Patient-centered activity monitoring in the self-management of chronic health conditions

BackgroundAs activity tracking devices become smaller, cheaper, and more consumer-accessible, they will be used more extensively across a wide variety of contexts. The expansion of activity tracking and personal data collection offers the potential for patient engagement in the management of chronic diseases. Consumer wearable devices for activity tracking have shown promise in post-surgery recovery in cardiac patients, pulmonary rehabilitation, and activity counseling in diabetic patients, among others. Unfortunately, the data generated by wearable devices is seldom integrated into programmatic self-management chronic disease regimens. In addition, there is lack of evidence supporting sustained use or effects on health outcomes, as studies have primarily focused on establishing the feasibility of monitoring activity and the association of measured activity with short-term benefits.DiscussionMonitoring devices can make a direct and real-time impact on self-management, but the validity and reliability of measurements need to be established. In order for patients to become engaged in wearable data gathering, key patient-centered issues relating to usefulness in care, motivation, the safety and privacy of information, and clinical integration need to be addressed. Because the successful usage of wearables requires an ability to comprehend and utilize personal health data, the user experience should account for individual differences in numeracy skills and apply evidence-based behavioral science principles to promote continued engagement.SummaryActivity monitoring has the potential to engage patients as advocates in their personalized care, as well as offer health care providers real world assessments of their patients’ daily activity patterns. This potential will be realized as the voice of the chronic disease patients is accounted for in the design of devices, measurements are validated against existing clinical assessments, devices become part of the treatment ‘prescription’, behavior change programs are used to engage patients in self-management, and best practices for clinical integration are defined.

[1]  S. Hayes,et al.  Theoretical Explanations for Reactivity in Self-Monitoring , 1981 .

[2]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[3]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Motivating, influencing, and persuading users , 2002 .

[4]  Richard C. Atkinson California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology , 2002 .

[5]  Victor M Montori,et al.  Perspective: The Role of Numeracy in Health Care , 2008, Journal of health communication.

[6]  R. Benzo Activity Monitoring in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease , 2009, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[7]  M. Swan Emerging Patient-Driven Health Care Models: An Examination of Health Social Networks, Consumer Personalized Medicine and Quantified Self-Tracking , 2009, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  Lara Allet,et al.  Wearable Systems for Monitoring Mobility-Related Activities in Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review , 2010, Sensors.

[9]  Stephen S. Intille,et al.  Using wearable activity type detection to improve physical activity energy expenditure estimation , 2010, UbiComp.

[10]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions , 2010, BMC health services research.

[11]  Helen Walls,et al.  Participant characteristics associated with greater reductions in waist circumference during a four-month, pedometer-based, workplace health program , 2011 .

[12]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  F. Barwais,et al.  Physical activity, sedentary behavior and total wellness changes among sedentary adults: a 4-week randomized controlled trial , 2013, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[14]  J. Dearani,et al.  Functional recovery in the elderly after major surgery: assessment of mobility recovery using wireless technology. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  E. Wouters,et al.  Effect of ‘activity monitor-based’ counseling on physical activity and health-related outcomes in patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Annals of medicine.

[16]  Adolfo Muñoz,et al.  The Usefulness of Activity Trackers in Elderly with Reduced Mobility: A Case Study , 2013, MedInfo.

[17]  Shaw Bronner,et al.  Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry , 2013, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[18]  Zelma H. T. Kiss,et al.  Smart watch accelerometry for analysis and diagnosis of tremor , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Sally Okun,et al.  Social Networking Sites and the Continuously Learning Health System: A Survey , 2014 .

[21]  Elizabeth J Lyons,et al.  Behavior Change Techniques Implemented in Electronic Lifestyle Activity Monitors: A Systematic Content Analysis , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  L. Shammas,et al.  Home-based system for physical activity monitoring in patients with multiple sclerosis (Pilot study) , 2014, Biomedical engineering online.

[23]  P. Siemonsma,et al.  Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease , 2014, Interactive journal of medical research.

[24]  J. Takács,et al.  Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. , 2014, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[25]  Paul Wicks,et al.  Subjects no more: what happens when trial participants realize they hold the power? , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  D. Asch,et al.  Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. , 2015, JAMA.

[27]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Is physical behavior affected in fatigued persons with multiple sclerosis? , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Laju Sobotie,et al.  A Wearable Future , 2015 .