Augmenting sensorimotor control using “goal-aware” vibrotactile stimulation during reaching and manipulation behaviors

We describe two sets of experiments that examine the ability of vibrotactile encoding of simple position error and combined object states (calculated from an optimal controller) to enhance performance of reaching and manipulation tasks in healthy human adults. The goal of the first experiment (tracking) was to follow a moving target with a cursor on a computer screen. Visual and/or vibrotactile cues were provided in this experiment, and vibrotactile feedback was redundant with visual feedback in that it did not encode any information above and beyond what was already available via vision. After only 10 minutes of practice using vibrotactile feedback to guide performance, subjects tracked the moving target with response latency and movement accuracy values approaching those observed under visually guided reaching. Unlike previous reports on multisensory enhancement, combining vibrotactile and visual feedback of performance errors conferred neither positive nor negative effects on task performance. In the second experiment (balancing), vibrotactile feedback encoded a corrective motor command as a linear combination of object states (derived from a linear-quadratic regulator implementing a trade-off between kinematic and energetic performance) to teach subjects how to balance a simulated inverted pendulum. Here, the tactile feedback signal differed from visual feedback in that it provided information that was not readily available from visual feedback alone. Immediately after applying this novel “goal-aware” vibrotactile feedback, time to failure was improved by a factor of three. Additionally, the effect of vibrotactile training persisted after the feedback was removed. These results suggest that vibrotactile encoding of appropriate combinations of state information may be an effective form of augmented sensory feedback that can be applied, among other purposes, to compensate for lost or compromised proprioception as commonly observed, for example, in stroke survivors.

[1]  Christopher J Hasson,et al.  Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement? , 1973, Psychological review.

[3]  A. Welford Choice reaction time: Basic concepts , 1980 .

[4]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  TIKL: Development of a Wearable Vibrotactile Feedback Suit for Improved Human Motor Learning , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  R. Riener,et al.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[6]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  Tactile motion instructions for physical activities , 2009, CHI.

[7]  D. Raab DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .

[8]  R. Miall,et al.  The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Rauschecker Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  David M. Eagleman,et al.  Using space and time to encode vibrotactile information: toward an estimate of the skin’s achievable throughput , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Good Vibrations: Tactile Feedback in Support of Attention Allocation and Human-Automation Coordination in Event-Driven Domains , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[14]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  K H Sienko,et al.  Effects of multi-directional vibrotactile feedback on vestibular-deficient postural performance during continuous multi-directional support surface perturbations. , 2009, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[16]  Daniel W. Repperger,et al.  A study on spatially induced "virtual force" with an information theoretic investigation of human performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  P. D. Neilson,et al.  Stochastic prediction in pursuit tracking: An experimental test of adaptive model theory , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  G. M. Gauthier,et al.  Oculo-manual tracking of visual targets: control learning, coordination control and coordination model , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  D. Raab Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. , 1962, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems , 1995 .

[22]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[23]  Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi,et al.  Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Franco Lepore,et al.  Multisensory gain within and across hemispaces in simple and choice reaction time paradigms , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  Allison M Okamura,et al.  Haptic feedback enhances rhythmic motor control by reducing variability, not improving convergence rate. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  MinghuiSun,et al.  Effects of Multimodal Error Feedback on Human Performance in Steering Tasks , 2010 .

[28]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Effects of Vibrotactile Feedback on Human Learning of Arm Motions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Tactile proprioceptive input in robotic rehabilitation after stroke , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[31]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Multisensory enhancement: gains in choice and in simple response times , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  F. Colavita Human sensory dominance , 1974 .

[34]  Erwin Schoonderwaldt,et al.  MusicJacket—Combining Motion Capture and Vibrotactile Feedback to Teach Violin Bowing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[35]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Neurophysiological Basis of a Tactile Vision-Substitution System , 1970 .

[36]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Activation of the cerebellum in co-ordinated eye and hand tracking movements: an fMRI study , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  J. Vercher,et al.  Cerebellar involvement in the coordination control of the oculo-manual tracking system: effects of cerebellar dentate nucleus lesion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  K. H. Sienkoa Effects of multi-directional vibrotactile feedback on vestibular-deficient postural performance during continuous multi-directional support surface perturbations , 2015 .

[39]  Kenneth J. Kokjer,et al.  The Information Capacity of the Human Fingertip , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[40]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Effects of optimal tactile feedback in balancing tasks: A pilot study , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[41]  Mark Woodward,et al.  Effects of the Endpoint Adjudication Process on the Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial: The ADVANCE Trial , 2013, PloS one.

[42]  Xiang Cao,et al.  Effects of Multimodal Error Feedback on Human Performance in Steering Tasks , 2010, J. Inf. Process..

[43]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Comparison of Skin Stretch and Vibrotactile Stimulation for Feedback of Proprioceptive Information , 2008, 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[44]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives , 2000, Nature.

[45]  M. Tyler,et al.  Brainport: an alternative input to the brain. , 2005, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[46]  Knut Drewing,et al.  Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  M HERSHENSON,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  A novel motor function training assisted system for upper limbs rehabilitation , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[49]  P. D. Neilson,et al.  Internal models and intermittency: A theoretical account of human tracking behavior , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[50]  M. Reiner,et al.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Influences of hand movements on eye movements in tracking tasks in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  R. Miall,et al.  The Cerebellum and the Timing of Coordinated Eye and Hand Tracking , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[53]  Robert A. Scheidt,et al.  Visuomotor Learning Enhanced by Augmenting Instantaneous Trajectory Error Feedback during Reaching , 2013, PloS one.