CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective

While the concepts and principles associated with learner autonomy underpin a broad range of CALL applications and research projects, current debates and research paradigms in CALL do not provide adequate tools and models to investigate in depth the relationship between CALL and the development of learner autonomy. This paper explores the potential of cultural-historical activity theory to study this relationship. Starting from the complex and multidimensional nature of learner autonomy, it highlights some of the weaknesses in the CALL literature addressing some aspects of this relationship. Following a presentation of the main tenets of cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT), including the notion of contradiction which is at the core of CHAT, it then seeks to demonstrate how activity theory can assist us in rethinking our understanding of learner autonomy in the context of technology-rich language learning environments and in formulating suitable criteria and questions, which can guide judgemental and empirical analyses. The paper concludes by illustrating some of the principles explored through examples drawn from an activity-theoretical judgemental analysis of a French module delivered to first year students in Dublin City University.

[1]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[2]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[3]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[4]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[5]  Leni Dam,et al.  Self-instruction in language learning , 1989 .

[6]  D. Laplane Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[7]  M. Cole A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .

[8]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[9]  P. Benson,et al.  Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning , 1996 .

[10]  Brent G. Wilson,et al.  Affordances and Constraints of the Internet for Learning and Instruction. , 1996 .

[11]  David Little,et al.  A Guide to Language Learning in Tandem via the Internet. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 46. , 1996 .

[12]  Mike Levy,et al.  Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization , 1997 .

[13]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[14]  P. Benson,et al.  The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy , 1997 .

[15]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Computers and language learning: an overview , 1998, Language Teaching.

[16]  Elspeth Broady,et al.  Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching , 1998 .

[17]  Klaus Schwienhorst The ‘third place’ – virtual reality applications for second language learning , 1998 .

[18]  Garold L. Murray,et al.  Autonomy and Language Learning in a Simulated Environment. , 1999 .

[19]  Robin Goodfellow,et al.  "Reflective Conversation" in the Virtual Classroom , 1999 .

[20]  Seth Chaiklin,et al.  Activity Theory and Social Practice , 1999 .

[21]  Janet Atlan L'utilisation des stratégies d'apprentissage d'une langue dans un environnement des TICE , 2000 .

[22]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Measurement in action: an activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Gunther Kaltenböck Learner autonomy: a guiding principle in designing a CD-ROM for intonation practice , 2001 .

[24]  Steven G. McCafferty,et al.  Activity Theory and the Incidental Learning of Second-language Vocabulary , 2001 .

[25]  Phil Benson,et al.  Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning , 2001 .

[26]  J. Lemke The Long and the Short of It: Comments on Multiple Timescale Studies of Human Activity , 2001 .

[27]  Dieter Wolff,et al.  A Multimedia Tool to Develop Learner Autonomy , 2001 .

[28]  Beyond Language Teaching Towards Language Advising , 2001 .

[29]  Manuel Jiménez Raya,et al.  Autonomy in foreign language learning , 2004 .