Spillover Effects of Foreclosures on Neighborhood Property Values

Previous studies have shown that foreclosure often results in vandalism, disinvestment and other negative spillover effects in the neighborhood. This paper extends these views into a formal theoretical model through pricing based on comparables. We project that the spillover effect of a foreclosure on neighborhood property values depends on two factors: the discount of foreclosure sale and the weight placed on the foreclosed property as a comparable in the valuation. The former is related to housing cycle and the latter varies by time of foreclosure and its distance from the subject property. Empirical results based on a 2006 sample show that this effect is significant within a radius of 0.9 km (roughly 10 blocks) and within 5 years from its liquidation. The most severe impact is an 8.7% discount on neighborhood property values, which gradually drops to anywhere between −1.2 to −1.7% for foreclosures liquidated within the past 5 years. These spillover effects vary slightly when the sample selection bias is taken into account. Based on an alternative sample of purchase transactions in 2003, the estimated spillover effects in booming years are reduced by half, confirming on the important role played by housing cycles.

[1]  Kerry D. Vandell Optimal Comparable Selection and Weighting in Real Property Valuation , 1991 .

[2]  Robert A. Simons,et al.  The Value Impact of New Residential Construction and Neighborhood Disinvestment on Residential Sales Price , 1998 .

[3]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Fred A. Forgey,et al.  Effect of Foreclosure Status on Residential Selling Price , 2009 .

[5]  Dan Immergluck,et al.  The external costs of foreclosure: The impact of single‐family mortgage foreclosures on property values , 2006 .

[6]  Dan Immergluck,et al.  Measuring the Effect of Subprime Lending on Neighborhood Foreclosures , 2005 .

[7]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[8]  V. Smith Experiments with a Decentralized Mechanism for Public Good Decisions , 1980 .

[9]  Marvin L. Wolverton,et al.  The Relationship between Foreclosure Status and Apartment Price , 2009 .

[10]  Gurupdesh Pandher,et al.  Risk and Return in the U.S. Housing Market: A Cross-Sectional Asset-Pricing Approach , 2006 .

[11]  Kerry D. Vandell,et al.  Illiquidity and Pricing Biases in the Real Estate Market , 2007 .

[12]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations , 1980 .

[13]  Michael LaCour-Little The Evolving Role of Technology in Mortgage Finance , 1999 .

[14]  J. L. Goodman A Housing Market Matching Model of the Seasonality in Geographic Mobility , 1993 .

[15]  Mortgage Terminations, Heterogeneity and the Exercise of Mortgage Options , 1999 .

[16]  Lihong Yang,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Mortgage Terminations by Refinance, Sale and Default , 2003 .

[17]  Kerry D. Vandell How Ruthless Is Mortgage Default? A Review and Synthesis of the Evidence , 2001 .

[18]  S. Rosen Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Vern Baxter,et al.  Residential mortgage foreclosure and neighborhood change , 2000 .