Coalition, Cryptography, and Stability: Mechanisms for Coalition Formation in Task Oriented Domains

Negotiation among multiple agents remains an important topic of research in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI). Most previous work on this subject, however, has focused on bilateral negotiation, deals that are reached between two agents. There has also been research on n-agent agreement which has considered "consensus mechanisms" (such as voting), that allow the full group to coordinate itself. These group decision-making techniques, however, assume that the entire group will (or has to) coordinate its actions. Sub-groups cannot make sub-agreements that exclude other members of the group. In some domains, however, it may be possible for beneficial agreements to be reached among sub-groups of agents, who might be individually motivated to work together to the exclusion of others outside the group. This paper considers this more general case of n-agent coalition formation. We present a simple coalition formation mechanism that uses cryptographic techniques for subadditive Task Oriented Domains. The mechanism is efficient, symmetric, and individual rational. When the domain is also concave, the mechanism also satisfies coalition rationality.

[1]  Eithan Ephrati,et al.  The Clarke Tax as a Consensus Mechanism Among Automated Agents , 1991, AAAI.

[2]  G. Zlotkin,et al.  Cooperation and conflict resolution via negotiation among autonomous agents in noncooperative domains , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  L. Shapley Cores of convex games , 1971 .

[4]  Reid G. Smith,et al.  A framework for problem solving in a distributed processing environment , 1978 .

[5]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Rules of Encounter - Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers , 1994 .

[6]  Eithan Ephrati,et al.  Distributed consensus mechanisms for self-interested heterogeneous agents , 1993, [1993] Proceedings International Conference on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems.

[7]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Negotiation and Task Sharing Among Autonomous Agents in Cooperative Domains , 1989, IJCAI.

[8]  H. P. Young,et al.  The Shapley value: Individual contribution and just compensation , 1988 .

[9]  John Towne Danson,et al.  About "Lloyd's" , 1872 .

[10]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  Introducing the Tileworld: Experimentally Evaluating Agent Architectures , 1990, AAAI.

[11]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  Theories of Coalition Formation , 1998 .

[12]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  A Domain Theory for Task Oriented Negotiation , 1993, IJCAI.

[13]  Eithan Ephrati,et al.  Reaching Agreement through Partial Revelation of Preferences , 1992, ECAI.

[14]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Resolving Goal Conflicts via Negotiation , 1988, AAAI.

[15]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Multiagent Negotiation under Time Constraints , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Negotiations Over Time in a Multi-Agent Environment: Preliminary Report , 1991, IJCAI.

[17]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Coalition Formation Among Autonomous Agents: Strategies and Complexity , 1993, MAAMAW.

[18]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[19]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Negotiation with Incomplete Information About Worth: Strict Versus Tolerant Mechanisms , 1992, MAAMAW.

[20]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Consenting Agents: Negotiation Mechanisms for Multi-Agent Systems , 1993, IJCAI.

[21]  Victor Lesser,et al.  Multistage negotiation in distributed planning , 1988 .

[22]  Steven P. Ketchpel Coalition Formation Among Autonomous Agents , 1993, MAAMAW.