Third Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.

OBJECTIVES To collect recent data on the susceptibility of anaerobes and to compare them with results from previous studies. METHODS Four hundred and forty-three anaerobic clinical isolates from various body sites were prospectively collected from October 2003 to February 2005 in nine Belgian hospitals. MICs were determined for nine anti-anaerobic and three recently developed antibiotics. RESULTS Most gram-negative bacilli except Fusobacterium spp. were resistant to penicillin. Piperacillin/tazobactam, metronidazole, chloramphenicol, meropenem and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were very active against all groups, but only 86% of Bacteroides fragilis group strains were susceptible to the latter. Cefoxitin, cefotetan and clindamycin were less active. In particular, only 62%, 52% and 48% of B. fragilis group strains were susceptible, respectively. Clindamycin shows a continuing decrease in activity, as 83% were still susceptible in 1987 and 66% in 1993-94. Anti-anaerobic activity of the new antibiotics is interesting, with MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 and >32 mg/L for moxifloxacin, 2 and 4 mg/L for linezolid and 0.5 and 8 mg/L for tigecycline. CONCLUSIONS The susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria remains stable in Belgium, except for clindamycin, which shows a continuous decrease in activity. However, for each of the tested antibiotics, at least a few resistant organisms were detected. Consequently, for severe infections involving anaerobic bacteria, it could be advisable to perform microbiological testing instead of relying on known susceptibility profiles. Periodically monitoring background susceptibility remains necessary to guide empirical therapy.

[1]  H. Goossens,et al.  Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study , 2005, The Lancet.

[2]  C E Nord,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates in Europe. , 2003, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[3]  D. Snydman,et al.  Antimicrobial resistance and clinical outcome of Bacteroides bacteremia: findings of a multicenter prospective observational trial. , 2000, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  E. Eerola,et al.  Clinical significance and outcome of anaerobic bacteremia. , 1998, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  S. Lauwers,et al.  Use of the E-test for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria. , 1996, Pathologie-biologie.

[6]  M. Delmée,et al.  In vitro activity of amoxycillin/clavulanate and ticarcillin/clavulanate compared with that of other antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria: comparison with the results of the 1987 survey. , 1996, Acta clinica Belgica.

[7]  M. Delmée,et al.  In vitro activity of amoxycillin plus clavulanic acid and ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid compared with that of other antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria. , 1989, Acta clinica Belgica.

[8]  D. Stevens,et al.  Comparison of single and combination antimicrobial agents for prevention of experimental gas gangrene caused by Clostridium perfringens , 1987, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  A. Willis Anaerobic Bacteriology Manual , 1981 .