Distribution factors for reactive power in the presence of bilateral transactions

The twin factors of limited investment in electric transmission systems and the over exploitation of electrical resources results in an increase in the need for reactive power to support system voltage profile and to supply loads. It is reasonable to expect that generators and compensators, heavily involved in reactive support on a voluntary basis, will be remunerated for their service by market transactions. This remuneration will depend on the network topology, i.e. of buyers, sellers and reactive injection locations, on the active power exchanged and the reactive power required by loads. All these aspects are taken into account in developing a methodology based on circuit considerations. Using this approach, at a given system operating point characterised by a predefined set of transactions, reactive responsibilities can be formulated as the sum of two terms: one strictly related to transactions and the other dependent on electric network parameters. Test results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed methodology in sharing reactive power responsibilities in a fair way among market participants.

[1]  A. El-Keib,et al.  Calculating short-run marginal costs of active and reactive power production , 1997 .

[2]  M. L. Baughman,et al.  Real-time pricing of reactive power: theory and case study results , 1991, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  Young-Hyun Moon,et al.  Cost evaluation for capacitive reactive power under the deregulation environment , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[4]  A. David,et al.  Wheeling rates of reactive power flow under marginal cost pricing , 1994 .

[5]  N. H. Dandachi,et al.  OPF for reactive pricing studies on the NGC system , 1995 .

[6]  G. Strbac,et al.  A method for simulation and analysis of reactive power market , 1999 .

[7]  J. Barquin Gil,et al.  Reactive power pricing: a conceptual framework for remuneration and charging procedures , 2000 .

[8]  R.J. Thomas,et al.  Kirchhoff vs. competitive electricity markets: a few examples , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[9]  F. Galiana,et al.  Power systems restructuring : engineering and economics , 1998 .

[10]  Shangyou Hao,et al.  Reactive power pricing and management , 1997 .

[11]  K. Bhattacharya,et al.  Reactive Power as an Ancillary Service , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[12]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  Power Systems Restructuring , 1998 .

[13]  Fushuan Wen,et al.  A study of reactive power marginal price in electricity market , 2001 .

[14]  J. W. Lamont,et al.  Cost analysis of reactive power support , 1999 .

[15]  Bala Venkatesh,et al.  A new optimal reactive power scheduling method for loss minimization and voltage stability margin maximization using successive multi-objective fuzzy LP technique , 2000 .

[16]  Mesut Baran,et al.  A transaction assessment method for allocation of transmission services , 1999 .