EasyPCC: Benchmark Datasets and Tools for High-Throughput Measurement of the Plant Canopy Coverage Ratio under Field Conditions

Understanding interactions of genotype, environment, and management under field conditions is vital for selecting new cultivars and farming systems. Image analysis is considered a robust technique in high-throughput phenotyping with non-destructive sampling. However, analysis of digital field-derived images remains challenging because of the variety of light intensities, growth environments, and developmental stages. The plant canopy coverage (PCC) ratio is an important index of crop growth and development. Here, we present a tool, EasyPCC, for effective and accurate evaluation of the ground coverage ratio from a large number of images under variable field conditions. The core algorithm of EasyPCC is based on a pixel-based segmentation method using a decision-tree-based segmentation model (DTSM). EasyPCC was developed under the MATLAB® and R languages; thus, it could be implemented in high-performance computing to handle large numbers of images following just a single model training process. This study used an experimental set of images from a paddy field to demonstrate EasyPCC, and to show the accuracy improvement possible by adjusting key points (e.g., outlier deletion and model retraining). The accuracy (R2 = 0.99) of the calculated coverage ratio was validated against a corresponding benchmark dataset. The EasyPCC source code is released under GPL license with benchmark datasets of several different crop types for algorithm development and for evaluating ground coverage ratios.

[1]  J. Trygg,et al.  LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters , 2008, BMC Plant Biology.

[2]  Ronen Basri,et al.  Image Segmentation by Probabilistic Bottom-Up Aggregation and Cue Integration , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Masayuki Hirafuji,et al.  Field monitoring support system for the occurrence of Leptocorisa chinensis Dallas (Hemiptera: Alydidae) using synthetic attractants, Field Servers, and image analysis , 2012 .

[4]  Arnold J. Bloom,et al.  Easy Leaf Area: Automated digital image analysis for rapid and accurate measurement of leaf area1 , 2014, Applications in plant sciences.

[5]  Wei Guo,et al.  Illumination invariant segmentation of vegetation for time series wheat images based on decision tree model , 2013 .

[6]  William A Fera The next IT challenge. , 2010, Journal of AHIMA.

[7]  Achim Walter,et al.  The ETH field phenotyping platform FIP: a cable-suspended multi-sensor system. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[8]  Seishi Ninomiya,et al.  On Plant Detection of Intact Tomato Fruits Using Image Analysis and Machine Learning Methods , 2014, Sensors.

[9]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[10]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[11]  K. Chenu,et al.  PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[12]  T. Ochsner,et al.  Canopeo: A Powerful New Tool for Measuring Fractional Green Canopy Cover , 2015, Agronomy Journal.

[13]  M. H. Prieto,et al.  Using Digital Images to Characterize Canopy Coverage and Light Interception in a Processing Tomato Crop , 2008 .

[14]  S. Christensen,et al.  Plant phenomics and the need for physiological phenotyping across scales to narrow the genotype-to-phenotype knowledge gap. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[15]  S. Omholt,et al.  Phenomics: the next challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  J. L. Araus,et al.  Using vegetation indices derived from conventional digital cameras as selection criteria for wheat breeding in water-limited environments , 2007 .

[17]  Falk Schreiber,et al.  HTPheno: An image analysis pipeline for high-throughput plant phenotyping , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  Seishi Ninomiya,et al.  Comparison of ground cover estimates from experiment plots in cotton, sorghum and sugarcane based on images and ortho-mosaics captured by UAV. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[19]  Atsushi Rikimaru,et al.  A Study of the characteristic of the observation angle on the terrestrial image measurement of paddy vegetation cover , 2012 .

[20]  Masami Furuhata,et al.  Relationship of vegetation cover ratio to trowth and yield in wheat , 2003 .

[21]  Jason Smith,et al.  VitiCanopy: A Free Computer App to Estimate Canopy Vigor and Porosity for Grapevine , 2016, Sensors.