Morphology in conceptual building design

As the effects of damage to our environment become all the more clear, there is an ongoing social transformation towards sustainability which will affect technology development and make forecasting more difficult. This calls for a holistic integrated design approach which, already at the initial conceptual design phase, requires the involvement of various design experts from different domains to form multidisciplinary design teams. In order to support these teams, a design method based on the use of morphological charts and a morphological overview was developed in cooperation with the Dutch professional organizations of architects and consulting engineers. This tool aids architects and engineers with their new role in the conceptual design phase, as it enables effective exchange of each discipline's perspective on the design task as well as structuring available domain knowledge. The method has been applied in the Master Program project “Integral Design”, at the Faculty of the Built Environment of the Technical University Eindhoven. The design support tool is part of a multidisciplinary program in which students work together with experienced professionals. The outcome shows that the design support tool facilitates a significant increase in the number of possible solutions generated by design teams, and it demonstrates that the morphological charts and morphological overview can be used as an analysis tool for evaluating the impact of different interventions during the conceptual phase of the building design process. This paper provides both a detailed discussion of the design support tool itself, and how the tool was utilized to determine the effectiveness of individual designers. The impact of various interventions is investigated, such as that of adding an experienced professional to a student's design team and the use of C-constructs based on the Concept-Knowledge theory of Hatchel and Weil, in order to further stimulate the generation of sub-solutions.

[1]  Offer Shai,et al.  Creativity Theories and Scientific Discovery: A Study of C-K Theory and Infused Design , 2009 .

[2]  W. Zeiler.  Morphological analysis of C-Kâs C-constructs on design group creativity , 2013 .

[3]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Validation of design methods: lessons from medicine , 2006 .

[4]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Forty years of design research , 2007 .

[5]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Alternating individual and group idea generation: Finding the elusive synergy , 2017 .

[6]  John Riker Haymaker,et al.  Evaluating and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of design process communication , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[7]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[8]  H. H. van den Kroonenberg,et al.  Stimulating Creativity and Innovations by Methodical Design , 1988 .

[9]  Blanche Segrestin,et al.  Sustainable development through innovative design: lessons from the KCP method experimented with an automotive firm , 2009 .

[10]  Tom Ritchey.  Strategic Decision Support using Computerised Morphological Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Kah-Hin Chai,et al.  Understanding design research: A bibliometric analysis of Design Studies (1996–2010) , 2012 .

[12]  Lars Almefelt.  Requirements-Driven Product Innovation - Methods and Tools Reflecting Industrial Needs , 2005 .

[13]  W Wim Zeiler.  Design handbook: A methodical framework , 2017 .

[14]  Harriet Atkinson,et al.  Design Research – History, theory, practice: histories for future-focused thinking , 2016 .

[15]  S. McComb.  Mental Model Convergence: The Shift from being an Individual to being a Team Member , 2007 .

[16]  Sara A. McComb,et al.  Merging internal and external processes: examining the mental model convergence process through team communication , 2010 .

[17]  Imre Horváth,et al.  A treatise on order in engineering design research , 2004 .

[18]  Michael Filzmoser,et al.  DESIGNING AND EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY BIM USE - AN EXPLORATIVE STUDY , 2014 .

[19]  Louis H. Sullivan,et al.  The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered , 2012 .

[20]  John Haymaker,et al.  Relationships Between Project Complexity and Communication , 2011 .

[21]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Capturing architects’ designerly ways of knowing about users: Exploring an ethnographic research approach , 2016 .

[22]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Generations of knowledge management in the architecture, engineering and construction industry: An evolutionary perspective , 2010, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[23]  P Perica Savanovic,et al.  Integral design method in the context of sustainable building design : closing the gap between design theory and practice , 2009 .

[24]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  General Systems Theory Based Integral Design Method , 2009 .

[25]  Ch Dorst,et al.  Design practice and design research: finally together? , 2016 .

[26]  W Wim Zeiler.  Integral design to improve communication and sub-solution generation in building design collaboration , 2016 .

[27]  John Clarkson,et al.  Models of designing , 2005 .

[28]  Fixation effect in creative ideas generation: Opposite impacts of example in children and adults , 2016 .

[29]  A. Hatchuel,et al.  HOW DESIGN THEORIES SUPPORT CREATIVITY - AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2012 .

[30]  Judith Hills,et al.  The semantic turn: A new foundation for design , 2008 .

[31]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  Designer behaviour and activity: an industrial observation method , 2011 .

[32]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[33]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  A comparison of the behaviour of student engineers and professional engineers when designing , 2012 .

[34]  W Wim Zeiler.  The difference in communication between architects and engineers and the effectiveness within integral design , 2014 .

[35]  A. Hatchuel,et al.  The Interplay between Creativity Issues and Design Theories: A New Perspective for Design Management Studies? , 2011 .

[36]  Herbert Birkhofer,et al.  An Extensive and Detailed View of the Application of Design Methods and Methodology in Industry , 2005 .

[37]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  Stimulating Creativity in Building Design Education: Introducing Experts and C-K‘s C-Projectors , 2012 .

[38]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The creative cognition approach. , 1995 .

[39]  Marine Agogué,et al.  The impact of age and training on creativity: A design-theory approach to study fixation effects , 2014 .

[40]  HU Min-zhong,et al.  On Creative Cognition , 2005 .

[41]  Johan Ölvander,et al.  A computerized optimization framework for the morphological matrix applied to aircraft conceptual design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[42]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[43]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF DESIGN PROCESS MODELS ACROSS DISCIPLINES , 2012 .

[44]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research , 2008 .

[45]  K. Krippendorff.  The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation For Design , 2005 .

[46]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  A Step Beyond to Overcome Design Fixation: A Design-by-Analogy Approach , 2015 .

[47]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? , 2007 .

[48]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Design as Forcing: Deepening the Foundations of C-K Theory , 2007 .

[49]  Lars Almefelt,et al.  Balancing Properties While Synthesising a Product Concept - a Method Highlighting Synergies , 2005 .

[50]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[51]  Le Masson Pascal,et al.  Creativity and Design Reasoning: How C-K Theory Can Enhance Creative Design , 2007 .

[52]  Tony Flowerdew,et al.  New Methods of Thought and Procedure , 1968 .

[53]  Jaewook Lee,et al.  User-centric knowledge representations based on ontology for AEC design collaboration , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[54]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Design in Mind , 2009, Design Issues.

[55]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[56]  Nigan Bayazit,et al.  Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research , 2004, Design Issues.

[57]  Tarja Häkkinen,et al.  Reducing embodied carbon during the design process of buildings , 2015 .

[58]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  Integral design method to support nZEB design : an real project experiment , 2016 .

[59]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K theory : Notions and applications of a unified design theory , 2002 .

[60]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas , 2007 .

[61]  Janet McDonnell.  Gifts to the Future: Design Reasoning, Design Research, and Critical Design Practitioners , 2016 .

[62]  Fumihiko Kimura,et al.  Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications , 2009 .

[63]  Philip Cash,et al.  Investigating design: A comparison of manifest and latent approaches , 2014 .