Towards an Understanding of Needs, Capabilities and Alignment Mechanisms in Digital Preservation: Results from an Explorative Case Study

Today digital information is conceived as a firm's most important as- set whose availability cannot be taken for granted. As part of an effort to sustain its availability which is threatened by expeditiously changing technologies as- sociated with the risk of obsolete software and hardware, digital preservation (DP) provides effective means. However, to date little is known about DP in the firm. Our study is the first to fill this gap and seeks to provide a deeper under- standing of a firm's DP needs, capabilities and alignment mechanisms. We use a multiple-case design to analyze three firms and adopt the information pro- cessing theory as our theoretical lens. We find lacking decision making proce- dures and organizational responsibilities hampering the alignment between DP needs and capabilities facilitating a culture of information hoarding. Based on the consolidated results we suggest a set of propositions to explain DP needs, capabilities and alignment mechanisms.

[1]  Chao Li,et al.  Design and Implementation of Open Source Based Digital Preservation Experimental Platform (THDP) , 2008, 2008 The 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists.

[2]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Examining the Strategic Alignment and Implementation Success of a KMS: A Subculture-Based Multilevel Analysis , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[5]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[6]  Henry M. Gladney,et al.  Trustworthy 100-year digital objects: Evidence after every witness is dead , 2004, TOIS.

[7]  Dalit Naor,et al.  The need for preservation aware storage: a position paper , 2007, OPSR.

[8]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Enterprise Content Management and Creativity: A Research Framework , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) Summer 10-6-2011 THE DRIVERS BEHIND ENTERPRISE CONTENT MANAGEMENT : A PROCESS-ORIENTED PERSPECTIVE , 2017 .

[10]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  On the Relevance of Enterprise Architecture and IT Governance for Digital Preservation , 2011, EGOV.

[11]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of Information Systems , 1992, MIS Q..

[12]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Reviewing Enterprise Content Management: a functional framework , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  C. Urquhart An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues , 2001 .

[14]  Alla Lake,et al.  Content Server Architecture Pattern for Evolvability and Scalability , 2010, 2010 Fifth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances.

[15]  José Carlos Ramalho,et al.  An intelligent decision support system for digital preservation , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[16]  Giuseppe Labianca,et al.  Information Processing Design Choices, Strategy, and Risk Management Performance , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[18]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Preservation decisions: terms and conditions apply , 2011, JCDL '11.

[19]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[20]  G. Paré Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Study Research , 2004 .

[21]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  Designing Digital Preservation Solutions: A Risk Management-Based Approach , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[22]  Martin Pilgram,et al.  Consultative Committee For Space Data Systems , 2009 .

[23]  Francine Berman,et al.  Got data?: a guide to data preservation in the information age , 2008, CACM.

[24]  Terry Eastwood Appraising digital records for long-term preservation , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[25]  Dirk von Suchodoletz,et al.  Emulation based services in digital preservation , 2010, JCDL '10.

[26]  Raymond A. Lorie,et al.  A methodology and system for preserving digital data , 2002, JCDL '02.

[27]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[28]  B. E. Munkvold,et al.  Contemporary Issues of Enterprise Content Management , 2006 .

[29]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[30]  Paul P. Tallon,et al.  Information life cycle management , 2007, CACM.

[31]  Guy Paré,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[33]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  Electronic Document Management: Challenges and Opportunities for Information Systems Managers , 1995, MIS Q..

[34]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[35]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[36]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  David S. H. Rosenthal Keeping Bits Safe: How Hard Can It Be? , 2010, ACM Queue.

[38]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Impacts of implementing Enterprise Content Management Systems , 2010, ECIS.

[39]  David H. Barlow,et al.  Compulsive Hoarding: Current Research and Theory , 2005 .

[40]  Su-Shing Chen,et al.  The Paradox of Digital Preservation , 2001, Computer.

[41]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[42]  Ramon O'Callaghan,et al.  A Strategy Development Process for Enterprise Content Management , 2005, ECIS.

[43]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  E. Trauth Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends , 2001 .

[45]  Cecilia Rossignoli,et al.  The Shadow of ECM: The Hidden Side of Decision Processes , 2010, DSS.

[46]  Kyong-Ho Lee,et al.  The State of the Art and Practice in Digital Preservation , 2002, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[47]  Va Arlington National Science Board. , 2010 .

[48]  Ethan L. Miller,et al.  Long-term threats to secure archives , 2006, StorageSS '06.

[49]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[50]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[51]  Manfred Thaller,et al.  A generic XML language for characterising objects to support digital preservation , 2008, SAC '08.

[52]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Towards a business process-oriented approach to enterprise content management: the ECM-blueprinting framework , 2011, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[53]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Configurations of inter-organizational relationships : a comparison between US and Japanese automakers , 1995 .

[54]  Rainer Schmidt,et al.  A Service for Data-Intensive Computations on Virtual Clusters , 2009, 2009 First International Conference on Intensive Applications and Services.

[55]  David M. Levy,et al.  Heroic measures: reflections on the possibility and purpose of digital preservation , 1998, DL '98.

[56]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[57]  D. Giaretta,et al.  The Digital Curation Centre: a vision for digital curation , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technology.

[58]  Gail Steketee,et al.  Cognitive and Behavioral Treatment of Compulsive Hoarding , 2003 .

[59]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  Customization of enterprise content management systems: an exploratory case study , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[60]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Designing data governance , 2010, CACM.

[61]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[62]  Samuel A. Fineberg,et al.  Towards SIRF: self-contained information retention format , 2011, SYSTOR '11.

[63]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  Preserving digital data in heterogeneous environments , 2009, JCDL '09.

[64]  Stefan Seidel,et al.  A Study on the Acceptance of ECM Systems , 2011, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[65]  Linda Volonino,et al.  Managing the Lifecycle of Electronically Stored Information , 2007, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[66]  A. Madill,et al.  Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[67]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Plato: a service oriented decision support system for preservation planning , 2008, JCDL '08.

[68]  Paul P. Tallon Understanding the dynamics of information management costs , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[69]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[70]  Ccsds Secretariat,et al.  Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) , 1999 .

[71]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  Modeling Contextual Concerns in Enterprise Architecture , 2011, 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops.

[72]  Adrienne Muir Legal deposit and preservation of digital publications: a review of research and development activity , 2001, J. Documentation.

[73]  Elin Stangeland,et al.  Contemporary issues of enterprise content management: the case of statoil. , 2003 .

[74]  William C. Regli,et al.  A framework for preservable geometry-centric artifacts , 2009, Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling.