The utility of six over-the-counter (home) pregnancy tests

Abstract Background: The home pregnancy market is rapidly evolving. It has moved from detection of pregnancy on the day of missed menstrual bleeding, to detection claims 4 days prior. It is moving from all manual tests to digital tests, with a monitor reading the bands and informing women they are pregnant. A thorough study is needed to investigate the validity of claims and evolving usefulness of devices. Methods: Studies were proposed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of home tests and their abilities to detect pregnancy. Methods examined the abilities of tests to detect human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), hyperglycosylated hCG, free β-subunit, a mixture of these antigens in 40 individual early pregnancy urines. Results: Using a mixture of hCG, hyperglycosylated hCG and free β-subunit typical for early pregnancy, the sensitivity of the First Response manual and digital tests was 5.5 mIU/mL, while the sensitivities of the EPT and ClearBlue brand manual and digital tests was 22 mIU/mL. On further evaluation, the First Response manual and digital tests both detected 97% of 120 pregnancies on the day of missed menstrual bleeding. The EPT manual and digital devices detected 54% and 67% of pregnancies, respectively, and the ClearBlue manual and digital devices detected 64% and 54% of pregnancies, respectively. Conclusions: First Response manual and digital claim >99% detection on the day of missed menses. The results here suggest similar sensitivity for these two tests. The EPT and ClearBlue manual and digital test make similar >99% claims, the data presented here disputes their elevated claim.

[1]  Home pregnancy test simple to use, reasonably accurate, especially if result is positive. , 1979, Family planning perspectives.

[2]  Lambert Hh.  Correction on home pregnancy testing. , 1989 .

[3]  Arnaud Jaccard,et al.  Reliability of home pregnancy-test kits in the hands of laypersons. , 1989 .

[4]  D. Dunson,et al.  Natural limits of pregnancy testing in relation to the expected menstrual period. , 2001, JAMA.

[5]  L. Cole,et al.  Accuracy of home pregnancy tests at the time of missed menses. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  L. Cole,et al.  Sensitivity of over-the-counter pregnancy tests: comparison of utility and marketing messages. , 2005, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA.

[7]  L. Cole,et al.  Gestational trophoblastic diseases: 2. Hyperglycosylated hCG as a reliable marker of active neoplasia. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.

[8]  L. Cole,et al.  Carbohydrate and peptide structure of the α- and β-subunits of human chorionic gonadotropin from normal and aberrant pregnancy and choriocarcinoma , 1997, Endocrine.

[9]  Levels of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) following conception and variability of menstrual cycle length in a cohort of women attempting to conceive , 2009 .

[10]  Levels of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) following conception and variability of menstrual cycle length in a cohort of women attempting to conceive. , 2009, Current medical research and opinion.

[11]  Mark A Cervinski,et al.  Qualitative point-of-care and over-the-counter urine hCG devices differentially detect the hCG variants of early pregnancy. , 2009, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[12]  L. Cole,et al.  Background hCG in non-pregnant individuals: need for more sensitive point-of-care and over-the-counter pregnancy tests. , 2009, Clinical biochemistry.

[13]  F. Byrn,et al.  The normal variabilities of the menstrual cycle. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.