Pronouns Without Explicit Antecedents: How do We Know When a Pronoun is Referential?

Pronouns without explicit noun phrase antecedents pose a problem for any theory of reference resolution. We report here on an empirical study of such pronouns in the Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, a corpus of spontaneous, casual conversation. Analysis of 2,046 third person personal pronouns in fourteen transcripts indicates that 330 (or 16.1%) lack NP antecedents. These pronouns fall into a variety of subtypes. 88 refer to entities that are inferable from an activated frame or script, or are otherwise easily accommodated. In 110 cases, it could refer to a fact, proposition event, activity, situation, or reason which has been evoked by a previous non-NP. 92 cases of it were classified as pleonastic. In this paper we focus on some problematic subclasses of pronouns which could be analyzed as either referring to entities of various degrees of abstractness that were introduced by or implied in previous discourse, or as non-referential, including pleonastic. Such cases include possible truncated cleft pronouns, possible truncated extraposition pronouns, and certain non-specific uses of they.

[1]  Francis Cornish,et al.  Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding: Evidence from English and French , 1999 .

[2]  Gerald P. Delahunty.  Discourse functions of inferential sentences , 2001 .

[3]  Nancy Hedberg,et al.  Discourse pragmatics and cleft sentences in English , 1990 .

[4]  J. Verschueren,et al.  The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference , 1987 .

[5]  Gerald P. Delahunty,et al.  On the Spanish inferential construction ser que , 2000 .

[6]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .

[7]  Michael Strube,et al.  Dialogue Acts, Synchronizing Units, and Anaphora Resolution , 2000, J. Semant..

[8]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Reference to abstract objects in discourse , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[9]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  INFORMATION STRUCTURE AND THE ACCESSIBILITY OF CLAUSALLY INTRODUCED REFERENTS , 2001 .

[10]  Donna K. Byron,et al.  Semantically Enhanced Pronouns , 2000 .

[11]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of given-new information , 1981 .

[12]  Donna K. Byron,et al.  Resolving Pronominal Reference to Abstract Entities , 2002, ACL.

[13]  Bonnie L. Webber,et al.  Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis , 1991, ArXiv.

[14]  Nancy Hedberg,et al.  The Referential Status of Clefts. , 2000 .

[15]  J. Hawkins.  Definiteness and indefiniteness: a study in reference and grammaticality prediction , 1978 .

[16]  N. Cocchiarella,et al.  Situations and Attitudes. , 1986 .

[17]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Statut cognitif et forme des anaphoriques indirects , 2000 .