Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterizing lymph nodes with focal cortical thickening in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to ascertain the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing the significance of focal cortical thickening in the lymph nodes of patients followed up after surgery for cutaneous melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ultrasound was used to examine 460 consecutive patients to identify nodes with focal hypoechoic cortical thickening. Patients whose nodes revealed these features underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) focusing on the area of cortical thickening. Enhancement in the arterial and parenchymal phases was evaluated: A generalized homogeneous or intense enhancement was considered benign and the presence of a perfusion defect was considered metastatic. RESULTS After exclusion of 24 patients with frank signs of malignancy at gray-scale ultrasound, the study included 436 patients. Focal hypoechoic cortical thickening was seen in 44 of 436 nodes in as many patients. In 29 nodes, the area of focal thickening showed contrast enhancement similar to that of the remaining cortex on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. In 15 nodes, the area of cortical thickening was less well vascularized than the adjacent parenchyma in the arterial phase and there were areas with perfusion defects that were more evident in the parenchymal phase. FNAC focusing on the areas of focal cortical thickening identified 13 metastatic nodes and 31 nodes with benign features. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with FNAC correctly classified 42 of 44 nodes, showing a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.5%. CONCLUSION Although our findings need to be confirmed in larger series, they indicate that contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be useful in clinical practice for characterizing focal cortical thickening in lymph nodes. The exclusion or identification of regional lymph node metastases is of fundamental importance in oncologic staging because this issue directly influences both the prognosis and the choice of therapeutic strategy.

[1]  B. Fornage,et al.  Cortical morphologic features of axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of metastasis in breast cancer: in vitro sonographic study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  M. Schmid-Wendtner,et al.  The Use of High‐Resolution Ultrasonography for Preoperative Detection of Metastases in Sentinel Lymph Nodes of Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[3]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part I: normal lymph nodes. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[4]  Josep Malvehy,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[5]  A. Eggermont,et al.  Rotterdam Criteria for sentinel node (SN) tumor burden and the accuracy of ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): can US-guided FNAC replace SN staging in patients with melanoma? , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  F. Ferro,et al.  Evaluation of Lymph Node Perfusion Using Continuous Mode Harmonic Ultrasonography With a Second‐Generation Contrast Agent , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy--clinical experience in 100 patients. , 2009, Radiology.

[8]  G. Ott,et al.  Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture. , 1998, Radiology.

[9]  Michael Ying,et al.  An Overview of Neck Node Sonography , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[10]  R. Stramare,et al.  High‐sensitivity power Doppler imaging of normal superficial lymph nodes , 2004, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[11]  Judy C. Boughey,et al.  Preoperative Sonographic Classification of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer: Node-to-Node Correlation With Surgical Histology and Sentinel Node Biopsy Results , 2010 .

[12]  R. Felix,et al.  Differential diagnosis of lymph node lesions: a semiquantitative approach with colour Doppler ultrasound. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  R. Stramare,et al.  Automated quantitative evaluation of lymph node perfusion on contrast-enhanced sonography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  K. Shannon,et al.  False-negative sentinel node biopsy because of obstruction of lymphatics by metastatic melanoma: the value of ultrasound in conjunction with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy , 2009, Melanoma research.

[15]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[16]  M. Choi,et al.  Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  R. Caiazzo,et al.  Evaluation of vascular patterns of cervical lymph nodes with power Doppler sonography , 1997, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[18]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[19]  F. Giovagnorio,et al.  Color Doppler Sonography in the Evaluation of Superficial Lymphomatous Lymph Nodes , 2002, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[20]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Sonographic appearances of cervical lymph nodes: Variations by age and sex , 2002, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.