Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.

Ecosystem services are the benefits people obtain from ecosystems, and ecosystem services trade-offs have been widely applied to the development of land-use policy. Although previous studies have focused on trade-offs of ecosystem services, a scenario approach has been seldom used. The scenario approach can reveal the changes of ecosystem services for different land-use patterns in the future, and is of great significance for land-use decisions and ecosystem management. Based on the actual situation of deteriorating water quality and dwindling water supply in the Erhai Lake Basin of southwest China, this study put forward to convert paddy land to dry land (PLDL) in the basin, and simulated its potential impact on ecosystem services. Taking environmental pollution, social impact, economic benefit and residential participation into consideration, four scenarios of PLDL were designed. Then, four ecosystem services (water purification, water yield, soil conservation and rice production) were calculated for each scenario. The optimal scenario of PLDL in the Erhai Lake Basin was identified by trade-offs of the four ecosystem services. The results showed that the total nitrogen export could be reduced by 42.07% and water yield can be increased by 5.61% after converting 100% of paddy lands to dry land, thereby greatly improving the water quality and increasing the water yield of Erhai Lake. However, PLDL involving 100% of paddy lands also increased the sediment export by 17.22%, and eliminated rice production in the region. By comparing the four PLDL scenarios for converting just 50% of paddy lands, the residential participation scenario was identified to be the best choice for PLDL implementation because it achieved the best level of water purification and had the smallest negative effect on other ecosystem services. The optimal scenario for each township showed spatial differentiation, and there were conflicts between the optimal scenarios at basin scale and township scale, suggesting that the object and the spatial-temporal scale should be taken into consideration in land-use decisions using ecosystem services trade-offs.

[1]  Ying Pan,et al.  Land management influences trade-offs and the total supply of ecosystem services in alpine grassland in Tibet, China. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[3]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview , 2006 .

[4]  B. Fu,et al.  Ecosystem services: climate change and policy impacts Editorial overview , 2013 .

[5]  J. Rasinmäki,et al.  Integrating spatial valuation of ecosystem services into regional planning and development , 2017 .

[6]  Jian Peng,et al.  Mapping spatial non-stationarity of human-natural factors associated with agricultural landscape multifunctionality in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, China , 2017 .

[7]  Yang Bai,et al.  Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: a case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[8]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments , 2009 .

[9]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[10]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[12]  Jian Peng,et al.  Identification of Non-economic Influencing Factors Affecting Farmer’s Participation in the Paddy Landto-Dry Land Program in Chicheng County, China , 2017 .

[13]  Jian Peng,et al.  Spatial identification of multifunctional landscapes and associated influencing factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China , 2016 .

[14]  H. Long,et al.  Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services: Implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China , 2014 .

[15]  Shiliang Su,et al.  Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale , 2012 .

[16]  J. Ruhl Adaptive management of ecosystem services across different land use regimes. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  B. Fu,et al.  Ecosystem services modeling in contrasting landscapes , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  G. Ziv,et al.  Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  A. Bronstert,et al.  Assessing the impact of changes in landuse and management practices on the diffuse pollution and retention of nitrate in a riparian floodplain. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[21]  Brian E. Robinson,et al.  Using ecosystem service trade‐offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices , 2016 .

[22]  Z. Shangguan,et al.  China's Grain for Green Program has reduced soil erosion in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and the middle reaches of the Yellow River , 2009 .

[23]  Terry L. Shaffer,et al.  Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA , 2011 .

[24]  S. M. E. Groten,et al.  NDVI—crop monitoring and early yield assessment of Burkina Faso , 1993 .

[25]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World , 2003, Conservation Biology.

[26]  R. Lindborg,et al.  Local conditions in small habitats and surrounding landscape are important for pollination services, biological pest control and seed predation , 2018 .

[27]  A. Church,et al.  Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement , 2016 .

[28]  K. Chan,et al.  Human impacts and ecosystem services: Insufficient research for trade-off evaluation , 2015 .

[29]  M. Dosskey,et al.  Enhancing ecosystem services: Designing for multifunctionality , 2012, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[30]  C. Bao,et al.  The Causal Relationship between Urbanization, Economic Growth and Water Use Change in Provincial China , 2015 .

[31]  T. McPhearson,et al.  Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units , 2015 .

[32]  Li Shi,et al.  The Comparison Study on Forestry Ecological Projects in the World , 2002 .

[33]  Jonathan R. Thompson,et al.  Land‐use impacts on the quantity and configuration of ecosystem service provisioning in Massachusetts, USA , 2015 .

[34]  Chelsea E. Berg,et al.  Building scenarios for ecosystem services tools: Developing a methodology for efficient engagement with expert stakeholders , 2016 .

[35]  G H Huang,et al.  A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: a study for the Lake Erhai Basin. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Shiliang Su,et al.  Economic benefit and ecological cost of enlarging tea cultivation in subtropical China: characterizing the trade-off for policy implications. , 2017 .

[37]  T. Wubet,et al.  Changes in land use alter soil quality and aggregate stability in the highlands of northern Ethiopia , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Jian Peng,et al.  Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in North-western Yunnan, China. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services , 2006 .

[40]  F. W. Larsen,et al.  Global priorities for conservation of threatened species, carbon storage, and freshwater services: scope for synergy? , 2011 .

[41]  Li Zhang,et al.  Characteristics of dissolved organic phosphorus inputs to freshwater lakes: A case study of Lake Erhai, southwest China. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  G. Daily,et al.  Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.