Life cycle assessment of wood-based boards produced in Japan and impact of formaldehyde emissions during the use stage

PurposeThis study aims to conduct a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of wood-based boards to support environmentally conscious design. The goal is achieved by the following objectives: to produce generic LCA data for production of wood-based boards (cradle-to-gate) and to evaluate the human health impacts through life cycle including the use stage (cradle-to-grave), based on the latest regulations for formaldehyde emissions in Japan.MethodsProduction data of particleboard (PB), hard fiberboard (HB), medium-density fiberboard (MDF), and insulation fiberboard (IB) were obtained from major manufacturers of wood-based boards in Japan. We evaluated the impact categories of climate change, abiotic resource depletion, human toxicity (cancer and non-cancer effects), and ecotoxicity (cradle-to-grate assessment). For the human health impacts by formaldehyde emissions from PB and MDF in the use stage (40 years), we calculated the impacts through the life cycle (cradle-to-grave assessment), at all grades of formaldehyde emission rates set by the formaldehyde regulation.Results and discussionCradle-to-gate assessment indicated that adhesives constituted 28–55% of the impacts in all categories for PB and MDF, whereas 74–98% of the impacts resulted from utilities supply for HB and IB. In particular, heat supply from wood boilers accounted for more than 92% of human health (non-cancer) and 71% of ecotoxicity impacts in HB. Cradle-to-grave assessment of PB and MDF, which satisfy strict regulations on formaldehyde emissions (<0.005 mg/m2/h), demonstrated that impacts on human health (total of cancer and non-cancer effects) were decreased by more than 90% compared with a conventional product (0.15 mg/m2/h). The production stage impacts of the products meeting the string regulations were more than half of the total owing to the lower formaldehyde emissions in the use stage.ConclusionsGeneric LCA data for wood-based board production (cradle-to-gate) in Japan are calculated. Significant impacts are adhesives for PB and MDF and utility supply for HB and IB. The cradle-to-grave assessment of PB and MDF revealed that shifting to low-formaldehyde emission products has markedly reduced impacts on human health. We recommend preferentially improving the environmental performance of the production process of wood-based boards in countries with strict regulations on formaldehyde emissions.

[1]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part II): analyzing LCA results and comparison to version 2 , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[2]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Human-Toxicological Effect and Damage Factors of Carcinogenic and Noncarcinogenic Chemicals for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[3]  S. K. Brown Chamber assessment of formaldehyde and VOC emissions from wood-based panels. , 1999, Indoor air.

[4]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory of Particleboard: A Case Study in the Wood Sector (8 pp) , 2006 .

[5]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Indoor Air Pollutant Exposure for Life Cycle Assessment: Regional Health Impact Factors for Households. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Sustainable strategies analysis through Life Cycle Assessment: a case study in a furniture industry. , 2015 .

[7]  Weihui Liang,et al.  Long-Term Formaldehyde Emissions from Medium-Density Fiberboard in a Full-Scale Experimental Room: Emission Characteristics and the Effects of Temperature and Humidity. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  André Luis Christoforo,et al.  Environmental performance assessment of the melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) resin manufacture: a case study in Brazil , 2015 .

[9]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Including indoor offgassed emissions in the life cycle inventories of wood products. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Christofer Skaar,et al.  Integrating human health impact from indoor emissions into an LCA: a case study evaluating the significance of the use stage , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  De Oliveira Gama Caldas Miguel Nuno,et al.  Revision of the EU Green Public Procurement (GPP) criteria for Furniture. Technical Report: Final version. , 2017 .

[13]  Marta Herva,et al.  Assessing environmental sustainability of particleboard production process by ecological footprint , 2013 .

[14]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Comparative study of the life cycle assessment of particleboards made of residues from sugarcane bagasse (Saccharum spp.) and pine wood shavings (Pinus elliottii) , 2014 .

[15]  James B. Wilson Feasibility of using mountain pine beetle-attacked wood to produce wood-plastic composites: preliminary work. , 2010 .

[16]  Keisuke Ando,et al.  Inventory Analysis of Adhesives Used for Wood Based Materials , 2006 .

[17]  Sara González-García,et al.  Environmental performance assessment of hardboard manufacture , 2009 .

[18]  Francisco Antonio Rocco Lahr,et al.  Life cycle assessment of medium density particleboard (MDP) produced in Brazil , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[20]  M. Salem,et al.  Understanding of Formaldehyde Emissions from Solid Wood: An Overview , 2013 .

[21]  W. F. Lehmann,et al.  Long-term study of formaldehyde emission decay from particleboard. , 1990 .

[22]  Anna Lewandowska,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy generation in Poland , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  James E. McDevitt,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Bio- and Petro-Chemical Adhesives Used in Fiberboard Production , 2014, Journal of Polymers and the Environment.

[24]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Integrating Human Indoor Air Pollutant Exposure within Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  James B. Wilson LIFE-CYCLE INVENTORY OF MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD IN TERMS OF RESOURCES, EMISSIONS, ENERGY AND CARBON , 2009 .

[26]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[27]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[28]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[29]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Open-loop recycling: Criteria for allocation procedures , 1997 .

[30]  Paul M. Smith,et al.  REVIEW OF UNITED STATES AND INTERNATIONAL FORMALDEHYDE EMISSION REGULATIONS FOR INTERIOR WOOD COMPOSITE PANELS , 2011 .

[31]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Life cycle inventory of medium density fibreboard , 2006 .

[32]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[33]  Francisco Antonio Rocco Lahr,et al.  Do wood-based panels made with agro-industrial residues provide environmentally benign alternatives? An LCA case study of sugarcane bagasse addition to particle board manufacturing , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei,et al.  Gate to gate life cycle assessment of flat pressed particleboard production in Islamic Republic of Iran , 2016 .

[35]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[36]  Hossein Mousazadeh,et al.  Life cycle assessment of medium-density fiberboard manufacturing process in Islamic Republic of Iran , 2016 .