Limitations of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury.

OBJECTIVE Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) following trauma carry risk for morbidity and mortality. Since patients with BCVI are often asymptomatic at presentation and neurological sequelae often occur within 72 hours, timely diagnosis is essential. Multidetector CT angiography (CTA) has been shown to be a noninvasive, cost-effective, reliable means of screening; however, the false-positive rate of CTA in diagnosing patients with BCVI represents a key drawback. Therefore, the authors assessed the role of DSA in the screening of BCVI when utilizing CTA as the initial screening modality. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients who experienced BCVI between 2013 and 2015 at 2 Level I trauma centers. All patients underwent CTA screening for BCVI according to the updated Denver Screening Criteria. Patients who were diagnosed with BCVI on CTA underwent confirmatory digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Patient demographics, screening indication, BCVI grade on CTA and DSA, and laboratory values were collected. Comparison of false-positive rates stratified by BCVI grade on CTA was performed using the chi-square test. RESULTS A total of 140 patients (64% males, mean age 50 years) with 156 cerebrovascular blunt injuries to the carotid and/or vertebral arteries were identified. After comparison with DSA findings, CTA findings were incorrect in 61.5% of vessels studied, and the overall CTA false-positive rates were 47.4% of vessels studied and 47.9% of patients screened. The positive predictive value (PPV) for CTA was higher among worse BCVI subtypes on initial imaging (PPV 76% and 97%, for BCVI Grades II and IV, respectively) compared with Grade I injuries (PPV 30%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In the current series, multidetector CTA as a screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury had a high-false positive rate, especially in patients with Grade I BCVI. Given a false-positive rate of 47.9% with an estimated average of 132 patients per year screening positive for BCVI with CTA, approximately 63 patients per year would potentially be treated unnecessarily with antithrombotic therapy at a busy United States Level I trauma center. The authors' data support the use of DSA after positive findings on CTA in patients with suspected BCVI. DSA as an adjunctive test in patients with positive CTA findings allows for increased diagnostic accuracy in correctly diagnosing BCVI while minimizing risk from unnecessary antithrombotic therapy in polytrauma patients.

[1]  S. Eastham Blunt cerebrovascular injuries in trauma. , 2016, International journal of surgery.

[2]  Timothy C Fabian,et al.  A safe and effective management strategy for blunt cerebrovascular injury: Avoiding unnecessary anticoagulation and eliminating stroke , 2016, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[3]  Ben L Zarzaur,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography: More slices finally cut it , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[4]  E. Irwin,et al.  Therapeutic anticoagulation can be safely accomplished in selected patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage , 2012, World Journal of Emergency Surgery.

[5]  B. Robinson,et al.  Early treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injury with concomitant hemorrhagic neurologic injury is safe and effective , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[6]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: Redefining screening criteria in the era of noninvasive diagnosis , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[7]  Ben L Zarzaur,et al.  Improving the screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: the appropriate role for computed tomography angiography. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening With 32-Channel Multidetector Computed Tomography: More Slices Still Don't Cut It , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[9]  M. Schreiber,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Wilkins,et al.  Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  D. Magee,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography versus conventional angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury in trauma patients. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  E. Moore,et al.  Treatment for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: equivalence of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[13]  C. Sliker,et al.  Diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injuries with 16-MDCT: accuracy of whole-body MDCT compared with neck MDCT angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  T. Fabian,et al.  Prospective Screening for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities and Outcomes , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[15]  E. Moore,et al.  Treatment-Related Outcomes From Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Importance of Routine Follow-Up Arteriography , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[16]  L. Greenfield,et al.  Antiplatelet therapy: an alternative to heparin for blunt carotid injury. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  R. Bynoe,et al.  Liberalized screening for blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries is justified. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: diagnosis and treatment. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  S. Kurek,et al.  Traumatic Carotid Artery Dissection: A Significant Incidental Finding , 2000, The American surgeon.

[20]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries , 2021, DeckerMed Neurology.

[22]  R. Reed,et al.  Blunt vascular injuries of the head and neck: is heparinization necessary? , 1998, The Journal of trauma.

[23]  E. Moore,et al.  The unrecognized epidemic of blunt carotid arterial injuries: early diagnosis improves neurologic outcome. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[24]  S. Shackford,et al.  Blunt carotid artery dissection: incidence, associated injuries, screening, and treatment. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[25]  T. Scalea,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? , 2009, The Journal of trauma.