Gain changes in the accommodative convergence cross‐link

The output of the accommodative vergence cross‐link, the AC/A ratio, was measured before and after subjects viewed through a telestereoscope which increased their interocular separation (pd) approximately fourfold. The initial paradigm was designed to force an increase in the AC/A ratio in that subjects alternately fixated targets set at differing distances. In this paradigm, the varying vergence demands could not be met by a constant increase in phasic or tonic vergence responses. In a second paradigm, only one target was viewed at a fixed position from the eye. Now the constant vergence demand could be met by a set increase in phasic and/or tonic vergence. A significant increase in the AC/A ratio was found in the two‐target study but not in the single‐target study. Increases in the accommodative vergence gain did show considerable individual differences. Tonic vergence changes were interpolated from the data. This parameter increased significantly in both cases but more so when two targets were alternately fixated. This finding is consistent with current near triad models which predict that accommodative convergence input acts along with disparity vergence input to increase tonic levels of convergence. When AC/A ratios were calculated using clinical measures of the phoria at 6 and 0.4 m, increases were found in the two‐target study and to a lesser degree in the single‐target study. This clinical method of AC/A measure appears to have been confounded by changes in tonic vergence.

[1]  M. Alpern,et al.  Vergence and accommodation. III. Proposed definitions of the AC/A ratios. , 1959, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  M W Morgan,et al.  Accommodation and vergence. , 1968, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  M. Alpern,et al.  Vergence and accommodation. V. Pupil size changes associated with changes in accommodative vergence. , 1961, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  E F FINCHAM,et al.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Changes in the Coupling between Accommodation and Vergence Eye Movements Induced in Human Subjects by Altering the Effective Interocular Separation , 1985, Perception.

[6]  M. C. Flom On the relationship between accommodation and accommodative convergence. III. Effects of orthoptics. , 1960, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  On the relationship between accommodation and accommodative convergence. II. Stability. , 1960, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[8]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  Relation between Distance Heterophoria and Tonic Vergence , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[9]  C M Schor,et al.  Fatigue of accommodation and vergence modifies their mutual interactions. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  F A Miles,et al.  Optically induced changes in the couplings between vergence and accommodation , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Schor,et al.  A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: simulations of step and frequency responses. , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  Miles Fa,et al.  Adaptive regulation in the vergence and accommodation control systems. , 1985 .

[13]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Adaptation to Optically-Increased Interocular Separation under Naturalistic Viewing Conditions , 1990, Perception.

[14]  G K Hung Adaptation model of accommodation and vergence , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  S M Ebenholtz,et al.  Does perceptual adaptation to telestereoscopically enhanced depth depend on the recalibration of binocular disparity? , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive , 1986, Vision Research.

[17]  M. W. Morgan The ciliary body in accommodation and accommodative-convergence. , 1954, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity , 1979, Vision Research.