Scale-dependent effects of landscape pattern on plant diversity in Hunshandak Sandland

The influence of landscape pattern on plant diversity has strong scale-dependent effects. However, the relationship is still unclear for sandy land, which covers more than one-third of the world’s land mass. Aiming at exploring such scale-dependent effects in sandy land, we conducted a case study in Hunshandak Sandland, northern China. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was used to disentangle the relations between landscape pattern and alpha and beta plant diversity. Our results show that landscape pattern has an important influence on plant diversity, however, there existed scale effects. Landscape diversity enhanced the alpha diversity, conversely, reduced the beta diversity for all scales. PSSD (Patch Size Standard Deviation) positively related with alpha diversity whilst negatively related with beta diversity on moderate and large spatial scales, same as LPI (Largest Patch Index) on moderate scales. Shape complexity of patches can slightly increase both alpha and beta diversity at large scales. The adjustment of landscape pattern based on different spatial scales can enhance plant diversity. It is useful to improve plant diversity conservation in sandy land.

[1]  J. Baudry,et al.  Is plant temporal beta diversity of field margins related to changes in management practices , 2016 .

[2]  B. Bestelmeyer,et al.  Linking the concept of scale to studies of biological diversity: evolving approaches and tools , 2006 .

[3]  J. Horák,et al.  Biodiversity responses to land use in traditional fruit orchards of a rural agricultural landscape , 2013 .

[4]  O. Wendroth Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. , 2004 .

[5]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Effectiveness of biodiversity indicators varies with extent, grain, and region , 2006 .

[6]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity , 2005 .

[7]  U. Walz Landscape Structure, Landscape Metrics and Biodiversity , 2011 .

[8]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO , 2003 .

[9]  Eddie J. B. van Etten,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using canoco , 2005 .

[10]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Beta diversity at different spatial scales: plant communities in organic and conventional agriculture. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  H. Wehrden,et al.  Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates , 2013 .

[13]  M. L. Cadenasso,et al.  The Ecosystem as a Multidimensional Concept: Meaning, Model, and Metaphor , 2002, Ecosystems.

[14]  D. K. Biswas,et al.  Photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of four plant species with grazing intensities in Hunshandak Sandland, China , 2007 .

[15]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Landscape pattern and transition under natural and anthropogenic disturbance in an arid region of northwestern China , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[16]  S. Wullschleger,et al.  Photosynthesis, transpiration, and water-use efficiency of cotton leaves and fruit , 1991 .

[17]  Landscape context determinants to plant diversity in the permanent meadows of Southern European Alps , 2013, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[18]  Henrik von Wehrden,et al.  Performance of methods to select landscape metrics for modelling species richness , 2015 .

[19]  K. Hall,et al.  Responses of grassland species richness to local and landscape factors depend on spatial scale and habitat specialization , 2012 .

[20]  T. O. Crist,et al.  The alpha–beta–regional relationship: providing new insights into local–regional patterns of species richness and scale dependence of diversity components , 2002 .

[21]  Riccardo Santolini,et al.  Landscape heterogeneity metrics as indicators of bird diversity: Determining the optimal spatial scales in different landscapes , 2013 .

[22]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ON THREE POLLINATOR GUILDS , 2002 .

[23]  D. Rocchini,et al.  Landscape structure effects on forest plant diversity at local scale: Exploring the role of spatial extent , 2015 .

[24]  G. Bacaro,et al.  Landscape effects on diversity of semi-natural grasslands , 2014 .

[25]  S. Saura,et al.  How does forest landscape structure explain tree species richness in a Mediterranean context? , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[26]  U. Walz Indicators to monitor the structural diversity of landscapes , 2015 .

[27]  J. Dengler,et al.  Scale- and taxon-dependent biodiversity patterns of dry grassland vegetation in Transylvania , 2014 .

[28]  K. Anderson,et al.  Measuring biodiversity across spatial scales in a raised bog using a novel paired‐sample diversity index , 2010 .

[29]  Multifaceted Analysis of Patch-Level Plant Diversity in Response to Landscape Spatial Pattern and History on Mediterranean Dunes , 2016, Ecosystems.

[30]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Complex effects of scale on the relationships of landscape pattern versus avian species richness and community structure in a woodland savanna mosaic , 2012 .

[31]  J. Dupuy,et al.  Partitioning the variation of woody plant β-diversity in a landscape of secondary tropical dry forests across spatial scales , 2013 .

[32]  U. Walz,et al.  Linking landscape structure and biodiversity , 2013 .

[33]  Brian L. Markham,et al.  Landsat-8 Sensor Characterization and Calibration , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[34]  P. Smouse,et al.  Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .