Control of enzyme reactions by a reconfigurable DNA nanovault

Biological systems use compartmentalisation as a general strategy to control enzymatic reactions by precisely regulating enzyme–substrate interactions. With the advent of DNA nanotechnology, it has become possible to rationally design DNA-based nano-containers with programmable structural and dynamic properties. These DNA nanostructures have been used to cage enzymes, but control over enzyme–substrate interactions using a dynamic DNA nanostructure has not been achieved yet. Here we introduce a DNA origami device that functions as a nanoscale vault: an enzyme is loaded in an isolated cavity and the access to free substrate molecules is controlled by a multi-lock mechanism. The DNA vault is characterised for features such as reversible opening/closing, cargo loading and wall porosity, and is shown to control the enzymatic reaction catalysed by an encapsulated protease. The DNA vault represents a general concept to control enzyme–substrate interactions by inducing conformational changes in a rationally designed DNA nanodevice.DNA nanostructures can cage enzymes but currently fall short of controlling their reactions with substrates. Here, the authors enclose an enzyme inside a dynamic DNA vault, which regulates its access to substrate molecules—and thus its enzymatic activity—through a multi-lock mechanism.

[1]  Pamela A Silver,et al.  Designing biological compartmentalization. , 2012, Trends in cell biology.

[2]  G. Borchard,et al.  Encapsulation of enzymes in Layer-by-Layer (LbL) structures: latest advances and applications. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[3]  Nadrian C Seeman,et al.  RNA used to control a DNA rotary nanomachine. , 2006, Nano letters.

[4]  Veikko Linko,et al.  A modular DNA origami-based enzyme cascade nanoreactor. , 2015, Chemical communications.

[5]  Andrew J Turberfield,et al.  Single-molecule protein encapsulation in a rigid DNA cage. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[6]  Joseph M. Schaeffer,et al.  On the biophysics and kinetics of toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  G. Roelfes,et al.  Control over Enzymatic Activity by DNA‐Directed Split Enzyme Reassembly , 2010, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[8]  Stephan Barcikowski,et al.  Tailored protein encapsulation into a DNA host using geometrically organized supramolecular interactions , 2017, Nature Communications.

[9]  Itamar Willner,et al.  Supramolecular cocaine-aptamer complexes activate biocatalytic cascades. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  A Logic-Gated Nanorobot for Targeted Transport of Molecular Payloads , 2012, Science.

[11]  Hao Yan,et al.  Multi-enzyme complexes on DNA scaffolds capable of substrate channelling with an artificial swinging arm. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[12]  Hai-Jun Su,et al.  Programmable motion of DNA origami mechanisms , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  A. Turberfield,et al.  Guiding the folding pathway of DNA origami , 2015, Nature.

[14]  H. Dietz,et al.  71 Dynamic DNA devices and assemblies formed by shape-complementary, non-basepairing 3D components† , 2015, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[15]  G. Seelig,et al.  Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[16]  H. Dietz,et al.  Dynamic DNA devices and assemblies formed by shape-complementary, non–base pairing 3D components , 2015, Science.

[17]  C R Cantor,et al.  Oligonucleotide-directed self-assembly of proteins: semisynthetic DNA--streptavidin hybrid molecules as connectors for the generation of macroscopic arrays and the construction of supramolecular bioconjugates. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Hao Yan,et al.  Structural DNA Nanotechnology: State of the Art and Future Perspective , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  Hao Yan,et al.  A DNA tweezer-actuated enzyme nanoreactor , 2013, Nature Communications.

[20]  Michael Erkelenz,et al.  DNA-mediated assembly of cytochrome P450 BM3 subdomains. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  Jie Chao,et al.  Single-step rapid assembly of DNA origami nanostructures for addressable nanoscale bioreactors. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  T. G. Martin,et al.  Facile and Scalable Preparation of Pure and Dense DNA Origami Solutions , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  W. Martin,et al.  Evolutionary origins of metabolic compartmentalization in eukaryotes , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  T. Yeates,et al.  Selective molecular transport through the protein shell of a bacterial microcompartment organelle , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  S. Ichikawa,et al.  Enzymes inside lipid vesicles: preparation, reactivity and applications. , 2001, Biomolecular engineering.

[26]  Fabio Mavelli,et al.  Enzymatic reactions in confined environments. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[27]  Kersten S. Rabe,et al.  Orthogonal protein decoration of DNA origami. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[28]  Marco Lazzarino,et al.  A DNA origami nanorobot controlled by nucleic acid hybridization. , 2014, Small.

[29]  Mathias Winterhalter,et al.  Amphiphilic block copolymer nanocontainers as bioreactors , 2001 .

[30]  W. Berger,et al.  Vaults and the major vault protein: Novel roles in signal pathway regulation and immunity , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[31]  Itamar Willner,et al.  Enzyme cascades activated on topologically programmed DNA scaffolds. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[32]  H. Hess,et al.  Proximity does not contribute to activity enhancement in the glucose oxidase–horseradish peroxidase cascade , 2016, Nature Communications.

[33]  P. Rothemund Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.

[34]  V. Birkedal,et al.  Temperature-controlled encapsulation and release of an active enzyme in the cavity of a self-assembled DNA nanocage. , 2013, ACS nano.

[35]  J. Kjems,et al.  Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid , 2009, Nature.

[36]  Christopher M. Jakobson,et al.  Influence of Electrostatics on Small Molecule Flux through a Protein Nanoreactor. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[37]  Ø. Hammer,et al.  PAST: PALEONTOLOGICAL STATISTICAL SOFTWARE PACKAGE FOR EDUCATION AND DATA ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[38]  H. Erickson Size and Shape of Protein Molecules at the Nanometer Level Determined by Sedimentation, Gel Filtration, and Electron Microscopy , 2009, Biological Procedures Online.

[39]  S. Twining Fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled casein assay for proteolytic enzymes. , 1984, Analytical biochemistry.

[40]  Mette D. E. Jepsen,et al.  Construction of a fuzzy and Boolean logic gates based on DNA. , 2015, Small.

[41]  Nico A J M Sommerdijk,et al.  A virus-based single-enzyme nanoreactor. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[42]  Alan Saghatelian,et al.  DNA detection and signal amplification via an engineered allosteric enzyme. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[43]  Hao Yan,et al.  Nanocaged enzymes with enhanced catalytic activity and increased stability against protease digestion , 2016, Nature Communications.

[44]  M. Komiyama,et al.  Nanomechanical DNA origami 'single-molecule beacons' directly imaged by atomic force microscopy , 2011, Nature communications.

[45]  N. Seeman Nanomaterials based on DNA. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[46]  Christof M. Niemeyer,et al.  Functionalization of DNA Nanostructures with Proteins , 2012 .

[47]  A. Turberfield,et al.  A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA , 2022 .

[48]  C. Mao,et al.  A smart DNA tetrahedron that isothermally assembles or dissociates in response to the solution pH value changes. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[49]  Hao Yan,et al.  Scaffolded DNA origami of a DNA tetrahedron molecular container. , 2009, Nano letters.

[50]  M. Ghadiri,et al.  Design of molecular logic devices based on a programmable DNA-regulated semisynthetic enzyme. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[51]  T. Yeates,et al.  Protein-based organelles in bacteria: carboxysomes and related microcompartments , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[52]  Mette D. E. Jepsen,et al.  Construction of a 4 zeptoliters switchable 3D DNA box origami. , 2012, ACS nano.

[53]  Ethan A Merritt,et al.  Cooperative hydrogen bond interactions in the streptavidin–biotin system , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[54]  James A Van Deventer,et al.  Residue-specific incorporation of non-canonical amino acids into proteins: recent developments and applications. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[55]  A. Wahlefeld,et al.  New photometric assay for chymotrypsin in stool. , 1984, Clinical chemistry.

[56]  Thomas Tørring,et al.  Template-directed covalent conjugation of DNA to native antibodies, transferrin and other metal-binding proteins. , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[57]  K. Gothelf,et al.  Multilayer DNA origami packed on hexagonal and hybrid lattices. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[58]  Dennis C Winkler,et al.  A virus capsid‐like nanocompartment that stores iron and protects bacteria from oxidative stress , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[59]  Akinori Kuzuya,et al.  Design and construction of a box-shaped 3D-DNA origami. , 2009, Chemical communications.

[60]  Adam H. Marblestone,et al.  Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[61]  Paul W. K. Rothemund,et al.  Rothemund, P.W.K.: Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297-302 , 2006 .

[62]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes , 2009, Nature.

[63]  Conrad Steenberg,et al.  NUPACK: Analysis and design of nucleic acid systems , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[64]  Greg J. Towers,et al.  HIV-1 uses dynamic capsid pores to import nucleotides and fuel encapsidated DNA synthesis , 2016, Nature.

[65]  F. Kremer,et al.  Polyelectrolyte-compression forces between spherical DNA brushes. , 2007, Physical review letters.