How Do Emerging Technologies Conquer the World? An Exploration of Patterns of Diffusion and Network Formation

Grasping the fruits of “emerging technologies” is an objective of many government priority programs in a knowledge-based and globalizing economy. We use the publication records (in the Science Citation Index) of two emerging technologies to study the mechanisms of diffusion in the case of two innovation trajectories: small interference RNA (siRNA) and nano-crystalline solar cells (NCSC). Methods for analyzing and visualizing geographical and cognitive diffusion are specified as indicators of different dynamics. Geographical diffusion is illustrated with overlays to Google Maps; cognitive diffusion is mapped using an overlay to a map based on the ISI Subject Categories. The evolving geographical networks show both preferential attachment and small-world characteristics. The strength of preferential attachment decreases over time, while the network evolves into an oligopolistic control structure with small-world characteristics. The transferability of the research technology in cognitive terms—that is, the transition from “mode-1” to “mode-2” research—is suggested as the crucial difference in explaining the different rates of diffusion between siRNA and NCSC.

[1]  Gary Hodes,et al.  Nanocrystalline photoelectrochemical cells : a new concept in photovoltaic cells , 1992 .

[2]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[3]  Terry Shinn,et al.  New sources of radical innovation: research-technologies, transversality and distributed learning in a post-industrial order , 2005 .

[4]  Joao Antonio Pereira,et al.  Linked: The new science of networks , 2002 .

[5]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[6]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[7]  B. Lundvall.  National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[8]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[9]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system , 2004, Scientometrics.

[10]  C. R. Rao,et al.  Diversity: its measurement, decomposition, apportionment and analysis , 1982 .

[11]  László Papp,et al.  Application of the quadratic entropy indices for diversity studies of drosophilid assemblages , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[12]  E. Holtzman,et al.  The Cancer Mission: Social Contexts of Biomedical Research , 1980 .

[13]  N. Rosenberg.  The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices , 1969, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[14]  J. S. Katz,et al.  Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation , 2000 .

[15]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  A Methodology for Integrating Network Theory and Topic Modeling and its Application to Innovation Diffusion , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[16]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[17]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[18]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies , 1994 .

[19]  B. Carlsson.  Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[20]  S. Iijima.  Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon , 1991, Nature.

[21]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[22]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Derek deS. Price,et al.  The Science/Technology Relationship, the Craft of Experimental Science, and Policy for the Improvement of High Technology Innovation : Research Policy , 1987 .

[24]  A. Stirling.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  L. Leydesdorff.  The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated , 2006 .

[26]  David H. Guston,et al.  Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society , 2010 .

[27]  Derek J. de Solla Price,et al.  The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation☆ , 1993 .

[28]  Marco Bellandi,et al.  From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research , 2003 .

[29]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Can epidemic models describe the diffusion of topics across disciplines? , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[30]  Wolfgang Krohn,et al.  Geplante Forschung : vergleichende Studien über den Einfluß politischer Programme auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung , 1979 .

[31]  K. Frenken.  Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory , 2006 .

[32]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Scaling trajectories in civil aircraft (1913–1997) , 2000, 1001.1312.

[33]  Peter Weingart,et al.  The Political Direction of Scientific Development , 1977 .

[34]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[36]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  A. Fire,et al.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1998, Nature.

[38]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level , 2009, 0912.3101.

[39]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[40]  M. Narasimham,et al.  The economics of knowledge , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[41]  Z. Neda,et al.  Measuring preferential attachment in evolving networks , 2001, cond-mat/0104131.

[42]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[43]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[44]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[45]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[46]  Duncan J. Watts.  The accidental influentials , 2011 .

[47]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Proliferation dynamics in new sciences , 2010 .

[48]  A. Bonaccorsi.  Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science , 2008 .

[49]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Information, variety and entropy in technoeconomic development☆ , 1988 .

[50]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[51]  Morris Teubal,et al.  On User Needs and Need Determination: Aspects of the Theory of Technological Innovation , 1979 .

[52]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[53]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[54]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[55]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[56]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[57]  J. Milroy,et al.  Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation , 1985, Journal of Linguistics.

[58]  Jarno Hoekman,et al.  Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[59]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Identifying creative research accomplishments: Methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics , 2007, Scientometrics.

[60]  J. H. Fujimura.  The Molecular Biological Bandwagon in Cancer Research: Where Social Worlds Meet , 1988 .

[61]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[62]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[63]  C. Ricotta,et al.  Towards a unifying approach to diversity measures: bridging the gap between the Shannon entropy and Rao's quadratic index. , 2006, Theoretical population biology.

[64]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[65]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .