Consumer preferences for the marketing of ethically labelled coffee

Purpose – This study aims to assesses the relative importance that Belgian consumers attach to different characteristics and marketing practices of ethically labelled coffee, i.e. type of ethical issue, label issuer, amount of information provided, distribution and promotion strategy and branding.Design/methodology/approach – Buying behaviour is studied by means of a web‐based survey in a sample of 750 Belgian consumers, using conjoint analysis.Findings – Consumers attach greatest importance to the distribution strategy of ethically labelled coffee, followed by the type of ethical label, and the issuer of the label. Ethically labelled coffee should be available in ordinary supermarkets and be presented along with non‐ethical coffee brands. Fair trade labelled coffee is by far the most preferred over eco‐ and bio‐labels. European government labels, or labels issued by non‐governmental organizations, are preferred over national (Belgian) government endorsed labels. Consumers prefer extra information on the ...

[1]  R. Johnston,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences for Ecolabeled Seafood: The Influence of Species, Certifier, and Household Attributes , 1999 .

[2]  James A. Roberts.  Will the real socially responsible consumer please step forward , 1996 .

[3]  R. Geers,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Animal Welfare: Transparency in the Food Product Quality Chain , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[4]  A. Tallontire,et al.  Ethical consumers and ethical trade: a review of currentliterature (NRI Policy Series 12) , 2001 .

[5]  Marylyn Carrigan,et al.  The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? , 2001 .

[6]  Catherine A. Cole,et al.  The Effects of Length, Content, and Repetition on Television Commercial Effectiveness , 1993 .

[7]  P. Green,et al.  Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects , 2001 .

[8]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[9]  Julie A. Caswell,et al.  Toward a More Comprehensive Theory of Food Labels , 1992 .

[10]  G. Grankvist,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Labelling on Consumer Preference: Negative vs. Positive Labels , 2004 .

[11]  Byung-Kwan Lee,et al.  The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line environment , 2004 .

[12]  Mario F. Teisl,et al.  Ecocertification: Why It May Not Be a “Field of Dreams” , 1999 .

[13]  C. Byrd-Bredbenner,et al.  Consumer understanding of US and EU nutrition labels , 2000 .

[14]  M. King,et al.  Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing , 2000 .

[15]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Structural Reliability and Stability of Nonmetric Conjoint Analysis , 1982 .

[16]  A. Sikula,et al.  Are women more ethical than men? , 1994 .

[17]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Information Overload and the Nonrobustness of Linear Models: A Comment on Keller and Staelin , 1989 .

[18]  R. Mittelhammer,et al.  Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco-labeled Apples? , 2002 .

[19]  Marylyn Carrigan,et al.  Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude—behaviour gap , 2000 .

[20]  Amy Lynn Salzhauer.  Obstacles and Opportunities for a Consumer Ecolabel , 1991 .

[21]  W. Janssens,et al.  Kennis, houding en gedrag van de Belgen t.a.v. fair trade producten: conclusies uit vier focusgroepgesprekken , 2003 .

[22]  Julie A. Caswell,et al.  Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products , 1996 .

[23]  J. Tsalikis,et al.  Ethical beliefs' differences of males and females , 1990 .

[24]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness , 1987 .

[25]  J. Caswell.  Current Information Levels on Food Labels , 1992 .

[26]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair‐Trade Coffee , 2005 .

[27]  B. Wansink.  How Do Front and Back Package Labels Influence Beliefs About Health Claims? , 2003 .

[28]  Jehoshua Eliashberg,et al.  New Product Announcement Signals and Incumbent Reactions , 1995 .

[29]  H. Nilsson.  What are the possible influences affecting the future environmental agricultural policy in the European Union? An investigation into the main factors , 2004 .

[30]  O. Ferrell,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework , 2004 .

[31]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Assessing Biases in Measuring Decision Effectiveness and Information Overload , 1989 .

[32]  J. Douglas Carroll,et al.  Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part I, Conjoint Analysis , 1995 .

[33]  Philip A. Titus,et al.  Reflections on Consumer Sophistication and Its Impact on Ethical Business Practice , 1996 .

[34]  Ian Clarke,et al.  Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: an exploratory study , 1999 .

[35]  S. Zadek,et al.  Social Labels: Tools for Ethical Trade , 1998 .

[36]  James A. Roberts.  Profiling Levels of Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior: A Cluster Analytic Approach and Its Implications for Marketing , 1995 .

[37]  I. Maignan.  Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument: concepts, evidence and research directions , 2001 .

[38]  The Importance of Labelling Examined in Food Marketing , 1994 .

[39]  Åke Thidell,et al.  The use of eco-labeling like initiatives on food products to promote quality assurance—is there enough credibility? , 2004 .

[40]  P. Ulrich,et al.  Facing Public Interest. The Ethical Challenge to Business Policy and Corporate Communications , 1995 .

[41]  M. Dickson.  Utility of No Sweat Labels for Apparel Consumers: Profiling Label Users and Predicting Their Purchases , 2001 .

[42]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Incorporating Group-Level Similarity Judgments in Conjoint Analysis , 1978 .

[43]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[44]  P. Bloom,et al.  A Proposed Model of the Use of Package Claims and Nutrition Labels , 1997 .

[45]  J. Carroll,et al.  Guest Editorial: Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part I, Conjoint Analysis , 1995 .