Comparative Visual Analysis of Lagrangian Transport in CFD Ensembles

Sets of simulation runs based on parameter and model variation, so-called ensembles, are increasingly used to model physical behaviors whose parameter space is too large or complex to be explored automatically. Visualization plays a key role in conveying important properties in ensembles, such as the degree to which members of the ensemble agree or disagree in their behavior. For ensembles of time-varying vector fields, there are numerous challenges for providing an expressive comparative visualization, among which is the requirement to relate the effect of individual flow divergence to joint transport characteristics of the ensemble. Yet, techniques developed for scalar ensembles are of little use in this context, as the notion of transport induced by a vector field cannot be modeled using such tools. We develop a Lagrangian framework for the comparison of flow fields in an ensemble. Our techniques evaluate individual and joint transport variance and introduce a classification space that facilitates incorporation of these properties into a common ensemble visualization. Variances of Lagrangian neighborhoods are computed using pathline integration and Principal Components Analysis. This allows for an inclusion of uncertainty measurements into the visualization and analysis approach. Our results demonstrate the usefulness and expressiveness of the presented method on several practical examples.

[1]  V. Yohai,et al.  Robust Statistics: Theory and Methods , 2006 .

[2]  Pat Hanrahan,et al.  Volume Rendering , 2020, Definitions.

[3]  Daniel Weiskopf,et al.  Flow Radar Glyphs—Static Visualization of Unsteady Flow with Uncertainty , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  Valerio Pascucci,et al.  Ensemble-Vis: A Framework for the Statistical Visualization of Ensemble Data , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[5]  Holger Theisel,et al.  Uncertain topology of 3D vector fields , 2011, 2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium.

[6]  Andrew T. Wilson,et al.  Toward visual analysis of ensemble data sets , 2009, UltraVis '09.

[7]  Joe Michael Kniss,et al.  Multidimensional Transfer Functions for Interactive Volume Rendering , 2002, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[8]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Approaches to uncertainty visualization , 1996, The Visual Computer.

[9]  Kenneth I. Joy,et al.  Function Field Analysis for the Visualization of Flow Similarity in Time-Varying Vector Fields , 2012, ISVC.

[10]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Strategies for the visualization of multiple 2D vector fields , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[11]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Probabilistic Local Features in Uncertain Vector Fields with Spatial Correlation , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[12]  Harald Obermaier,et al.  Volume Deformations in Grid‐Less Flow Simulations , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[13]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Glyphs for Visualizing Uncertainty in Vector Fields , 1996, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[14]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  UFLOW: visualizing uncertainty in fluid flow , 1996, Proceedings of Seventh Annual IEEE Visualization '96.

[15]  Brian Cabral,et al.  Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[16]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  A sketch-based interface for classifying and visualizing vector fields , 2010, 2010 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[17]  Ralf P. Botchen,et al.  INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN FLOW FIELDS USING TEXTURE-BASED TECHNIQUES , .

[18]  Hans Hagen,et al.  Efficient Computation and Visualization of Coherent Structures in Fluid Flow Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[19]  Heidrun Schumann,et al.  The Visualization of Uncertain Data: Methods and Problems , 2006, SimVis.

[20]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Localized Finite-time Lyapunov Exponent for Unsteady Flow Analysis , 2009, VMV.

[21]  D. Schneider,et al.  A Variance Based FTLE-Like Method for Unsteady Uncertain Vector Fields , 2012 .

[22]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Uncertain 2D Vector Field Topology , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[23]  Andrew Mercer,et al.  Noodles: A Tool for Visualization of Numerical Weather Model Ensemble Uncertainty , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  Nahum D. Gershon Visualization of an Imperfect World , 1998, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[25]  Wolfgang Berger,et al.  Comparative Visual Analysis of 2D Function Ensembles , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[26]  Stefan Bruckner,et al.  Result-Driven Exploration of Simulation Parameter Spaces for Visual Effects Design , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[28]  Gordon L. Kindlmann,et al.  Semi-Automatic Generation of Transfer Functions for Direct Volume Rendering , 1998, VVS.

[29]  Ken Brodlie,et al.  Accuracy in 3D Particle Tracing , 1997, VisMath.

[30]  Vivek Verma,et al.  Comparative flow visualization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[31]  David C. Banks,et al.  Clustered Ensemble Averaging: A Technique for Visualizing Qualitative Features of , 2006 .

[32]  Andrew T. Wilson,et al.  Visualization of uncertainty and ensemble data: Exploration of climate modeling and weather forecast data with integrated ViSUS-CDAT systems , 2009 .

[33]  G. Haller Distinguished material surfaces and coherent structures in three-dimensional fluid flows , 2001 .

[34]  Chris R. Johnson,et al.  A Next Step: Visualizing Errors and Uncertainty , 2003, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[35]  Hans Hagen,et al.  Visualization of Coherent Structures in Transient 2D Flows , 2009, Topology-Based Methods in Visualization II.