A mathematical model to develop a Scheffler-type solar concentrator coupled with a Stirling engine

This study develops and applies a new mathematical model for estimating the intercept factor of a Scheffler-type solar concentrator (STSC) based on the geometric and optical behaviour of the concentrator in Cartesian coordinates, and the incorporation of a thermal model of the receptor is performed using numerical examinations to determine the technical feasibility of attaching the STSC to a 3kWe Stirling engine. A numerical validation of the mathematical model is determined based on the experimental results reported for the WGA500 concentrator and the CNRS-PROMES system receiver. The numerical results allow for the design of the STSC and a comparison with a parabolic dish that provides the same thermal demand. Our findings show that the highest concentration was obtained with an edge angle of 45°, which was observed in the parabolic dish as well, but the STSC receiver shows a 7% increase in the thermal efficiency compared with the efficiency of the parabolic dish receiver. Finally, the STSC is appropriate for regions where the solar height allows for a reduction of convective thermal loss.

[1]  H. Tan,et al.  Radiation performance of dish solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems , 2008 .

[2]  Sendhil Kumar Natarajan,et al.  Numerical investigation of natural convection heat loss in modified cavity receiver for fuzzy focal solar dish concentrator , 2007 .

[3]  Chin-Hsiang Cheng,et al.  Optimization of geometrical parameters for Stirling engines based on theoretical analysis , 2012 .

[4]  Leonardo Tognotti,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of a micro-CHP flameless unit , 2012 .

[5]  Alain Ferriere,et al.  Thermal model of a dish/Stirling systems , 2009 .

[6]  O. Hensel,et al.  Design principle and calculations of a Scheffler fixed focus concentrator for medium temperature applications , 2010 .

[7]  R. Y. Ma Wind effects on convective heat loss from a cavity receiver for a parabolic concentrating solar collector , 1993 .

[8]  Leonard D. Jaffe Optimization of Dish Solar Collectors , 1983 .

[9]  V. Bǎdescu Optimum operation of a solar converter in combination with a Stirling or Ericsson heat engine , 1992 .

[10]  Chin-Hsiang Cheng,et al.  Dynamic simulation of thermal-lag Stirling engines , 2013 .

[11]  Gajanan K. Awari,et al.  Experimental analysis of Scheffler reflector water heater , 2011 .

[12]  V. Badescu Optimizing of Stirling and Ericsson cycles using solar radiation , 1992 .

[13]  G. C. Bakos,et al.  Conversion of thermal energy into electricity via a water pump operating in Stirling engine cycle , 2009 .

[14]  V. Badescu Different tracking error distributions and their effects on the long-term performances of parabolic dish solar power systems , 1994 .

[15]  Shireesh B. Kedare,et al.  Determination of stagnation and convective zones in a solar cavity receiver , 2010 .

[16]  Fatih Aksoy,et al.  An experimental study on the development of a β-type Stirling engine for low and moderate temperature heat sources , 2009 .

[17]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[18]  Terry G. Lenz,et al.  Thermal performance of solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems , 1985 .

[19]  Sendhil Kumar Natarajan,et al.  Comparison of receivers for solar dish collector system , 2008 .

[20]  Raymond W. Harrigan,et al.  Solar energy fundamentals and design : with computer applications , 1985 .

[21]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[22]  R. Courant Differential and Integral Calculus , 1935 .

[23]  A. Chandak,et al.  The use of solar energy for powering a portable autoclave. , 2012, The Journal of hospital infection.

[24]  Richard B. Diver,et al.  The Advanced Dish Development System Project , 2001 .