Foss,et al.  Perturbed maintenance of transcriptional repression on the inactive X-chromosome in the mouse brain after Xist deletion , 2018, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[3]  R. J. Kelleher,et al.  Tsix–Mecp2 female mouse model for Rett syndrome reveals that low-level MECP2 expression extends life and improves neuromotor function , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R. J. Kelleher,et al.  A mixed modality approach towards Xi reactivation for Rett syndrome and other X-linked disorders , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  The X chromosome in space , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  K. Hall Faculty Opinions recommendation of Chromosomes. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation. , 2017 .

[7]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Screen for reactivation of MeCP2 on the inactive X chromosome identifies the BMP/TGF-β superfamily as a regulator of XIST expression , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Female mice lacking Xist RNA show partial dosage compensation and survive to term , 2016, Genes & development.

[9]  A. Nebreda,et al.  Gene Dosage Imbalance Contributes to Chromosomal Instability-Induced Tumorigenesis. , 2016, Developmental cell.

[10]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  The Xist RNA-PRC2 complex at 20-nm resolution reveals a low Xist stoichiometry and suggests a hit-and-run mechanism in mouse cells , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Chromosomes. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation. , 2015, Science.

[12]  Paul Theodor Pyl,et al.  HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data , 2014, bioRxiv.

[13]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Genetic and pharmacological reactivation of the mammalian inactive X chromosome , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  N. Barker Adult intestinal stem cells: critical drivers of epithelial homeostasis and regeneration , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Tsix RNA and the germline factor, PRDM14, link X reactivation and stem cell reprogramming. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[16]  Eda Yildirim,et al.  Xist RNA Is a Potent Suppressor of Hematologic Cancer in Mice , 2013, Cell.

[17]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Primary mouse small intestinal epithelial cell cultures. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[18]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions , 2013, Genome Biology.

[19]  C. Disteche Dosage compensation of the sex chromosomes. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[20]  M. Sur,et al.  Molecular signatures of human induced pluripotent stem cells highlight sex differences and cancer genes. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[21]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[22]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Two-Step Imprinted X Inactivation: Repeat versus Genic Silencing in the Mouse , 2010, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[23]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[24]  Terry Magnuson,et al.  Evidence of Xist RNA-independent initiation of mouse imprinted X-chromosome inactivation , 2009, Nature.

[25]  J. Starmer,et al.  A new model for random X chromosome inactivation , 2009, Development.

[26]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Polycomb Proteins Targeted by a Short Repeat RNA to the Mouse X Chromosome , 2008, Science.

[27]  Angelika Amon,et al.  Aneuploidy: Cells Losing Their Balance , 2008, Genetics.

[28]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  Transcription factor TEAD4 specifies the trophectoderm lineage at the beginning of mammalian development , 2007, Development.

[29]  Markus F Neurath,et al.  An inducible mouse model of colon carcinogenesis for the analysis of sporadic and inflammation-driven tumor progression , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[30]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Perinucleolar Targeting of the Inactive X during S Phase: Evidence for a Role in the Maintenance of Silencing , 2007, Cell.

[31]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Hematopoietic Precursor Cells Transiently Reestablish Permissiveness for XInactivation , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[32]  Anton Wutz,et al.  A Chromosomal Memory Triggered by Xist Regulates Histone Methylation in X Inactivation , 2004, PLoS biology.

[33]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  Reactivation of the Paternal X Chromosome in Early Mouse Embryos , 2004, Science.

[34]  R. Carsetti Characterization of B-cell maturation in the peripheral immune system. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[35]  Michael C. Ostrowski,et al.  Extra-embryonic function of Rb is essential for embryonic development and viability , 2003, Nature.

[36]  D. Gumucio,et al.  cis Elements of the Villin Gene Control Expression in Restricted Domains of the Vertical (Crypt) and Horizontal (Duodenum, Cecum) Axes of the Intestine* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  T. Magnuson,et al.  Imprinted X inactivation maintained by a mouse Polycomb group gene , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[38]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Synergism of Xist Rna, DNA Methylation, and Histone Hypoacetylation in Maintaining X Chromosome Inactivation , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  A. McMahon,et al.  Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. , 2000, Development.

[40]  F. Grosveld,et al.  An intrinsic but cell-nonautonomous defect in GATA-1-overexpressing mouse erythroid cells , 2000, Nature.

[41]  Philippe Soriano,et al.  Epiblast‐restricted Cre expression in MORE mice: A tool to distinguish embryonic vs. extra‐embryonic gene function , 2000, Genesis.

[42]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Conditional deletion of Xist disrupts histone macroH2A localization but not maintenance of X inactivation , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[43]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  B lymphocyte-specific, Cre-mediated mutagenesis in mice. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis. , 1997, Genes & development.

[45]  J. Mcneil,et al.  XIST RNA paints the inactive X chromosome at interphase: evidence for a novel RNA involved in nuclear/chromosome structure , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  S. Rastan,et al.  Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation , 1996, Nature.

[47]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  The human X-inactivation centre is not required for maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation , 1994, Nature.

[48]  Dominic P. Norris,et al.  The product of the mouse Xist gene is a 15 kb inactive X-specific transcript containing no conserved ORF and located in the nucleus , 1992, Cell.

[49]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  The human XIST gene: Analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus , 1992, Cell.

[50]  M. Monk,et al.  Sequential X chromosome inactivation coupled with cellular differentiation in early mouse embryos , 1979, Nature.