Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status.

BACKGROUND Cigarette smoking is associated with adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory illness, heart disease and stroke. National data on smoking prevalence often rely on self-reports. This study assesses the validity of self-reported cigarette smoking status among Canadians. DATA AND METHODS Data are from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 4,530 Canadians aged 12 to 79. The survey included self-reported smoking status and a measure of urinary cotinine, a biomarker of exposure to tobacco smoke. The prevalence of cigarette smoking was calculated based on self-reports and also on urinary cotinine concentrations. RESULTS Compared with estimates based on urinary cotinine concentration, smoking prevalence based on self-report was 0.3 percentage points lower. Sensitivity estimates (the percentage of respondents who reported being smokers among those classified as smokers based on cotinine concentrations) were similar for males and females (more than 90%). Although sensitivity tended to be lower for respondents aged 12 to 19 than for those aged 20 to 79, the difference did not attain statistical significance. INTERPRETATION Accurate estimates of the prevalence of cigarette smoking among Canadians can be derived from self-reported smoking status data.

[1]  Branalyn K. Williams.  National Center For Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion regions , 2013 .

[2]  Office on Smoking.  How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General , 2010 .

[3]  M. Tremblay,et al.  The accuracy of self-reported smoking: a systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status. , 2009, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[4]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Canadian Health Measures Survey , 2007 .

[5]  Robert West,et al.  Can We Trust National Smoking Prevalence Figures? Discrepancies Between Biochemically Assessed and Self-Reported Smoking Rates in Three Countries , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[6]  Y. Béland,et al.  Mode Effects in the Canadian Community Health Survey: A Comparison of CATI and CAPI , 2007 .

[7]  Suzelle Giroux.  Canadian Health Measures Survey: sampling strategy overview. , 2007, Health reports.

[8]  S. Bryan,et al.  Canadian Health Measures Survey: clinic operations and logistics. , 2007, Health reports.

[9]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Canadian Health Measures Survey: ethical, legal and social issues. , 2007, Health reports.

[10]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Canadian Health Measures Survey pre-test: design, methods, results. , 2007, Health reports.

[11]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Canadian Health Measures Survey: rationale, background and overview. , 2007, Health reports.

[12]  S. Popova,et al.  The Costs of Substance Abuse in Canada 2002 , 2006 .

[13]  M. Mahoney,et al.  Sensitive and rapid method for the determination of urinary cotinine in non-smokers: an application for studies assessing exposures to second hand smoke (SHS) , 2005 .

[14]  M. Shields.  The journey to quitting smoking. , 2005, Health reports.

[15]  T. Johnson,et al.  Tobacco-reporting validity in an epidemiological drug-use survey. , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[16]  David S Alberts,et al.  Accuracy of self-reported smoking status among participants in a chemoprevention trial. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[17]  Office on Smoking.  The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General , 2004 .

[18]  M. Thun,et al.  Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. , 2004, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[19]  R. Windsor,et al.  The discrepancy between self-reported smoking status and urine continine levels among women enrolled in prenatal care at four publicly funded clinical sites. , 2003, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[20]  S. Lewis,et al.  Cotinine levels and self-reported smoking status in patients attending a bronchoscopy clinic , 2003, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[21]  W. Velicer,et al.  Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. , 2002, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[22]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Biomarkers of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  T. Rosenbaum.  Second Hand Smoke , 1999 .

[24]  K F Rust,et al.  Variance estimation for complex surveys using replication techniques , 1996, Statistical methods in medical research.

[25]  G. Burke,et al.  Misclassification of smoking status in the CARDIA study: a comparison of self-report with serum cotinine levels. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[26]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Elimination of cotinine from body fluids: implications for noninvasive measurement of tobacco smoke exposure. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[27]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[28]  C. Perry,et al.  The measurement of substance use among adolescents: when is the 'bogus pipeline' method needed? , 1987, Addictive behaviors.

[29]  R. L. Carter,et al.  IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans , 1980, IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans.