The Relationship Between the Need for Closure and Support for Military Action Against Iraq: Moderating Effects of National Attachment

A variety of studies suggest that a high need for closure—that is, a desire for knowledge that is clear, stable, and unambiguous as opposed to confusing or uncertain—may be associated with greater hostility toward relevant outgroups. Using international attitudes as the context, the authors examine the hypothesis that the relationship between the need for closure and support for military action against Iraq may be moderated by identification with the national ingroup. Specifically, it is expected that this relationship will be moderated by nationalism (i.e., an aggressive form of identification based on a desire for national dominance) but not patriotism (i.e., a more neutral love of one’s country). The data provided a clear pattern of support for this hypothesis and additional analyses indicated that a high need for closure reduced variability about the use of force among the highly nationalistic but not the highly patriotic.

[1]  Christopher M. Federico Ideology and the Affective Structure of Whites’ Racial Perceptions , 2006 .

[2]  J. S. Long,et al.  Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model , 2000 .

[3]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  National Identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or Patriotism? An Empirical Test With Representative Data , 2003 .

[5]  A. Harvey Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity , 1976 .

[6]  A. Anastasi Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: need for closure effects on in-group bias. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  H. Dekker,et al.  Nationalism and its explanations , 2003 .

[9]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Conflict termination: an epistemological analysis of international cases , 1989 .

[10]  M. Sherif Superordinate Goals in the Reduction of Intergroup Conflict , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  John M. Brehm,et al.  Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies , 1997 .

[12]  Maurizio Viroli For Love of Country: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism , 1995 .

[13]  R. Kosterman,et al.  Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. , 1989 .

[14]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information, and American Public Opinion , 2002 .

[15]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[16]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[17]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  When similarity breeds content: need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Meredith O'Brien,et al.  The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. , 1995 .

[19]  J. Jost,et al.  Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance, and other system justifying attitudes , 1999 .

[20]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[21]  D. Rucinski The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[22]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[23]  S. Feshbach Nationalism, Patriotism, and Aggression , 1994 .

[24]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Symbolic politics: A socio-psychological theory. , 1993 .

[25]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Intergroup aggression: its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Peter Suedfeld,et al.  Integrative Complexity of Communications in International Crises , 1977 .

[27]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  A. Golec Cognitive Skills as Predictor of Attitudes Toward Political Conflict: A Study of Polish Politicians , 2002 .

[29]  Sander L. Koole,et al.  On the Seizing and Freezing of Negotiator Inferences: Need for Cognitive Closure Moderates the Use of Heuristics in Negotiation , 1999 .

[30]  F. Pratto,et al.  The Interface Between Ethnic and National Attachment: Ethnic Pluralism or Ethnic Dominance? , 1997 .

[31]  Zachary Elkins,et al.  Are Patriots Bigots? An Inquiry into the Vices of In-Group Pride , 2003 .

[32]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Christopher M. Federico,et al.  Understanding responses to political conflict: interactive effects of the need for closure and salient conflict schemas. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  M. Deutsch The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[35]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[36]  S. Fiske Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. , 1998 .

[37]  D. Bar-Tal The Rocky Road Toward Peace: Beliefs on Conflict in Israeli Textbooks , 1998 .

[38]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .