Pathways to Politics for Women Parliamentarians in Myanmar

The number of women parliamentarians in Myanmar increased during the last decade of democratization before the February 2021 coup d’état yet remained extremely low at about 15% of parliament in the 2020 election. This paper uses the concept of political pathway to explore barriers and opportunities that women parliamentarians experienced along their life course. It does so through in-depth interviews conducted in early 2020 with 20 women and 10 men parliamentarians elected in the 2015 general election. Results suggest that women tend to take distinct pathways from men and face specific opportunities and barriers through supply-driven factors such as parental socialization, experience of national crises, available peer networks, acquired professional experiences, and available family support, and through a main demand-driven factor in party recruitment and politics. This informs recommendations in the conclusion in terms of increasing resources and support available to women and addressing discrimination by political parties.

[1]  Ye Phone Kyaw.  The Development of National Ideology in Myanmar: Political Socialization and the Role of the Tatmadaw since the Second World War , 2021 .

[2]  Shanjiu Liu.  Gender gaps in political participation in Asia , 2020, International Political Science Review.

[3]  E. Bjarnegård.  Introduction: Development Challenges in Myanmar: Political Development and Politics of Development Intertwined , 2020, The European Journal of Development Research.

[4]  V. Braun,et al.  Thematic analysis , 2017 .

[5]  Nankyung Choi.  Women’s political pathways in Southeast Asia , 2018, International Feminist Journal of Politics.

[6]  John Gastil,et al.  Pathways of Immigrant Political Socialization: Examining the Role of News Media, Social Connections, and Community Interaction , 2014 .

[7]  C. Muller,et al.  The Political Socialization of Adolescent Children of Immigrants. , 2013, Social science quarterly.

[8]  Betsy Sinclair,et al.  The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior , 2012 .

[9]  Gail Mcelroy,et al.  Candidate Gender and Voter Choice: Analysis from a Multimember Preferential Voting System , 2010 .

[10]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  Politics and the Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Preferentially Selected to Contest Hard-to-Win Seats , 2010 .

[11]  M. L. Krook.  Why Are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection , 2009 .

[12]  M. Tremblay.  Democracy, Representation, and Women: A Comparative Analysis , 2007 .

[13]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[14]  Pamela Paxton,et al.  Pathways to Power: The Role of Political Parties in Women’s National Political Representation1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  J. Mayer,et al.  Gendered political socialization in four contexts: political interest and values among junior high school students in China, Japan, Mexico, and the United States , 2004 .

[16]  R. Dalton.  THE PATHWAYS OF PARENTAL SOCIALIZATION , 1982 .