A theory of knowledge construction systems

This paper considers the problem of knowledge integration, and proposes a theory of knowledge construction systems, which consists of three fundamental parts: a knowledge construction system, a structure–agency–action paradigm, and evolutionary-constructive objectivism. The first part is a model of collecting and synthesizing knowledge, the second relates to necessary abilities of actors when collecting knowledge in individual domains, and the third comprises a set of principles to justify collected and synthesized knowledge. The paper starts with a brief introduction of our basic systems approach, called ‘informed systems thinking’, followed by a summary of our proposal: a theory of knowledge construction systems. The paper then explains its three fundamental parts, with a special emphasis on the types of knowledge integration, and finally gives a detailed explanation of the theory with an example. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Yoshiteru Nakamori,et al.  Systems methodology and mathematical models for knowledge management , 2003 .

[2]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Towards a System of Systems Methodologies , 1984 .

[3]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[4]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  Decision support versus knowledge creation support , 2006 .

[5]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[6]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  The nonsense of knowledge management , 2002, Inf. Res..

[7]  C. Churchman.  Operations Research as a Profession , 1970 .

[8]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  Systems Approach to Knowledge Synthesis , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Syst. Sci..

[9]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[10]  Zhichang Zhu,et al.  Dealing with a Differentiated Whole: The Philosophy of the WSR Approach , 2000 .

[11]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[12]  Matjaž Mulej,et al.  Systems theory: a worldview and/or a methodology aimed at requisite holism/realism of humans' thinking, decisions and action , 2007 .

[13]  K. Boulding.  General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[14]  J. Child.  Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect , 1997 .

[15]  Robert Chia,et al.  Strategy-as-practice: reflections on the research agenda , 2004, European Management Review.

[16]  Zhichang Zhu.  Conscious Mind, Forgetting Mind: Two Approaches in Multimethodology , 1998 .

[17]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  Systems Thinking for the 21st Century , 2000 .

[18]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practices-in-Use , 2004 .

[19]  Samuel P. Huntington,et al.  The Clash of Civilization , 1993 .

[20]  Yoshiteru Nakamori,et al.  A knowledge integration methodology for designing a knowledge base of technology development in traditional craft industry , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[21]  W. Sewell.  A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[23]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Towards synergy in multiperspective management: An American–Chinese case , 2000 .

[24]  Gerard Piel,et al.  The Modernizing Imperative: Tradition and Change , 1993 .

[25]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[26]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[27]  Zhichang Zhu,et al.  The Practice of Multimodal Approaches, the Challenge of Cross-Cultural Communication, and the Search for Responses , 1999 .

[28]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .