Do ants need to be old and experienced to teach?

SUMMARY Learning is widespread in invertebrates. However, whether social insects improve their recruitment skills with experience is only beginning to be investigated. Tandem running is a one-to-one form of recruitment used by certain species of ant. It is a remarkable communication system that meets widely accepted criteria for teaching in non-human animals. Here, we determined experimentally to what extent participation in, and efficient execution of, tandem running depends on either the age or the experience of worker ants. To investigate these issues, we constructed colonies of the ant Temnothorax albipennis with different compositions of inexperienced and experienced workers from different age cohorts and then examined which ants participated in tandem runs when they emigrated. Our results show that the ability to participate actively in recruitment by tandem running is present in all worker age groups but the propensity to participate varies with experience rather than age per se. Experienced individuals were more likely to engage in tandem runs, either as leaders or as followers, than young inexperienced individuals, and older experienced ants were more likely to lead tandems than older inexperienced ants. Young inexperienced ants led faster, more rapidly dispersing and less accurately orientated tandem runs than the older experienced ants. Our study suggests that experience (rather than age per se) coupled to stimulus threshold responses might interact to promote a division of labour so that a suitable number of workers actively participate in tandem runs.

[1]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Communication by Tandem Running in the Ant Genus Cardiocondyla , 1959 .

[2]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  A. J. Riveros,et al.  Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Larger colonies do not have more specialized workers in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2009 .

[5]  Chris Tofts,et al.  Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Paul Graham,et al.  Route learning by insects , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  A. Dornhaus Specialization Does Not Predict Individual Efficiency in an Ant , 2008, PLoS biology.

[8]  Hölldobler,et al.  Age-dependent and task-related morphological changes in the brain and the mushroom bodies of the ant Camponotus floridanus , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  L. Keller Social evolution in ants , 1996 .

[10]  James F. A. Traniello,et al.  Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Teaching in tandem-running ants , 2006, Nature.

[12]  Chris Tofts,et al.  Doing the right thing: Ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Teaching with Evaluation in Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[14]  S. Pratt Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[15]  Ana B Sendova-Franks,et al.  Ant search strategies after interrupted tandem runs , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  M. M�glich,et al.  Tandem Calling: A New Kind of Signal in Ant Communication , 1974, Science.

[17]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[18]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Blinkered teaching: tandem running by visually impaired ants , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  K. Harris,et al.  Age‐related changes in the number and structure of synapses in the lip region of the mushroom bodies in the ant Pheidole dentata , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  P. Nouvellet,et al.  Fundamental Insights into the Random Movement of Animals from a Single Distance‐Related Statistic , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[21]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[22]  S. Porter,et al.  Foragers of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei: a disposable caste? , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[24]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Division of labour and seasonality in the ant Leptothorax albipennis: worker corpulence and its influence on behaviour , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Between-caste aversion as a basis for division of labor in the ant Pheidole pubiventris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  Gwenaël Kaminski,et al.  Individual Experience Alone Can Generate Lasting Division of Labor in Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[28]  A. Tofilski,et al.  Shorter-lived workers start foraging earlier , 2009, Insectes Sociaux.

[29]  T. O. Richardson,et al.  Radio tagging reveals the roles of corpulence, experience and social information in ant decision making , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  M. Witek,et al.  Division of labour among workers with different life expectancy in the ant Myrmica scabrinodis , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Not everything that counts can be counted: ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  R. Dukas Evolutionary biology of insect learning. , 2008, Annual review of entomology.

[33]  N. Franks,et al.  Improvement in collective performance with experience in ants , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  Nigel R Franks,et al.  Flexible task allocation and the organization of work in ants , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Mario L. Muscedere,et al.  Age and task efficiency in the ant Pheidole dentata: young minor workers are not specialist nurses , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  R. Wehner,et al.  Navigation in wood ants Formica japonica: context dependent use of landmarks , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[38]  E. Robinson,et al.  Physiology as a caste-defining feature , 2009, Insectes Sociaux.

[39]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  G. Robinson Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[41]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Worker nutrition and division of labour in honeybees , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Colony size affects collective decision-making in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.